Responding to my and Inspiring Philosophy’s critique of Davis and Bowen’s attack on the exodus/conquest narratives, Josh Bowen gave a defence of why you should follow the academic consensus using his medical condition (MS) as an example. /1
As I grow older and see the health of my loved ones decline, I recognize how precious time is, our inabilty to spend it the way we would like, the futility of debate, and the value of learning.
@InspiringPhilos
"Google it" = "I don't know and am too lazy to look it up and learn the material myself, so I'm going to shift the cognitive load onto someone or somewhere else."
@InspiringPhilos
WTH!? Since when is an argument from positive evidence an argument from silence? A historical source can be wrong or unfounded, but that's not arguing from silence. Paulogia is creating the quintessential straw man, i.e., "no other evidence is an argument from silence." Silly.
A fascinating new discovery of an early alphabetic inscription written in a Semitic dialect that dates to the Early Bronze Age (ca. 2450-2300 BCE). This is a potential game changer for the history of the alphabet.
It is incumbent upon people who think to examine the data and decide whether a consensus is consistent with the evidence.
So, would you concur with this,
@InspiringPhilos
? /11
If no one ever challenged a consensus, there would be no new consensuses and no progress. Progress only occurs when one sees that the data is not congruent with the consensus and challenges the status quo. /10
Here's the facts when it comes to any academic consensus. Consensuses are not always right and don’t always agree with the data that is accepted even within its own field. Consensuses are sometimes driven by academic traditions or cults of personality. /9
Fundamentalism is a hard brittle eggshell too often conealing untested faith and unrealized discipleship. When broken, the contents pour out and the heat of hardship and trial transform the scramble into atheism. The two are more similar than different.
Humans are omnivores and we have more than one metabolic pathway to derive energy from food. So, I ignored the consensus and put myself on a ketogenic diet. And ever since, my A1Cs have been normal without medication, exercise, or the “healthy” consensus diet. /7
I, however, disagree that one should slavishly follow the consensus and have my own medical counterexample. I am a type-2 diabetic. My mother has been a diabetic since she was 40 and is on insulin. I was diagnosed 10 yrs ago after a string of high blood glucose tests. /2
Bowen is probably correct in following the medical consensus in the treatment of his MS. However, that in no way means that every consensus is correct or should be followed. I defeated my diabetes by defying the consensus treatment that was endorsed by the medical experts. /8
Diabetes occurs when you are resistant to insulin and your body can't remove glucose (mostly from eating carbohydrates) from your blood. The medical consensus is that progress of the disease can’t be reversed once diagnosed and most patients will manage it with medication. /3
The consensus is also that diabetes can only be treated by medication, exercise, and a balanced diet of whole grains and healthy carbohydrates (25%) and fruits and vegetables (50%) with minimal consumption of meats and fat (< 25%). /4
It disturbs me how many OECs/TEs insist upon sound scientific scholarship to support an old earth, then immediately turn around and abandon sound historical scholarship to embrace the likes of David Rohl.
Now, I’m not a subject-matter expert in pathology, diet, or medical science. I have no expertise or training in the field of medicine. But even I could see that the data is not consistent with the medical consensus. /5
How is eating more carbohydrates (even “healthy” carbohydrates) and minimizing meat and fat consumption going to help with a disease that resulted from eating carbohydrates? If eating carbohydrates caused the problem, why isn’t their elimination from my diet a good treatment? /6
I wouldn't share the faith until I understand what they reject. Are they rejecting holiness, a caricature of the Bible, the people who are representing the Bible?
@InspiringPhilos
@AiG
AiG uses the same sort of reasoning when it comes to their attempt to explain how their date for the flood comes after the building of the Giza Pyramids, i.e., attack ANE history with ad hoc reasoning and doubt. It's hard to take what they say seriously.
@InspiringPhilos
What? A modern Gnostic group claiming that an ancient Gnostic group was the source for Christianity? Shocking! Shocking! I'm so shocked!!! Shoooocked, ya hear? 😂
@zoeharcombe
Because lockdowns are about memetic social experimentation and the opportunistic expansion of government. They have nothing to do with science-based public health policy.
Returning tomorrow at 8pm PDT is the debate on the exodus that was so controversial that it was censored.
Watch the debate about the exodus that was CENSORED with commentary via
@YouTube
Just a reminder that our newest popcorn video will be premiering tomorrow (Monday July 25th) at 8PM PDT. I hope to see all our subscribers in the live chat!!!
Popcorn Review July 2022 via
@YouTube
I insisted in a doctoral seminar that a course in logic should be required of all students going through a doctoral program in biblical studies. Check this out!
@MikeWingerii
@lakewoodchurch
@JoelOsteen
Copyright claims to avoid critique is a complete abuse of the legal system. I sympathize with what you're going through having been through it myself.
@InspiringPhilos
Ron Wyatt used dowsing rods, so every modern archaeologist should also use dowsing rods. If they don't, they're proving themselves to be skeptics that belong to secret societies and hate the Bible. 😂
Our next live stream, where we take your questions on ancient Egypt and the Bible, is this Friday at 8PM PDT.
Live Stream
#30
: Full Moon on Saturday. via
@YouTube
@InspiringPhilos
The Thutmosis III scarab is interesting because it was made in a Ramesside style. Essentially, it is a memorial scarab that dates to dynasty 19.
Join us tonight at 8:30pm PST for our weekly live stream where we take your questions on ancient Egypt and the Bible.
Live Stream
#85
: St. Nicholas vs Arius, the Cage Match. This Time It's T... via
@YouTube
Join us tonight at 8PM PDT when we will take your questions on ancient Egypt and the Bible.
Live Stream
#66
: Osiris, Vampires, and Other Undead Playas. via
@YouTube
@womnofvalr
@Pinkheart4you
Strong men in the church are called mean, divisive, and uncharitable, and are driven from leadership then replaced with those who are easily controlled. The problem with strong men is that they do not compromise on principle and cannot be swayed from it even when unpopular.
Tomorrow at 8PM PDT is our live stream where we take your questions on ancient Egypt and the Bible.
Live Stream
#51
: Manna Machines Over Area 51. via
@YouTube
@DRMSHPhD
Who is providing oversight for these tweets now that Dr Heiser had passed away? To have authoritative statements representing Dr Heiser from an anonymized twitter account is concerning. How much are these the sentiment of Heiser vs. the sentiment of his trustees?
@InspiringPhilos
Dr Run has his PhD in Digital Communication and Multimedia. He's not an expert or even a cognate authority on anything Biblical or historical. The dude should be ignored.
Join us this Friday at 8:30pm PDT when we will take your questions on ancient Egypt and the Bible.
Live Stream
#79
: Another Vague Cleopatra Tomb Sighting via
@YouTube
Join us tomorrow at 8pm PST as we take your questions on Ancient Egypt and the Bible.
Live Stream
#89
: Osiris god of the dead. He's dead dead. Dead as a door ... via
@YouTube
Join us tonight at 8pm PST for our weekly live stream where we take your questions on ancient Egypt and the Bible.
Live Stream
#84
: And Now Back To Our Regularly Scheduled Program via
@YouTube
Our next live stream is tomorrow, Friday at 8PM PDT. During these live streams, we take your questions on ancient Egypt and the Bible.
Live Stream
#29
: A Copper Penny For Your Thoughts via
@YouTube
@TansuYegen
This is obviously wrong. The pyramids are made from stone or mudbrick, not concrete. At unfinished pyramids, we find unfinished stone blocks that are not in perfect block shapes. Many stones have chisel, saw, and quarry marks. Plus, we have the remains of the quarries. Debunked.
Join us this Friday Oct 21 at 8pm PDT where we will take you questions on ancient Egypt and the Bible. The live chat is now open for your questions.
Live Stream
#74
: Who Are You? What Do You Want? via
@YouTube