
Eric Weinstein
@EricRWeinstein
Followers
1M
Following
37K
Media
2K
Statuses
23K
Interested in prebunked malinformation.
Argleton
Joined April 2009
Hey @grok, my sarcastic physicist colleagues are lecturing me again. Maybe I’m a big dumb-dumb, but I seem to remember something about John Aristotle Phillips’ undergraduate work under Freeman Dyson in 1976 at Princeton. Was physics secrecy really confined to the 1940s & 1950s?
Why would the government possibly classify nuclear physics results in the 1940s and 50s? .It’s a real puzzle. They must’ve been afraid of physics beyond the standard model decades before it was formulated.
225
364
4K
Mostly not. If you know a more informed critic of the academic science community, please let me know his/her name. And even I am here to say that mostly science…even academic science is reliable. A string theorist may well lie to you about string theory. But not basic physics.
@EricRWeinstein probably because the scientific "community" repeatedly betray the public.
100
30
384
@RepLuna if you are serious about what you are saying please contact the scientific community and not just repeat stuff from the IC. I’m happy to make some introductions to relevant people.
66
25
443
Respectfully. Here is what I think is going on. I) Independent breakthrough science is in a long wind down starting with the Mansfield amendment, and is being partially decommissioned. Why? Because it was found to be too powerful and redistributive. II) The National Security.
@EricRWeinstein I’m a big fan of yours. But isn’t it a little much to expect a politician to not speak plainly on a podcast but use “scientifically precise” terms?. Regarding the propaganda element of all this, here’s what I believe. The level of discourse recently about UAP’s and potential.
301
319
2K
No. You are correct. Assume even that beings were using additional hidden dimensions to traverse space and time. You still wouldn’t talk like this. It’s just mental sludge. I can riff a bunch of equally vapid vibe terms: . “Digital Seraphim”.“Energetic Consciousness”.
Am I crazy to assume that this is internally facing propaganda rather than actual interdimensional beings?.
416
149
2K
Dear @RepLuna,. What are you talking about and why are we not consulting our own physics and math people about something that “defies physics”? . It’s like refusing to consult farmers about crops or pilots about aircraft or avoiding native speakers about a text in another tongue.
446
156
3K
Q1: What is an “interdimensional being”??. Assume I know what a dimension is. And what a being is. Q2: Why is there **NEVER** anyone with their expertise in smooth manifolds, bundles, DoF, phase spaces, etc around for these briefings. Why avoid all experts? This is serious BS.
NEW: Rep. Anna Paulina Luna claims she has seen evidence of "interdimensional beings" with credible people reporting "movement outside of time and space." . "They call them interdimensional beings. I think that they can actually operate through the time spaces that we
1K
420
6K
One of my greatest frustrations is the inability for nuance and “not knowing” to survive internet discussion. My assertion that “we may be faking a UFO situation” on Rogan is independent of alien visitation. Yes, it appears that we faked UFOs! I wasn’t wrong. And yes, there.
@EricRWeinstein Only thing i disagree with here is the UFO issue is fake. It’s absolutely not. Look up the Bugo Sphere research ongoing in Mexico if you want to see a real UFO object. Or the UFO footage above the LA fires in Feb.
272
110
1K