Bad for user safety, probably even worse for user acquisition

@sebaudet26 what is the alternative?

@OurielOhayon Asking for a signature only when you need the user to take action

@sebaudet26 @zapper_fi is asking to connect wallet at site entry, that's similarly bad

@sasha0x1 @zapper_fi we are not, you can do anything on zapper that doesn't require a connection

@sebaudet26 tell them directly or tag here, it's the only way

@trent_vanepps @blur_io

@sebaudet26 I think they may change this after airdrop. Catch my drift?

@0x_Kun yeah that would make a lot of sense, they are probably botted like crazy

@sebaudet26 As soon as they have a cloud signer option that I release in the next 1-2 months that’s far superior to that

@sebaudet26 Yep. Let me peek around before showing you my wallet. Jeebus

@sebaudet26 @LNRDAO good to know 👀👀

@sebaudet26 Preach

@sebaudet26 saying it louder for the devs in the back 🗣️

@sebaudet26 evolutionarily when all the apps that make you connect or sign on page load go out of business

@sebaudet26 Any technical reason why they'd do it? Only thing that comes to mind is to cut down on web3 api access costs by not letting you use the app?

@sebaudet26 fucking BANGER

@sebaudet26 Amen. It's like web2 sites' pop-ups demanding email, etc. before you can even see the site, but much worse because now your whole personal bank is theirs to view (and maybe steal from)

@sebaudet26 💯. With what I'm building with ChainStory (think web3 resume/profile), we only ask the user to sign if they are taking an action to claim the page of their wallet address .

@sebaudet26 I think app builders get it, wallet builders need to deliver alternatives, which they are starting to do.