AngryFleas Profile Banner
Angry Fleas Profile
Angry Fleas

@AngryFleas

Followers
4K
Following
136K
Media
65K
Statuses
352K

Facts matter. Reality™ always wins. Blocked by those maintaining safe-space echo chambers. Unfollowed by those tired of constant "2+2 does indeed equal 4".

Joined April 2020
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@AngryFleas
Angry Fleas
4 years
We do not mind being questioned; we never block.
271
14
217
@AngryFleas
Angry Fleas
8 hours
@shipwreckedcrew The government was relying on 8 U.S.C. § 1231 to detain him, which only authorizes detention after a "final order of removal" is entered. Xinis ruled that you cannot use an "implied" or "concluded" status to satisfy the strict requirement of a final order for detention purposes.
5
1
3
@AngryFleas
Angry Fleas
10 hours
@WallStreetApes There's no indictment because it was never a crime to reveal the scope and scale of the Russian 2016 election interference op to the American people. Trump's angry Obama didn't keep it secret.
0
3
13
@AngryFleas
Angry Fleas
10 hours
POTUS cannot pardon state convictions. Every high school civics student understands this. #civics101
@ninoboxer
David Nino Rodriguez
13 hours
This is going to BLOW UP! A legal showdown is forming around Tina Peters. A pardon was issued, but the state says it won’t comply... the standoff begins, folks.
2
2
12
@AngryFleas
Angry Fleas
11 hours
Believing a lie doesn't give you a free pass to break the law. The J6 defendants were arrested for violent entry, assaulting law enforcement, and/or attempting to halt the peaceful transfer of power. https://t.co/K5aP4KpY8v
3
2
13
@AngryFleas
Angry Fleas
11 hours
Tina Peters never found evidence of fraud. In fact, she certified the official 2020 election results in her county in Colorado, where Trump won by a landslide.
@barttracytx
Bart Tracy
16 hours
@truestormyjoe She’s part of a federal case and has evidence of the rigged stolen 2020 election reason @POTUS can pardon her and @realDonaldTrump will now send in US Marshal’s to free her.
2
2
14
@AngryFleas
Angry Fleas
15 hours
Some J6 defendants steadfastly maintain an "alternative reality" where Trump won the 2020 election, making (in their mind) their actions righteous and justified. Example: https://t.co/IBizUF8K9U
6
1
14
@AngryFleas
Angry Fleas
15 hours
Removing the time limit on interim U.S. Attorneys would likely be unconstitutional, because it would allow the President to have rolling appointments without any consent of the Senate.
@Rickisback_ON_X
John Reese - Person of Interest
1 day
The Senate does not have to give up their Blue Slips. All they have to do is change the law regarding the 120-day time limit on Interim USA's. Remove the part that allows the court to appoint the replacement. Problem solved.
0
2
7
@AngryFleas
Angry Fleas
15 hours
2/ In high school, every civics class student learns why we have an independent judiciary and checks and balances across our three branches of government. Education is important.
1
0
0
@AngryFleas
Angry Fleas
15 hours
POTUS is the Quarterback; he runs the offense and is the most important person on the field. The Judge is the Referee. The Referee isn't "more powerful"/more famous than the Quarterback, but if a rule is broken, the Referee has the authority to throw a flag & stop the play.
@perinejennifer5
America First Patriot Jennifer 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
15 hours
@AngryFleas District/federal court judges do not have more power than the president of the United States no matter how much you try to spin and skew that fact.
8
3
15
@AngryFleas
Angry Fleas
15 hours
2/ If a candidate can't accept election results and Court rulings, they shouldn't be running for office in the first place.
0
0
3
@AngryFleas
Angry Fleas
16 hours
The term "Insurrection" is sometimes used for January 6th because it was an effort to use violence or the threat of violence to prevent the winning candidate from taking power after an election.
@RedPilledNurse
RedPilledNurse
18 hours
There was no insurrection on January 6, 2021!
3
3
9
@AngryFleas
Angry Fleas
1 day
This interpretation misses the point of Checks and Balances. While the President has broad powers, he is not a King; he is subject to the law just like anyone else. If POTUS breaks the law or violates the Constitution, a federal judge absolutely has the authority to stop him.
@perinejennifer5
America First Patriot Jennifer 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
1 day
3
6
12
@AngryFleas
Angry Fleas
1 day
Criminal leadership does not have to physically visit the crime scene to be criminally liable. For example, Osama Bin Laden did not personally fly the planes.
@MHowellTweets
Mike Howell
1 day
“Look at Enrique Tarrio. The man was sentenced to 22 years in prison when he wasn't even on the property on January 6.” @realpfp on @FinePointOAN @OANN
3
4
15
@AngryFleas
Angry Fleas
1 day
The judicial branch has the exclusive authority to interpret laws. @badlegaltakes👇
@compressier
SkiBum4Life
1 day
@WallStreetMav U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis has ZERO jurisdiction over executive branch
3
4
16
@AngryFleas
Angry Fleas
2 days
@TheBrancaShow Melania Trump is a DUAL citizen - by your argument, Barron's US citizenship would be in question. Does that make sense to you?
3
2
13
@AngryFleas
Angry Fleas
2 days
Election data is public; submit a public records request to your election office.
@natespopve76659
Knight2dayagain
3 days
@AngryFleas How do we know how many paper ballots were cast? When? Where? Hie many and manner of adjudication? Fleas digs deeper hole into his inability to speak to truth for elections.
4
2
11
@AngryFleas
Angry Fleas
3 days
@TheStormRedux What’s been preventing Trump from sharing the evidence he claimed he had five years ago?
5
2
12
@AngryFleas
Angry Fleas
2 days
When Trump stood in front of the crowd at the Ellipse, he told them they were going to the Capitol and that they needed to "fight" to save the country. Many did exactly that.
@TerryinSoCalif
Terry
2 days
@DavidJHarrisJr The Twitter video that was taken down by Jack at the time and reinstated by Elon with X shows he did not incite. So who’s paying for this nonsense? 5 years ago and the J6 committee needs to be held accountable for their fraudulent actions
4
3
12
@AngryFleas
Angry Fleas
2 days
@CynicalPublius The "No Kings" protests were responses to those who thought they were electing a King.
2
2
13
@AngryFleas
Angry Fleas
2 days
@WadeMiller Having “allegiance” to someone else doesn’t exclude you from the full jurisdiction of our laws. Break the law, and you’re going to jail just like anyone else.
3
2
20