Parliament has been dissolved and this account will not be active until after the General Election. Contact us at esic@parliament.uk.

We have received a proposed negative statutory instrument on revoking certain railways retained EU law (assimilated law from 1 January 2024) and amendments to existing legislation consequential on those revocations. You can read details and comment here:

We have received a proposed negative statutory instrument on revoking pieces of assimilated law which have expired or are no longer applicable following EU exit. You can read full details and comment on our public engagement portal until 27 November:

We've recommended that the Data Protection (Fundamental Rights and Freedoms) (Amendment) Regulations 2023 should be subject to the affirmative procedure. You can read why in our report:

We have received a proposed negative statutory instrument on restating certain rights derived from the EUI Convention. You can read full details and make comments on our public engagement portal until 16 October:

We have received a proposed negative statutory instrument on amending references to ‘fundamental rights and freedoms’ in the UK’s data protection legislation. You can read full details and make comments on our public engagement portal until 16 October:

We have received the first proposed negative under the REUL Act. You can read full details and comment on our public engagement portal:

At our meeting on Tuesday, the Committee considered proposed negative instruments on agricultural products, the exporting of mercury and on the storage of carbon dioxide. We didn't recommend either for an upgrade. You can read our full report here:

At our meeting on Tuesday, the Committee considered a proposed negative instrument on renewable energy regulation after Brexit. We didn't recommend it for an upgrade. You can read our full report here:

We have received 2 proposed negative statutory instruments on product safety and renewable energy regulation after Brexit. You can read full details and comment on our public engagement portal: https://t.co/fH9f4lXC5i @beisgovuk

At our meeting on Tuesday, the Committee considered proposed negative instruments on animal food and on EU training agencies. We didn't recommend either for an upgrade. You can read our full report here:

We wrote to @hmtreasury to express our concern about a wide range of complex topics being covered in a single negative statutory instrument - read in full here:

At our meeting on Tuesday, the Committee considered proposed negative instruments on European Parliamentary elections and on financial services legislation. We didn't recommend either for an upgrade. You can read our full report here:

We have received a proposed negative statutory instrument on the revocation of regulations relating to EU training agencies. You can read full details and make comments on our public engagement portal until 5 September: https://t.co/iGpjsMxSEI @educationgovuk

We have received a proposed negative statutory instrument on animal, food and plant health. We will consider its legal and political implications - you can read full details and make comments on our public engagement portal until 5 September: https://t.co/UJ0LS3QXRe @DefraGovUK

We have received a proposed negative statutory instrument on financial services legislation. We will consider its legal and political implications - you can read the full details and make comments on our public engagement portal until 18 July: https://t.co/y6LJRr0yQ5 @hmtreasury

We have received a proposed negative statutory instrument on European Parliamentary elections. We will consider its legal and political implications - you can read full details and make comments on our public engagement portal until 18 July: https://t.co/WbWYgZm711 @CommonsLUHC

Welcome to our new member, @MpHendrick – we look forward to working with you.

ESIC's remit will not be extended, Leader of the House @Mark_Spencer told @CommonsProcCom last week: "The number of SIs we are talking about is miniscule and it would require primary legislation to undo that." Read the full session here:

ESIC would be open to discussion about how its role might develop and about the usefulness of sifting in implementing changes to the wider body of retained EU law. (5/5)