7/ Core question: When compliance becomes the primary interface with digital assets, does decentralisation remain a feature — or a principle without implementation? #CryptoRegulation #LATAM #Stablecoins #BlockchainGovernance #FinancialInclusion #PaymentsInfrastructure

6/ LATAM is defining a potential global template: crypto integrated into mainstream finance with policy levers hard-coded — affecting digital identity, data governance, and financial sovereignty.

5/ This is not anti-innovation — but it restructures autonomy. Decentralisation remains the narrative while centralised monitoring becomes systemic reality.

4/ As regulation scales, fundamental operational norms shift: • Supervision replaces fragmentation • Traceability replaces pseudonymity • Compliance shapes market entry

3/ 🇧🇷 Brazil leads: • Licensing regimes enforced • CBDC pilot underway • Stablecoins = ~90% of domestic crypto flows Utility > hype.

2/ With ~57M users (≈12% of the population), regulators are now formalizing frameworks across 10 jurisdictions. The era of observation is over — governance is active.

Latin America has hit a decisive inflection point: crypto is shifting from speculative asset to core financial infrastructure for payments, remittances, and value preservation. 🧵

9/ The Federal Reserve’s DLT integration plan isn’t anti-crypto — it’s post-crypto. A future where blockchain runs inside the system it once sought to replace. #FederalReserve #CryptoRegulation #DLT #Stablecoins #Tokenisation #DigitalAssets #USPayments #FintechPolicy #Privacy

8/ The era of parallel finance is ending. Regulators are building the framework for institutional crypto, not sovereign crypto. Efficiency improves, but self-custody and privacy shrink. Decentralisation becomes a feature, not a right.

7/ What the Fed calls “access” could, in practice, mean conditional participation. Innovation becomes permissioned; privacy becomes compliant. The code still runs — but under supervision.

6/ For blockchain ethics, this is the defining question: Can decentralised networks survive once wired into state infrastructure? Or does every regulatory bridge become a point of capture?

5/ This move also mirrors a global trend. The G20’s Financial Stability Board, the EU’s MiCA framework, and Asia’s new licensing regimes are all pushing for traceability by design. Together, they’re redrawing the boundary between innovation and control.

4/ For policymakers, the logic is sound: – Stability – Risk visibility – Consumer protection But for users, it reopens the fundamental tension between privacy and oversight. Once assets flow through Fed-connected accounts, anonymity becomes theoretical.

3/ From a regulatory viewpoint, this marks a subtle power shift. The Fed is not trying to ban crypto — it’s trying to domesticate it. Decentralisation was designed to bypass the banking layer; now it’s being folded back into it under compliance logic.

2/ The Fed is studying a “payments account” model — a framework that could allow approved innovators to plug directly into central bank rails. It’s a milestone for blockchain adoption — but also a warning: integration brings supervision.

The Federal Reserve just confirmed what’s been unfolding quietly: crypto and blockchain are being absorbed into the U.S. payments system. Governor Waller's speech today signaled that distributed ledger technology, tokenized assets, and stablecoins are moving from the margins to

The G20’s Financial Stability Board warns of “significant gaps” in global crypto regulation — exposing a deeper tension between oversight, privacy, and decentralization. Can regulation safeguard innovation without undermining blockchain’s core ethos? Full analysis ↓

7/ The deeper story isn’t about gaps — it’s about who gets to define the architecture of financial sovereignty. Regulators see systemic risk. Builders see systemic redesign. Crypto remains the battleground between control and autonomy. #G20 #CryptoRegulation #BlockchainEthics

6/ The G20’s message is clear: the world wants one rulebook, but every jurisdiction writes in a different language. Without coordination, the push for “safe crypto markets” could deepen inequality between regulated and unregulated zones.

5/ This clash between privacy rights and regulatory transparency is defining the future of digital finance. Crypto’s foundational promise — self-sovereignty — now collides with compliance systems built for institutional control.