Europe must defend free speech or we don’t defend Europe.

David Sacks calls out the New York Times for fabricating a story about a dinner he never had with Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang @DavidSacks "And how does the New York Times respond? They just delete the dinner, but they don't delete any other part of this. But if your source has

Power your home for less. Generate clean energy from the sun and save every month with Tesla Solar.

David Friedberg explains the “spiral of socialism” government spending demands higher taxes, higher taxes drain economic activity and shrink the tax base, the shrinking tax base deepens deficits, and the cycle quietly pushes society toward socialism before anyone notices.

🚨 Chamath on Why New York Times Runs Hit Jobs on Non-Establishment Figures “The whole point was to get enough chatter … so that people like Sacks, and other people in the future just say, I'm not going to try this … What they want are people they can … ultimately co-opt.”

It is so tedious that NY Times even pretends to be anything other than a mouthpiece for far left propaganda

DAVID SACKS: “People can see the New York Times for what it is, which is basically a bunch of political activists who are pretending to be reporters. And essentially they just launder the point of view of their anonymous sources, who are basically left-wing Democrats.”

BIG EPISODE! 🚨 All four besties are BACK after a week off -- Sam Altman declares "Code Red" at OpenAI -- Sacks vs New York Times: behind the hit piece -- New poverty line? -- America's slow descent into socialism (0:00) Bestie intros (0:12) OpenAI declares "Code Red" as

The European Commission’s $140 million fine isn’t just an attack on @X, it’s an attack on all American tech platforms and the American people by foreign governments. The days of censoring Americans online are over.

First unboxing! cc: @nytimes

This is exactly why people are abandoning mainstream media: cheap insults instead of actual reporting You don’t have to agree with @DavidSacks on everything, but pretending he “sucks” while ignoring his actual track record is unserious. A few reminders: -Co-founded PayPal, one

the sacks story is trash. anyone who reads it can tell that it's trash. reporters are defending it bc they think admitting industry imperfection hurts them all. but obviously admitting what we can all see would BUILD credibility, and denying reality (again) does the opposite.

@mjnblack My counter point is this was the previous ai czar https://t.co/54Y9hiIhru

President Trump deserves all the credit for building an amazing team and prioritizing AI and crypto as cutting-edge technologies where America must lead the world.

Nice debunk. NYT’s dishonesty is so obvious that offended readers are just taking the time to do this on their own.

Congrats, @DavidSacks! The NYT discovered that the AI and crypto czar is... promoting policies that benefit AI and crypto! Groundbreaking stuff... They even uncovered the shocking revelation that... all software companies use AI now! Back up the Pulitzer truck!

There are lies, damned lies, and NYT headlines.

@Hadas_Gold well he asked me and others not to post anything because the NYT doesn’t deserve the airtime. but looks like folks ignored him because they wanted to do the right thing and speak the truth, which is something i don’t see a lot of amongst the journos-with-agendae

This is the new talking point — that the negative reaction to the article must be “coordinated.” If that were true, the messages would have leaked already. I didn’t ask for help, nor did I need to. Readers could see on their own that the body of the article didn’t support its

They’re spiraling.