
0xprincess
@0x9212ce55
Followers
7K
Following
23K
Media
313
Statuses
6K
mev extracting unicorn | founder @nuconstruct
Joined April 2019
lmao twitter has duplicated my original post for some reason. Quoting my follow-up from a duplicate under this one since it got more impressions.
Such a product is definitely net positive for the ecosystem, it just shouldn't be described as some sort of magic airdrop money printer, because most users won't be able to see through it. There's a similar thing with CowSwap on Ethereum, where the difference between the result.
0
0
5
It's always strange to me to hear that someone's calling arbitrage kickbacks an "earn" or "rewards". This is not additional money, it's a fractional return of the loss you just took by deciding to trade on chain. This is solved with a PMM DEX model - you'll just get better trades.
users and apps should be able to earn the rewards that their transactions create. with this, they now can. before, they were cut out of the process. there's a lot of misinformation that goes on with this stuff, generally due to dishonesty or just a lack of understanding. but this.
2
2
43
Hope you won't miss it! I genuinely enjoyed it, didn't have such a thoughtful conversation for a long time. Ethereum is all you need.
Ethereum is all you need . New Deeply Intents podcast featuring @0x9212ce55 coming tomorrow.
7
9
79
I think the main reason why most blockchains have not adopted async execution is simple: when users see that their tx is confirmed, they expect the result to be available as their further actions depend on it. While with deferred execution it's possible to locally simulate the.
Doing some writing today about asynchronous execution (aka deferred execution). This is one of the "big ideas" of Monad that will seem obvious in hindsight: that as soon as transaction order is determined, state is determined. You might not know this, but in most blockchains.
9
4
23
RT @mteamisloading: Super excited to launch our first mainnet product! DA Builder is a core piece of our vision for a based Ethereum with p….
0
9
0
I'm actually surprised nobody has done it already. It should be possible with the RFQ model and it's kinda easy to implement for solver-based bridges imo. Uniswap also has an edge here but for some reason this is not an option in their UI even though they use RFQ most of the time.
How do you send *exactly* 1000 USDC to an address on chain B if your assets are on chain A?. Bridging takes an unpredictable cut, so you have to send more than 1000. And you'll end up with dust left over on chain B.
0
0
6
>apps and infrastructure that empower people instead of MEV bots. I wrote a thread on it a long time ago, but still don't understand how this problem is being effectively addressed. For the overwhelming majority of the population, identity (especially some obscure blockchain ID).
2/ World is building the first human-centered blockchain. Their flagship World ID protocol uses ZK to verify proof of humanness on @World_Chain_, creating a foundation for apps and infrastructure that empower people instead of MEV bots.
2
0
22
It's easy to understand why maximalism is stupid if you're at least a little bit technical. "I want all the planes to be Boeing 747 bc it's big and cool, Cessnas don't have a chance."."I want everyone to drive Toyotas bc they're reliable and affordable"."e=mc2 is the only winning.
being close minded about other blockchains isn't being "faithful" or "loyal" it's maximalism and it's stupid.
4
0
31
This is an interesting topic to think about. Imo, L2s are definitely taking advantage over L1 and I wrote a lot about it previously. But at the same time, it's what makes Ethereum so attractive to large fintech players. In my book, being taken advantage of is not something to.
the ethereum roadmap after capitulating to the idea that L2s are parasitic and then discovering, moments later, that robinhood and stripe are launching… L2s
5
2
39