Ugh, I wrote a bit of a philosophical comment. Then a bot or something retweeted it. This is so Deleuze: glitches as difference & repetition, rrrrrhizomes:))))) Anyway, I read more than I write.

Wang speaks from a stupid angle where the world is just a cloud for competence & efficiency, he improvises this idea of 'vibe coding at 13' while shifting in his chair, back and forth, trying to make sense. On his cap it says 'godspeed', the detail is so accidental, almost

‘ai+art’ adaptive spaces that respond, transform, variation as meaning

‘Over time, the exhibiting space becomes an archive of people's presence and evidence of how all of us are connected to others, past and present. (…) The same experience is never repeated.’ Maja Petric https://t.co/ucN5ZqYtrl

the ‘ai + movies/art’ debate is kinda stuck in a ‘tools problem’:))) that’s a false premise because it starts from the idea that some people think other people don’t have an aesthetic sense or something:) art doesn’t function on social media or online, but in conceptual spaces,

i went to a museum, i like artsy installations (very much) :) this one had journal texts running on old tvs like prompts (oh), subversive. the one i liked (the photo is kinda low-fi, en fin) it’s written like a log between 2 messages with no aesthetic intention & that’s exactly

The difference between ‘AI companies lose money’ & ‘infrastructure buildout’ is the difference between looking at a Q3 & seeing the historical shift. WAP vs 5G, copper vs fiber. Those were easier to understand than GPUs. If you didn’t build then, if you didn’t dig or mount

I have the default reaction of someone still in touch with the asphalt, the concrete, the exhaustion, the hustling with less (so the mps doesn’t crash) & who suddenly sees that part of the world already lives in a moral simulation, panicked by a future apocalypse written in

I’d probably lose it if I could make this joke with Sora 2, but no avail, so I just render it in my head and laugh.

Can someone tell Sam Altman we might mess up his ‘AI Doom’ in Eastern Europe? We’ll just ask AGI to build us roads, we’ve already funded three trips to Mars and still drive on lunar terrain. AI Doom, AGI singing manele about ‘vai de GPU-urile mele’ at 3 am in Obor. Just saying.

This was before the prize draw switched from ‘Google Cloud’ to ‘Google Loud’

Google Cloud Day RO 2025. They totally messed up the prize draw lists, the wheel kept drawing the same ppl. We end up ‘debug the ppl’, yelled ‘the list is wrong’. The guy on stage: ‘no, this is what I received.’ Then we shout ‘round 2, undo’, ‘Microsoft’ etc. The guy leaves,

[Culture differences] In my culture, AI is just a tool, we don’t stress ourselves over it. It’s just shared knowledge. It’s an extension of that ‘we don’t have it, but we’ll make it’ sort of mindset. Maybe because our internet culture was born from lag. It’s a culture that

‘It's so funny being this age and living through one of these cyclical moments. Yeah, I don't think we really had that for our generation before, of seeing the starting point and having the full circle moment.’ https://t.co/XgdOaiQVEH

‘if u ran the world’ is superb. it kinda reminded me of all the broken toys from childhood, the ones that stayed my favorites anyway. that gravity (orbital) in between, like between frames, what happened from one age to another, back and forth. now & then

side/note: this is the fp16 reference you were looking for, probably:) https://t.co/xx8s3Wut5O

The (inter)net is on a discursive loop. It's a 'regime' of enunciation that produces (generates) its own reality. I remember the old discussions about hyperreality (Baudrillard:) ['sphere of meaning']

The whole discussion about LLMs and ‘reasoning’ holds on to the nostalgia of a platonic ideal: the rule is more real than the effect, the symbol is more real than the concept (real math, real programming, real cognition & so on). Wittgenstein already said it: the rule does not

Biologics are finally catching up with ideas that have existed in philosophy for over 70 years. The body not as a set of parts, but as a dynamic, recursive field of interactions. If behavior is just signal propagation, where exactly can agency be located & whether it exists apart

The french critical canon (postwar french criticism & ‘auteur theory’) is the voice of a generation that wrote about film as rehearsal for authorship. ‘Auteur theory’ was more of an autobiographical strategy. Brody is right: ‘They were not actually critics. They were masquerading