This would help widen our window by another 20 yrs which will help us achieve better economic resilience to weather the storm.

By allowing for targetted immigration not only can India not get back valuable people from its cultural roots, it can also help prolong the upcoming demographic debacle.

Hence, careful planning and monitoring of immigration is extremely critical.

For a country like India which has just a 20-25 year window, keeping a replacement level tfr is important.

We have already seen the impact of drop in fertility is on developed nations, even those with high incomes and generous welfare states.

Barring 4-5 states all states in India are less than replacement level.

There should careful balancing and calibration to ensure that these measures are taken to handle the depleting birth rates.

Outside of these groups immigration to India must be restricted. These groups must be placed in areas where there are demographic challenges.

Such a project could benefit India deeply. Trumps ban on H1B is a blessing in disguise. For India to create an environment to harness its intellectual capital.

Moreover, a new diaspora city must be made to get Newer generation Indian immigrants from the West. This could be a hiteck science city cum SEZ with fast track regulations, a sea port, cleaner air, greater stand of living, easier business policy and cutting edge tech research

Ethnic groups like Chindians, Balinese, Vietnamese Cham, Russian Hindus, Ghanese Hindus, some revivalist pagan Romas also must be included.

Multi generational diaspora from Fiji, Guyana, Suriname, West Indies, Mauritius, Uganda, Kenya, Malyasia, Singapore.

Burmese Hindus, Bhutanese, Nepalese, Tibetans, Chakmas, Sri Lankan Hindus need to be added.

Hence, the CAA itself needs to be expanded to include more groups within its ambit.

Its important that different groups are placed separately in terms of allowance of immigration.

So a person of Tibetan origin may fit well as an immigrant in India but not someone from lets say neighbouring Xinjiang.

Culturally similar nations and possibly nations which have reasonable standards of crime enforcement become important.

However one aspect that needs to be studied is cultures or nationalities from where immigrant pool is taken in.

After all its not elites themselves that are oppressive. It is the manner in which people reach their elite status that requires addressal. If heredity benefits alone should lead to benefits or should actual merit.

Infact quality immigration of highly intelligent people else improve the outcomes for local populace too.