The patriarchy wouldn't have "persisted." It would have crumbled within generations, no matter how violently men swung the stick You can't have brute force shaping a formless sect into centuries of civilization it only brings destruction without a daily indispensable glue

If you're calling men's patriarchal enforcement "misogyny" even when it's driven by said massive profit;

It's raw "I can, so I will" Opportunistic dominance The stronger party sees an opening to control, exploit, or take, and they do it because the rewards roll in: status, resources, sex, legacy, glory, thrill. The part can be stronger physically, institutionally, socially

Women having zero of that biological/societal dominance position men held for millennia. No strength edge, no institutional power, no empire-building payoff. Yet they still viciously enabled enforced the norms of men on other women What does that make women ? Demons ?

If owning, slaving, raping, degrading women "because subhuman genitals" was the purest, most essential form of hate like you claim then let's see you explaining this :

Now would you be surprised to learn that IT WAS NEVER MEANT TO ? Men spill blood, conquer, rape, traffic, dominate because it pays their massive dividends : Blood and Glory , sexual access, raw thrill of unchallenged power

Because it's always been cold, opportunistic power play, not emotional woman hating tears. No brainpower required beyond 'I can, so I will.' It's a different beast entirely Structural dominance that doesn't bother with hate, just hierarchy.

Women ; they upheld the rules men set because it gave them scraps of power in a system that rewarded compliance You know why ?

You list rape, murder, trafficking, abuse, domestic servitude, cultural degradation etc All women have been living on the same planet since men doing this Because if this shit has gone on for centuries unchecked, where do you think the enforcement came from?