VB
@vicky4861
Followers
482
Following
5K
Media
654
Statuses
6K
It's nice to be important, but it's important to be nice. Cricket lover, follow me for cricket specialist tweets.
India, England, & Texas
Joined February 2011
While building team for future, India forgotten the experience players who are there but got ignored. Shami, Bhuvi, Rahane, Rohit, Kohli, Ashwin, Pujara, Ishant, Umesh Jadeja where the real reason for India's test dominance. #TeamIndia #GautamGambhir
0
0
0
Indian team management needs to understand that selection in India should be backed by experience in International Cricket+ Domestic Ranji stats. Selection is based on IPL Indian team getting eliminated by Bangladesh in India A Asia cups says a lot about IPL players. #INDvsSA
0
0
0
Just think about it. Starc at the age of 36 bowling at his best. And Indian best fast bowler in test Ishant last played in 2021 and he is now 37 year old. #IndianCricket
0
0
0
Who is ready to get out in the streets after India win the World Cup? #INDvsSA
#INDWvsSAW
0
0
2
Who is ready to get out in the streets after India win the World Cup? #INDvsSA
0
0
0
Today it's No Rohit fans not Virat fans it's just Indian fans who were smiling seeing two person doing the same things again on the ground which they doing for last 15 years #RoKo #INDvsAUS #RohitSharma #Vira
0
0
0
There was time when Ganguly Sachin and Dravid used to Play at top 3 in ODI And then came in Rohit Shikhar and Virat What next? Shubhman + ?+? #INDvsAUS
0
0
0
Remember India had lost to SA in 2011 WC and rest is history. #INDWvSAW
0
0
0
Rohit Sharma is not that fancy for Brands and Sponsors. After MSD they transfer with Kohli and we can see empty stadiums when RoKo is not there. BCCI is trying to create a Star Shubhman by playing him in all format and giving him Captaincy. #RohitSharmašµ
0
0
1
Hey @BCCI @SonySportsNetwk š¬ Can we PLEASE get a full-length movie on the #AndersonTendulkarTrophy 2025? Imagine reliving the drama, intensity & iconic moments from all 5 Tests in one epic film! š„š„ The teams deserve this masterpiece! š #INDvsENG
0
0
0
Letās raise questions, but with context. Letās debate, but with dignity. And most of allāletās listen before judging. š If this thread helped you see the full picture, do like & repost. What are your thoughtsāwas it fair criticism or a misjudged moment?
0
0
0
12. Final Thought: Premanand Maharaj's intention was likely to promote emotional purity and stable relationshipsānot to shame anyone. But even saints must be careful: one line can overshadow an entire message.
1
0
0
11. What's the Takeaway? This isn't just about one saint or one statement. Itās about: š¹ Communication vs Miscommunication š¹ Tradition vs Modernity š¹ Understanding the full picture before reacting
1
0
0
10. A Fake Angle Added More Confusion šµ A fake social media post attributed to Disha Pataniās sister criticizing Maharaj went viralābut she clarified: ā She said nothing ā
Asked for restraint and fact-checking
1
0
0
9. The Role of Spiritual Figures šļø Spiritual leaders are held to high standards. Even if the message is valid, the delivery must evolve with societyās changing sensitivities. Words matter. And they carry weight.
1
0
0
8. Why It Still Sparked Outrage š„ Because the clip touched a nerve. India is debating gender, purity culture, and modern values. And when a saint uses terms like āimpure women,ā it triggers fears of moral policingāeven if intent was different.
1
0
0
7. What He Was Actually Saying š ā”ļø Multiple relationships can leave behind emotional scars ā”ļø They can cause mental comparisons in marriage ā”ļø These lead to distrust, impatience, and ultimately, relationship failure
1
0
0
6. The ā4 out of 100ā Line: A Slip or a Statement? That line about purity? Even his followers admitāit was a debatable, even unfortunate choice of words. Possibly a tongue slip or an overgeneralizationābut not necessarily his core message.
1
0
0
5. Was It Just About Women? š¤·āāļø No. In many of his other discourses, Maharaj speaks equally about both genders, often urging both men and women to live mindfully and ethically. He wasnāt assigning blame to one sideāthough this particular line made it appear that way.
1
0
0