Research published by for-profit companies has nearly tripled, leading to rising APCs and excessive paywalls. So we started a nonprofit journal where you can publish and peer review for charity, or even get paid to peer review. Link 👇. #medtwitter #academia #research

🎯🎯🎯🎯.“…the strain on academic publishing could be substantially alleviated if funding agencies stipulated that the work they support must be published in non-profit journals”. #research #AcademicTwitter .

was built after my frustration with doing the same types of analyses over and over again. As long as data storage is reasonable, it will be a free home for my fellow #meded enthusiasts. @MedEdFlamingo @Midwest_MedPeds @NephroP @mededdoc.

Looking for statistical comparisons? With just a few clicks, you can compare aggregate scores across paired and unpaired samples or compare individual question responses for survey questions.

Get detailed analytics on assessment responses. Not just how the learners did, but how the assessment did, analyzing internal reliability, psychometrics, and giving an aggregate rating. See how learners perform among all the subscales/subdomains you declared to direct teaching

Looking for something more fun? Gamify your assessment. MedEd Assessments will take your subscales/subdomains and automatically convert them to Jeopardy categories with an interactive game board and live scoring

Create test instances to separate pre/post or sample groups that you are assessing. Then easily create unique links that you can send to learners for deploying.

Or create your own assessments, containing MCQs, survey questions, free text questions. Add images and categorize questions under sub-domains for more analytic capabilities.

Want to find an assessment already out there? The site hosts two repositories: 1 completely public and 1 for verified instructors (so learners can't easily access). With the click of a button, you can duplicate an assessment, edit it, and deploy it yourself

For my fellow #meded enthusiasts who do surveys and assessments, I built a one-stop website to do it all:.Build assessments.Get responses.Analyze psychometric.Calculate statistical differences.Host gamified assessments.And more. Let me show you the FREE MedEd Assessments

When you’re reviewing an article and see “—“ all over the place

RT @NephroP: #POCUS is part of the physical exam and must be thoughtfully integrated into clinical decision-making to add real value. Like….

Kind of surprised we have a benra AECOPD trial (ABRA) and now a mepo AECOPD trial. But no dupi AECOPD trial yet, which has the most favorable data for chronic management of eosinophilic COPD. #pulmonary #pulmTwitter

Peer reviewers donate over $1.5 billion annually in labor. Mostly to 5 multibillion-dollar publishers that have profit margins larger than Google. Today, we have the tech to free research from profiteering.@kevinmd . #AcademicTwitter #medtwitter .

RT @jbcarmody: This week, the president issued an executive order targeting medical education accreditors. This is big news - and the inte….

You can buy research article co-authorship for $1,800. We’re going to see more and more of this if we let the #residency research arms race continue…. #MedTwitter #medschool #AcademicTwitter

RT @bowersbrainsurg: Huge thanks to @JPGK_MD & Dr. Wang of @UMneurosurgery for inviting me on the pod to share this passion project of my c….

#Academia has a lot to learn from tech. I’m able to use 80,000 lines of free open-source code on the MIT license. But it’s $104 to read the one research article I need.

A controversial congressional probe is looking into antitrust practices by the Match. I mean, the Match is basically the definition of a trust. But do the pros outweigh the cons?. #MatchDay #Match2025.

Check out the journal:. And sign up to be a reviewer:.