@sideen_dan
Dan Sideen
3 years
Renewables are providing a whopping 5% of German electricity. (Biomass doesn't count). Still want to close those nuclear plants?
Tweet media one
12
27
94

Replies

@BieglerTom
Tom Biegler
3 years
@sideen_dan To my mind power figures are useless. Need energy outputs over an adequate period. One year would be good.
5
0
2
@sideen_dan
Dan Sideen
3 years
@BieglerTom Well, except you need to meet demand every second to avoid blackouts.
1
0
7
@TFaulersack
DerFaulersack
3 years
@sideen_dan The dumb part is that a lot of windturbines are turned of regulary. The percentage of renewables could be much higher if the german politicians would stop saving coal for no economical reason at all.
1
0
0
@sideen_dan
Dan Sideen
3 years
@TFaulersack I think you'll find that wind turbines are only turned off when there is too much power. Grids require a substantial amount of rotating inertia to maintain stability & only coal, gas or nuclear can provide that
1
0
0
@25_cycle
Really_Bad_At_Names, Good at Science🦎
3 years
@sideen_dan Biomass isn't renewable? That's a surprise to biomass! Are you saying all life on earth is a one shot deal?
1
0
1
@sideen_dan
Dan Sideen
3 years
@25_cycle Assuming that the forests are replanted, wood pellets will eventually repay their carbon debt. But considering the energy used to harvest, transport,chop up, process & dry, it will be a long time. Time we may not have.
1
0
0
@IntermittentNRG
intermittent.energy
3 years
@sideen_dan They will be stuck with fossil fuels a long time because THE INTERMITTENCY
1
0
2
@hughjarse5
GK Schick
3 years
@sideen_dan Not only that but it has cost them a half a trillion to get there, and they have 2-3X the electricity costs we do in North America. The poor are really loving it I bet.
1
1
4
@lucaspvinicius
Lucas P
3 years
@sideen_dan The burning of #biomass emits more CO2 than the burning of #coal . There’s nothing #green about #biomass .
0
1
5
@seeteegee
Chris McGee
3 years
@sideen_dan Yikes, hopefully there's no plan to use whale oil either. I don't think I've ever seen Germany green on the map and I check regularly. "Doing it right" without nuclear seems to take a long time, produce much pollution and demonstrably limits people's lives.
0
0
7
@MikeMcL00531595
Mike McLean
3 years
@sideen_dan Haven’t heard of any reprieve for nuclear. Lost MWs may be supplied by coal if gas supply/cost doesn’t improve. Don’t know if nuclear can be ‘mothballed’ for saner minds or shut down is terminal.
1
0
2
@SuzLCampion
Suzanne Campion 🇪🇺🇫🇷🇩🇪🇮🇹🇺🇦🇦🇺
3 years
0
0
0
@SlagOffTwits
Fallor Ergo Sum
3 years
@sideen_dan Data doesn't matter to zealots. Reality is an obstacle not a guide.
0
0
3
@TonySheard6
Tony Sheard
3 years
@sideen_dan Dan. Yes. We need an honest discussion on nuclear. Without it to date our 1.5 degree GHG budget might already be broken
0
0
1
@MotherofTitan
Russell (replacement account for @heretical_1)
3 years
@sideen_dan yes. Because we still haven't solved the problem with radioactive waste, and we can always build more windmills.
0
0
0