I'm an independent hobbyist investigator and commentator with an “unlaw” focus. I’m not really interested in law, legal theory, etc. Methodologically, I’m a microbiologist who studies law-related things. I measure court processes and activities, and track pseudolaw phenomena. I

Sovereign Citizen "Judge" Anna Von Reitz's residence sold at public auction by judicial order after Anna doesn't pay her income tax. https://t.co/v6b7eWdGKH Ooppsieee...

Citation volume is a shorthand way to measure what a court does & what’s important at that court. I occasionally check CanLII for Alberta King’s Bench stuff, since I formerly worked there. Today the rankings showed a pattern: Civil sanctions for impaired driving: #1 - Baker v

Been playing with LLMs on their ability to detect and respond to pseudolaw concepts. Gemini pointed to this US government resource for a rebuttal to Strawman Theory secret bank accounts. Nice, concise, accurate. Good stuff. https://t.co/s8EGWa4cG6

Another tasty pseudolaw academic publication from Poland! The previous article ( https://t.co/ocDawY8Cjo) looked at pseudolaw primarily from a threat/security context. This one examines pseudolaw itself. In a way the results are unremarkable. Prof. Pastuszko identifies the usual

The faux Embassy of Te-Moana-Nui-a-Kiwa. Gregory has his house under is a sovereign-pseudolaw embassy that has existed in NZ for years - they are also responsbile for the fraudulent IDs (Seapass, diplomats). The faux Maori Rangers is a subsidary 1/6 https://t.co/zQdXoAYdxj

Probably not news to many of you, but HRM Didulo's https://t.co/UG8QYXt0da website went down in the last month or so. Such is the way of pseudolaw structures. They don't last. That's why recording data is so important. It's now impossible to reconstruct what occurred in these

Working on something. Makes me irritable. I've sworn to myself this is the last time I'll attempt to address this subject. Y'see, when you're retired, you shouldn't have to do things that make you feel dirty in the morning. Oh well. Now I know for the next time. Never again.

Amateur. If Miller knew what he was doing, he'd have demanded to know if the judge was saying her name in all upper case letters or not.

New academic publication on ideology of Australian “Sovereign Citizens”. Labels the phenomenon as (government) Illegitimacy, Individualism, and Immunity. I’m not going to make a detailed analysis. There’s “local experts” who are better positioned on Australia. I stick to Canada

Pseudolaw scholarship is expanding at an amazing pace. Here is an initial review of the first article (that I know of) documenting the Polish variations. Patryk Król uses parallels in language, concepts & objectives to identify Polish pseudolaw groups. That's the Strawman.

Not often that a Canadian judge gets "de-gowned". The Ontario Judicial Counsel has concluded (balance of probabilities) that Ontario Justice Paul Currie committed sexual and physical assault, and inflicted bodily injury. The summary of decision is here:

I have a legitimate basis to cite the Hanna Barbera Scooby Doo cartoon in a legal academic publication. I'm not kidding. At all. This means either my research has careened way off course, or I am following the one true Golden Path. *fiendish giggling*

An unpaywalled version of the Cestnick article is here: https://t.co/D1Tuzz7okO I actually really love the whole postage stamp pseudolaw magic thing. It's hard to express how excited I was when I spotted the court stamp parallel. True cargo cult mimicry!

Was mentioned in @TimCestnick regular Globe and Mail tax advice column as documenting very bad ideas for tax evasion ( https://t.co/BIj9uZnFSI) The article he cited is "Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Arguments ["OPCA"] as Magic and Ceremony", where I conclude you just can't

HRM Didulo appeared in Court on January 14. I’ve been providing ongoing commentary from an (ex)lawyer’s perspective. This time the issue was "disclosure" complaints initiated by HRM. In Canada prosecutors and police have an obligation to provide their case to the accused in

Now, if only someone would write the screenplay and wave it in front of Netflix!

Honestly, I enjoy when judges move into cold clinical rage mode. Judge Stephanie Wanke of the Alberta Court of King's Bench issued a short piece sharply criticizing a failure to follow basic service rules in a foreclosure. I've attached the whole thing. It's worth reading. Not

Hey, is your faith in the ultimate goodness of humanity in need of a kick in the crotch? Check out this lovely decision: https://t.co/Ogd1ZklGz0 In short, parents buy home for son. Son refuses to pay anything and destroys home. Son gets evicted. Son sues for $792,355.11. Nice!