Eric Mrozek πΊπΈπ¦
πβοΈπ§¦π½βπ»
@EricMMrozek
Followers
2K
Following
6K
Media
2K
Statuses
51K
#Author, #Editor, #Youtuber, & Founder Of @FreeEagleStu β’ American Liberal β’ Nationalist/Globalist β’ Atheist β’ @SaveThatPlay & @EricMrozekCom
Joined September 2009
Like my tweets? You'll love my stories! Here is a thread for the Book Ones that I have out so far! π
10
8
49
Jeff Bezos got his current wife by stabbing Mackenzie in the back, so his penis just has a thing for botoxed box.
Men think this is an improvement. MacKenzie Scott, Princeton graduate, writing novels at age six, studied under Toni Morrison, founded Amazon, and one of the biggest philanthropists in the history of humanity. Versus.. whatever the fuck this is.
0
0
0
That completely explains why Andy Weir's #StarTrek pitches were shit and got rejected. Political and social commentary is the cornerstone of almost all stories. At the most basic level, you can't put any characterization, intrigue, worldbuilding, or aesops in without that!
0
0
0
Now THAT'S a funny gaffe!
βgive a plug to yourselfπββοΈ!β βitβs a s*x shop-β βohπ―β KAMALA WAS GAGGED LMAOOOπππ
0
0
0
No offense to @ewarren, but all of that money probably has to go toward curbing Trump's catastrophic budget deficits. The good news is that this tax would cut them down by about 33% in one go!
The Ultra-Millionaire Tax Act would generate over $6 trillion over the next decadeβwithout raising taxes on 99.85% of American households. This wealth tax for millionaires and billionaires could pay for universal child care, free community college, Medicare expansion, and more.
0
0
0
That is laughable. Among other things, the country has a pro-choice majority and still supports Israel. If anything, the Democrats should drop the Assault Weapons Ban, focus on violent illegals, and be critical of the Israeli Right.
Run a straight white 55+ man: > Israel critical > lowering costs and housing > make abortion βstates rightsβ > tough border, wider migration > loosely high church Protestant Youβd win literally every demographic after this admin. Easiest layup in history.
0
0
0
Yep. Many episodes are about what was going on "in the now," but the five classic shows still work because the Federation put our political and social ideals directly in front of us. #StarTrek
There are a lot of people saying the only reason people love TOS and TNG Star Trek is because of nostalgia. Maybe some, but we love them because they had truly brilliant writing, and storytelling, and characters we cared about, and great acting, and hope for a better future.
1
0
0
It's rather obvious that some people are objecting to the execution, but others are whining about gay Klingons. The former critique is valid. The latter is not because of what #StarTrek represents.
What's funny is that the idea of Star Trek going back to its roots, still very much laughs in the face of the conservative ideology that has been trying to rule Star Trek for years The only people really complaining about it are older, middle-aged, white people Which is really
0
0
1
Tariffs? Ditto. The President might have a role in combating bad trade practices, but they're a constitutional power that has been explicitly reserved for Congress. Anything beyond combating a practice like the dumping of a good should go through the people!
0
0
0
For war powers, the President should only have a free hand in the event of a sudden attack, the invocation of NATO's Article 5, or time-sensitive intelligence that enables a clean strike on, say, a terrorist. In pretty much every other case, they need to go to Congress.
1
0
0
Far more limited is a tall order, but there have to be strict limits on presidential war powers, the pardoning power, and tariffs. Encouraging your followers to commit crimes just so you can pardon them later is beyond the pale and a grave threat to our democratic republic.
The βNo Kingsβ people support passing legislation to ensure that no current or future president can have so much power, right? To permanently restore the presidency to its far more limited role? Right? Or do they just want a king with a different political ideology?
1
0
0
Yep. @Matt_Dillahunty is good at arguing this point, but I remember when Dennis Prager accidentally gave the game away. He said that the Old Testament would never have been accepted if it was abolitionist in nature. IT'S GOD! ISN'T IT?!
Is slavery immoral? Yes. Is the Bible the word of God? Yes. Is God moral? Yes. Then why did say you can own slaves?? Matt Dillahuntyπ£οΈ If God decides morality then morality becomes arbitraryβ¦β¦ If morality exists independently then God isnβt the source of morality
0
0
0
It's good to see some pushback, but I wonder if things are the way they are right now in part because guys feel like ordinary love doesn't exist.
Men, please donβt let yourself be blackpilled by the most abnormal women alive. You donβt actually want to be the kind of guy who really turns them on.
0
1
0
I thought that this was an open secret that everyone already knew about? Hillary's loss in 2016 might not have been so obvious because of the eight-year itch, but it's blatantly obvious that the country voted for self-immolation over a nice black lady with a weird laugh in 2024.
AXIOS: Some top Democrats are quietly debating a fraught question: whether the party's best bet for winning back the presidency in 2028 is to nominate a man β perhaps a straight, White, Christian man. Former first lady Michelle Obama fueled such talk recently, saying the U.S. is
1
0
0
AI makes that an open question, though. Some tycoons have said that the goal of AI is to eliminate almost all human labor. If that's the case, capitalism's survival depends on policies like a universal access to the means of production, which sort of resembles socialism.
Capitalism rewards the highly competent. The incompetent want to end capitalism.
0
1
2
It depends on when that happens in the span of a civilization. If aliens showed up during our most hyper-religious times, that would backfire spectacularly. If they appeared now and offered to help with a vaccine in exchange for trade, that would be justifiable. #StarTrek
Star Trek: Voyager actor Robert Beltran on how the Prime Directive is ridiculous: "The idea of leaving any species to die in its own filth when you have the ability to help them, just because you wanna let them get through their normal evolutionary processes is bunk -- it's a
0
0
1
Plus, one must consider Generalplan Ost, which would have been the most horrific war crime in human history. Hitler was planning to enslave and exterminate EVERYONE between Poland and the Urals. There's being a Lysenkoist dumbass. And then, there's that!
0
0
0
To put it simply, the commies were stupid evil, and the fascists were EVIL evil. Much of the communist death toll was the result of astonishingly stupid policies. Hitler, Mussolini, and the Japanese fascists were responsible for World War II and war crimes like the Holocaust!
Objectively, more people were killed under the hammer and sickle than the swastika. Yet only one provokes a visceral reaction across Western institutions. Why?
1
0
0
Get rid of Luke and Leia's kiss. Other than that, Empire is a fantastic movie! #StarWars
If you could change one thing about The Empire Strikes Back what would it be?
0
0
0
I agree. There is one example on YouTube that illustrates the point: Stacey Abrams' cameo on Discovery. Politicians have had bit parts in certain franchises before, but putting Stacey up as the President of Earth comes off as an endorsement that snaps the fourth wall! #StarTrek
Shatner is wrong. Star Trek was political, but it wasn't preachy. It made you think instead of telling you how to think. It changed minds organically instead of trying to force an ideology. And most important, it was well-written by actual writers instead of hack activist.
0
0
2
I agree. Andor is the best TV show by lightyears, and it might have even surpassed the movies! #StarWars
Once again casually thinking about how ANDOR really was some of the greatest Star Wars ever.
0
0
4