Neal Yuan, MD
@yuanneal
Followers
88
Following
2
Media
1
Statuses
27
Cardiologist at SFVA/UCSF s/p | CedarsSinai | UCSF IM | Princeton. Echo, telehealth, digital health, machine learning, cardiac rehab
Joined August 2011
@MKIttlesonMD A tip fr tech/design: There’s no such thing as “User error”, only mismatches b/t the right technology for the right Pts/clinicians. Remote care might be convenient but requires thoughtful implementation and might not be for everyone. Know when your patient needs to come in.
1
0
5
😆 Nearly impossible to be as pithy/wise as @MKittlesonMD. But here's my best shot at a lesson from this study. #CircHFJC /1
Q7: Last question! In honor of Dr. Kittleson (senior author of your paper), can you provide us with one #YuanRule? (I had to) #CircHFJC @yuanneal #Yuanrules #Kittlesonrules #Tipsfornewdocs @WilcoxHeart @CountryPumpDoc @NMHheartdoc
2
0
3
A6: ❓Outcomes: Does use result in better process measures, long term outcomes? ❓Cost-effectiveness: Is the 🍋 worth the squeeze? Are the infrastructure/personnel costs worth the benefits gained? Are there other cheaper/easier ways of getting at the same information?#CircHFJC /3
0
0
2
A5: Some ?s on my mind: Which HF patients may still do ok with remote visits? Can we compensate for remote visit shortcoming if we use video visits + the right remote monitoring devices Prospective trials. Always potential confounding by indication w/ retro study. #CircHFJC 1/1
Q5: What is on the horizon for remote care in HF- both research and clinical care? #CircHFJC @yuanneal
@AHajduczok @hvanspall @KevinShahMD @mpsotka
0
0
1
A4: ⭐️Awareness of providing less care compared to in-person. Are you not ordering meds/tests b/c u can’t get clear a history/exam? ⭐️Recognize that remote visits (esp video) might not be for everyone. Some may need to come into the office for proper management. #CircHFJC 3/3
0
0
1
A4: Clearly, remote care has tons to offer for improving accessibility, but like any new technology, there will be a learning curve. Here are some ⭐️ to think about for improving remote care: #CircHFJC /1
Q4: How can we use these findings to improve our delivery of remote care, both on an individual (patient-clinician) level and on a systems level? @yuanneal
#CircHFJC #implementation @SJGreene_md @ankeetbhatt
1
1
3
A3: Next step is definitely to consider other CV conditions. We might not see major differences in outcomes in conditions that are less exam intensive. E.g. CAD, a high risk condition, but might still be OK to monitor remotely if you can get a good history. #CircHFJC 2/2
0
0
1
A3: Patients with HF were our first grp of interest b/c they seemed to be highest risk. i.e. high rates of admissions, mortality and often require more physical exam monitoring that might be challenging over remote visits. #CircHFJC /1
Q3: How do these findings compare to data on delivery of remote care for other disease processes? How is HF unique or not unique? @gcfmd @HeartDocSadiya @WilcoxHeart @FarazA_MD @ersied727
1
0
1
But interestingly, we found that non-white Pts made up similar if not higher proportion of video visits. Also true for telephone visits. /2
2
0
1
A2: Race/ethnicity. B/c of association b/t race and SES, had hypothesized that non-white Pts might have less access to internet, devices, and therefore video visits. /1
Q2: Can you comment on the differences seen in visit types among different racial, gender, and socioeconomic groups? @KBreathettMD
@amorrismd
@AditiNayakMD @UREssien @DrNasrien
1
0
3