Science editor, Paranormal Daily News, author of Psi Wars: TED, Wikipedia and the Battle for the Internet, member, Frontier Journalists Network
#parapsychology
I'm amazed that people repeat the phrase "Extraordinary Claims Require Extraordinary Evidence" without once thinking about how problematic it is.
"Extraordinary" is an opinion. It's not quantifiable and it can mean what you want it to mean. It's not appropriate for science.
My wife does IT which means that our home has:
-mechanical windows
-No smart locks
-No smart thermostats
-No Alexa
-No smart light bulbs
-No smart Fridge, oven, washer/dryer etc.
-No smart doorbell
-No Internet connected cameras
If you believe in the paranormal you are more likely to experience it. This is because consciousness is fundamental to reality.
Anomalistic psychology often gets this wrong. People aren’t fooling themselves, they’re literally creating their own reality.
It's basically been established that the universe is nonlocal, which means that we are too.
From there, the only logical conclusion you can reach is that connectedness of all living things is real.
Long ago, when I was researching paranormal skepticism, it quickly became obvious that it was deeply tied to atheism. Not all atheists were skeptics, but skeptics were atheists.
Skepticism, it seemed, was just another belief system, even if it was referred to as non belief.
If entanglement is true, then everything is connected, including minds. This is sufficient explanation for why we have a shared experience of physical reality.
The Guerrilla Skeptics on Wikipedia
#wikigate
are funded by the Center for Inquiry, which is a secular humanist non profit with a mission (on tax returns) to evangelize atheism around the world.
The GS are using Wikipedia to evangelize atheist materialism. That's their mission.
The Guerrilla Skeptics of Wikipedia are an anti-intellectual atheist materialist organization dedicated to teaching the world that we have brains, but no minds.
Which would explain a lot.
To reject psi:
1. Reject all psi experience from everyone
2. Reject all historical records of psi
3. Reject all experimental evidence
4. Assign 100% credibility to all skepticism
I've never found this to be a rational method of inquiry.
If consciousness is fundamental then quantum physics probably sits at the intersection of timeless, spacelessness and physical reality.
Entangled photons behave as though they're not separated because they aren't. Distance isn't a fundamental property of the universe.
Disbelief in psychic ability exposes defective rational thinking.
If almost half the planet has a psychic experience, are they all mistaken? Or is it more likely that the disbelief is merely someone's out of control ego, e.g., "I don't experience this, therefore it's not real."
I have trouble with the idea of our reality being a simulation, hologram, etc.
Yes, I think we're experiencing a kind of scaffolding over a deeper reality, but I think it's still reality, just in a form that's easier for us to understand and relate to. i.e. understanding a tree.
@BrandonFugal
@FrancMilburn
@g_knapp
@HISTORY
I'm the author of that article. I'm not a bit surprised that your bio is being treated that way. Those people have the whole process of owning that part of Wikipedia so well orchestrated that no one is getting past them. I've been telling people this for years.
Regarding the UFO hearings:
The day we accept telepathy as real, will also be the day we learn how to make contact with extra terrestrial people,
They're literally waiting for us to get a clue.
It's becoming increasingly apparent that the universe is nonlocal, which means that space and time are not fundamental to it.
We are part of the universe which means that we are nonlocal. Unity defines us, not separateness. That's not woo, that's physics.
I asked
@BrandonFugal
to put together a demonstration of his notability and he has kindly done this post.
Compare this to skeptic "great" Tim Farley, a software engineer who created
-wait for it-
a WEBSITE!!!
The hypocrisy is loud enough to make you deaf.
@Craigweiler
Thank you for shining a light on the blatant manipulation & dishonesty by editors on Wikipedia. Efforts for people to create a page on me continue to be blocked/deleted, even though I have been recognized as a leader in my industry for decades (including EY Entrepreneur of the…
The paranormal is completely explainable if you realize that consciousness is nonlocal because this means that we're filtering out extraneous information all the time. The paranormal is just information that exists on the border of what we filter out and what we keep.
I think one thing even the Guerrilla Skeptics don't realize is that they are selling atheistic materialism through their editing. It's not rationality, it's not scientific, it's just a belief system based on their underlying assumptions which they take for truth.
A pretty solid Japanese case of the reincarnation type with written records made before verifications: A child claiming to have fought on the battleship Yamato
Often compared to the American Leininger reincarnation case.
The older I get, the less impressed I am with most skepticism. Mostly, it's just incomplete knowledge and lack of research combined with hubris.
This particularly true when you realize how much our beliefs shape the reality we can experience.
Skeptics tell people that they don’t have psychic experiences. They convince themselves that they’re helping people be more rational, but what they’re really doing is just gaslighting.
The worst mistake a skeptic can make is to never doubt skepticism.
Assigning 100% credibility to skeptics and 0% credibility to anyone else is not skepticism, it's zealotry.
I've started writing an article on poltergeists. One thing that stands out is how well this unusual phenomena holds up to scientific investigation. When you remove the emotional "woo woo spoooooooky" aspect to it, it's quite fascinating. Written accounts date back to 530AD.
I've known about this problem for years, but Rob exposed how it's done. The Guerrilla Skeptics carefully navigate around Wikipedia rules to introduce skeptical bias into a wide ranging number of UAP, Parapsychology, alt medicine and paranormal topics.
@tyhenrymedium
Sort of. Researcher Stephan Schwartz has done relatively large experiments using remote viewing to have people visit the future and describe what they saw.
By using a lot of people, he was able to identify things that will happen in our society. For instance, this predicts 1/2
This is an article about a theory that links vibrations to consciousness because vibrations have a tendency to sync up.
From just the article, the flaw is that you can also see vibrations as a medium through which consciousness acts.
1 of 2
Our universe is conscious, which means that information, not physical objects is what we experience.
It follows that we experience far more than we are aware of, so our minds are curating our experiences, limiting the information input to useful stuff.
Parapsychology is one of those "Hiding in Plain Sight" subjects, like UAP's.
Once you start looking at the evidence, it takes quite some effort to dismiss it. The deeper you dive, the more you see that it's this weird blank spot that we collectively ignore.
Skeptics typically use the word "believer" in a derogatory way.
But if you weren't there yourself, or you didn't experience the same thing, then having an opinion makes you a believer too. somewhere along the way, you had to trust someone else's opinion. That's believing.
When I researched skeptics for my book and realized that they're all atheists, I saw them in a different light.
Skeptics appear to be a sub category of Anti-Theists. A more fitting description of them would be:
Evangelical Materialists.
They have some fanatical behavior.
Plants are conscious, and once this was discovered, we moved from regarding them as nearly inanimate, to seeing all sorts of interactions that they have with other plants and the environment. Here's the latest:
@tyhenrymedium
2/2 that we will have cheap energy and that Florida will be underwater by 2040. The worst effects of global warming are coming much sooner than we think.
The term pseudoscience is used a lot by skeptics.
Skeptics though, often make strong negative claims and demand that others disprove their assertions, then when others attempt to do so, the skeptic starts cherry picking the evidence they'll accept.
That's also pseudoscience.
The danger of pretending that we live in a material universe is that it is at odds with many experiences that people have. And where those experiences conflict with their understanding of science, the science is rejected, not the experience. Skeptics do not understand this.
You can only experience physical reality with consciousness. Everything about your interactions with that reality are consciousness.
So why do so many people ignore the importance of consciousness with regards to reality?
I think I see the problem here. How is one supposed to know the context of the sources if this is your attitude?
And does this mean that no one is reading the sources before using them? Or even considering alt. sources?
oy vey
@RobHeatherly1
@GoodTroubleShow
,
@FrancMilburn
Once upon a time I argued about scientific research into psychic ability with skeptics. So I did some research.
In only a few days I knew more about that research than any skeptic I encountered.
This told me something important about psi skepticism.
When you work through the logic properly and without prejudice, it's extremely difficult not to come to the conclusion that the universe isn't just conscious, it's made out of consciousness.
What's happening with the Guerrilla Skeptics may finally be the downfall of organized skepticism. It won't go away, but the world will finally be highly skeptical of skeptics. As it should be.
They aren't neutral, rational, nor critical thinkers; just believers with an agenda.
Psychic ability should be treated in science as something that we know exists, but that we must study in order to understand.
It is only exotic in the minds of skeptics. Most of the world knows what it is, even if it's difficult to define.
@Sebasti09942108
Neuroscience in no way prepares you to comment on philosophy of the mind. It tells you nothing about experience, only brain functions.
You cannot look at the mechanics of the brain and expect to find anything about what it's like to live a life.
By slapping a pseudoscience label on anything they don't like, the Guerrilla Skeptics can use it as justification to smear people and subjects they don't like on Wikipedia.
They have admin control so there's nothing anyone can do about it.
His time on earth is coming to an end today. He has a tumor growing in his nose and throat. He has to be bottle fed, IV fluids and various drugs to keep him going and now he has too much trouble just breathing.
We have a vet coming this afternoon to give him a peaceful death.
@jacobpanas1
@perlmutations
Hate to break it to you, but Detroit lost its industry to capalistic pressures, over which its citizens had absolutely no vote. It’s also why you probably have a lousy job and can’t get ahead in life. That’s capitalism, not voting.
Consciousness, as far as anyone can tell, is nonlocal. AI however, is definitely part of our material reality.
You cannot replicate nonlocality with locality.
In other words, AI will never be able to think because it cannot transcend its physical roots.
The Mirror Worlds research showed that psychic functioning is mostly defensive in nature. We are spending most of our energy shutting out other people out and closing ourselves off from that connection.
Given how much fear there is in the world, this is probably for the better.
I’m working with
@RobHeatherly1
on the Guerrilla Skeptics project.
#uaptwitter
I reached out to him after the
@GoodTroubleShow
interview.
This is my area of expertise and I’ve been able to provide background info and direction.
I’ve been down this road before.
I have been studying people who identify as skeptics for a long time and I've come to the conclusion that their form of skepticism doesn't have a lot to do with rational thought.
It's largely just reactionary and almost entirely based on a fear of being wrong. 1/2
In this article they're going on about how someone has to prove retrocausality. Parapsychology been there, done that. Apparently precognition now has permission to be real.
Something I've thought about:
Is our perception of what's conscious or not just a limitation of our ability to perceive?
Do we assume that rocks aren't conscious solely because we can't even conceive of a way to interact with them? Is life necessary for consciousness? IDK
“You should not be afraid of someone who has a library and reads many books… you should fear someone who has only one book… and he considers it sacred… but has never read it…”
~ Friedrich Nietzsche
The problem of acceptance of parapsychology is not scientific. By the standards of any science, psychic ability is proven as much as anything can be.
The problem is social. It's a PR problem and will only be solved through PR type activity. The door has to be kicked in.
Today is the birthday of my intellectual hero JB Rhine (1895-1980), pioneering ESP researcher and founder of the Parapsychology Lab
@DukeU
. JB inspired almost all who knew him. I have an article landing soon about his legacy. In a rare image, JB huddles with Duke students c. 1950
I always cringe when I see people using math to describe consciousness. Math is good at finding relationships and comparing things, but you need something to measure. Consciousness is immaterial though. What are you going to measure?
One of the problems that the Guerrilla skeptics create is the illusion that strongly anomalous experiences are not real and are the result of mental health issues.
It is quite harmful to treat people this way. I have personally talked to many who were at their breaking point.
@anitaleirfall
Yes. A thousand times yes.
How else do you explain that experience is as fundamental as it gets? And experience doesn’t exist without thought.
In a new paper, we show that directed human intention can affect electrical plasma. Learn about what this could mean for our understanding of mind-matter interaction:
@tyhenrymedium
It’s not just a religion thing. Most skepticism of the paranormal is just this sort of fear. This is one of my areas of study.
Their contempt and anger is a mask for this fear.
Every method that we have for examining reality can be reduced to consciousness examining itself.
This should be taught as both basic science and philosophy. If you don't understand that, a lot of stuff either isn't going to make sense or be very convoluted.
We had to attend a wedding this afternoon and when we got home our cat had already passed.
The vet arrived shortly later, but there was nothing for her to do.
Rest In Peace Sadie.
My latest article for PDN:
Here I look at the evidence for dowsing and find something surprising. All of the skepticism towards this rests on one single skeptical criticism that used questionable statistics.
Relativity in physics literally means: "Relative to the observer."
Physics is also relational: It literally means: "Relational according to the observer."
Epistemologically? this is meaning. But the Physical is meaningless.
Reality then, must have meaning. (consciousness)
Ten years after I addressed this in my book, it’s nice to see that the Guerrilla Skeptics are getting called out again.
I hope things change, but history suggests it won’t.
Rob, I am tremendously thankful for all of your support, and the support of so many others in this community. Honestly it's a bit overwhelming at times, but in a good way. This was never about a personal disparagement towards Mick West. It was about what I saw to be a long…
@Lynda_Research
I'm part of the group that's looking into it. It's all real. The group is called the Guerrilla Skeptics. I first reported on them ten years ago.
Coming soon!
This is a magazine for the general public with articles about the science of psychic ability and other edge sciences written for the lay person.
The gang at Paranormal Daily News are in talks with Schiffer Publishing to create a paranormal Imprint.
The Mirror World Studies showed that our beliefs get into our subconscious, which alters our perception to confirm them. This affects our intuition.
Whether through a thousand small decisions or a few big ones, this has a huge impact on our lives.
We're going to lose our 19 year old cat very soon. She went to the vet with a temperature and she has hernia which has strangulated her intestines. Too old for surgery, which we couldn't afford anyway.
We're keeping her comfortable until we can get a vet here to euthanize her.
I don't think that you can understand reality even a little bit scientifically without using the amassed evidence for psychic ability.
It fills in a lot of blanks.
Psychic ability can be found in every culture throughout history. It occurs in every demographic and socio economic group.
From a science perspective, it should not be surprising at all that it shows up in experiments.
Reincarnation and near death experience researcher
@GregoryShushan
has been attempting to edit a Wikipedia page on near death experiences. He's avoided the boot for edit warring, but must contend with a stubborn GS editor: worth a read:
My experience with the recently deceased is that they take their emotional side with them, but not intellectual beliefs.
It's more what you did and less what you thought. Your arguments don't go with you, but how you felt about them does.
It's all about emotional growth.
The physical world is bound by time. Consciousness is not. So we watch time move forward and we watch our bodies age, but our awareness isn't in lockstep with this this. We don't feel time pass the way the physical world experiences it.
Skeptics of psychic phenomena struggle with holistic information. i.e. billions of people have psychic experiences. That removes many skeptical arguments because of the huge number. But they can't see that.
Fooling yourself explains a few people. It does not explain billions.
I've noticed on more than one occasion, (ok, all the damned time) that idealists understand materialism, but materialists are completely clueless about idealism.