shake-leather
@shakeleather
Followers
3K
Following
39K
Media
3K
Statuses
12K
Autodidact, aspiring polymath | OSINT/HUMINT | DMs welcome | Per aspera ad astra | Foul-Mouthed | Good-faith Actor | 🛸 =👽? 🤷‍♂️ Signal@ Shakeleather1841.1843
Virginia, USA
Joined May 2022
Take notice #ufotwitter.
@Dustinw84180140 @Ryan18142158 @HighPeaks77 @LueElizondo We are winning, and we will win; we are never going to give up or let this go, our democracy depends on it. We have plans for every scenario, and we have backup plans for our backup plans.
4
6
57
The alternative to sound political advocacy is a community organized civil science initiative. The choice is yours but choose wisely or you’ll never know the truth.
0
0
3
Do not mistake this position as being anti-disclosure or anti-whistleblower. It’s quite the opposite. Stop the madness, stop the UAPDA. -Protect whistleblowers. -Disclose the truth.
@Pewpew841 What are PPD-19 whistleblowers legally reporting? They’re reporting an oversight issue, correct? So, what do they blow the whistle on once oversight has been corrected? When do the disclosures come?
1
0
4
An OSINT “estimate of the situation” attached. How does the UAPDA resolve these concealment mechanisms? How does it ensure transparency for supporters? See chart titled “How the UAPDA Could Fail to Rein in Executive Secrecy” in the prior tweet. (WBs only report for no oversight.)
0
1
2
The UAPDA may take 25 years to disclose, and only if the president and his appointees agree. Isn’t this tech going to be on the horizon within the next 5-10 years? That seems like an unfair advantage. How does the UAPDA address the concerns above? Has the nuance been explained?/>
1
0
2
Will it correct strategic communication policies, resolve over-classification, or result in actionable transparency about the nature of the phenomenon? Will it prevent private interests (eg Redwire, Palantir, Anduril) from having an unfair advantage? />
1
0
1
Is the UAPDA meant solely to correct oversight? Is there actionable legislation to protect whistleblowers reporting on the nature of UAP rather than oversight violations? What does it do to increase transparency or disclose the truth to supporters, in a timely manner? 1/4>
Once again, the UAPDA has not made it into the NDAA. After three failed attempts, it’s clear Congress needs a workable path forward. My proposed UAP Registration Act creates a proper foundational regulatory framework: registration, oversight, and accountability. Exactly what is
1
2
4
IG/ICIG when that new whistleblower drops: There is a lapse of appropriations and there will be limited updates.
0
2
5
I just unpaywalled it altogether, support me if you can, read me if you cant https://t.co/IkFWP4XjPE
I published a paper on exactly how the modern legacy program works. It's paywalled because it represents six months worth of research and editing (and I am broke) https://t.co/IkFWP4XjPE
#uapX #uaptwitter #Ufotwitter #ovni
7
48
151
*Ahem*
A theme from yesterday hearing that I wish to highlight: - The Executive branch was named numerous times as the arbiter of UAP matters… So why draft legislation that solidifies this subject under solely the Executive? Shouldn’t we be drafting legislation that explicitly
1
0
8
A theme from yesterday hearing that I wish to highlight: - The Executive branch was named numerous times as the arbiter of UAP matters… So why draft legislation that solidifies this subject under solely the Executive? Shouldn’t we be drafting legislation that explicitly
The UAP conversation needs a real path forward—not just speculation or seizures. I propose the UAP Registration Act, a framework to regulate NHI technologies transparently while respecting national security & IP rights. Read more in my latest article: https://t.co/c5g4fXHKE6
7
11
44
Update: Laslo has the flu. A few of us were worried when he went dark.
0
0
5
Watch things unravel as we pull this thread. Something isn’t right here. https://t.co/KnUAMj1m1n
1
0
2
None of this would occur if Congress passed a UAP Registration Act. If the materials exist they shall be registered. If not registered, witnesses will report to the FBI the existence of materials are unregistered and the civil / criminal enforcement mechanisms kick in. There are
The UAP conversation needs a real path forward—not just speculation or seizures. I propose the UAP Registration Act, a framework to regulate NHI technologies transparently while respecting national security & IP rights. Read more in my latest article: https://t.co/c5g4fXHKE6
11
12
51
@SnakePo9 “Now, how we communicate that with the public and the administration wants to communicate that, that's why I have experts who do strat-comm for us.” -Tim Phillips Strat-comm=Strategic Communications
@uapcaucus Ask them for clarification on their statement about strat-comm. Ask them if they coordinate with IPMO and PAO to restrict unclassified information from reaching the public using Information Operations. Ask them about the contractor that performs administrative duties for both
1
5
6
Here is where Registration Act will address the allegations made by Herrera below and the Disclosure Act will not. There is information now becoming public from various sources that the ICIG investigation was unable to gain access to legacy programs. Why? Because they are
9
35
114
Americans really will use ANYTHING but the metric system to measure.
4
0
11
@RepEricBurlison, I appreciate your openness to edits. I’ve drafted model legislative language, which can function as a standalone bill or be integrated into UAPDA. It addresses regulatory gaps with enforceable transparency. Happy to share. The following tweets will consist of an
VIDEO: "I'm open to making changes if people can identify how [UAPDA] can be improved," @RepEricBurlison exclusively tells Ask a Pol. “[@SenatorRounds] has done a lot of work on this, and I'm just trying to do my part in the House.” Full post coming: https://t.co/0QyKEUOcYn
1
8
26
For all Disclosure fighters: Out of every one-hundred men, ten shouldn’t even be there, eighty are just targets, nine are the real fighters, and we are lucky to have them, for they make the battle. Ah, but the one, one is a warrior and he will bring the others back. Heraclitus
6
10
61