The author suggests using genetic congruence and international legal precedents to guide future reforms and effective implementation. To read the blog, visit the link in bio!

It contends that without more precise definitions and cooperative mechanisms, the Protocol fails to ensure fair benefit sharing among countries for genetic resources found across borders.

In this article, Tanya Sara George critiques the Nagoya Protocol’s vague guidance on transboundary genetic resources, focusing on the need for clearer, scientifically-based standards for sharing benefits.

utilization of genetic resources. While Articles 10 and 11 of the Protocol envision transboundary cooperation for shared genetic resources and traditional knowledge, these provisions remain underutilized and operationally ambiguous.

Equity Without Borders || Rolling Submissions The Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing was adopted in 2014 as a supplementary agreement to the Convention on Biological Diversity, establishing a framework for fair and equitable benefit sharing arising from the

We congratulate the winners and extend our appreciation to all participants for their exceptional contributions. We look forward to organizing more such intellectually enriching competitions in the future!

We further extend our appreciation to the authors whose submissions have been recognised as Honourable Mentions.

We are delighted to announce that after a rigorous and exhaustive evaluation process, the following articles have been adjudged the winning entries of the competition.

The Editorial Board of RSRR recently conducted the RSRR–Ahlawat & Associates Blog Series Competition on the theme 'Contemporary Frontiers in Intellectual Property Law'. We applaud all contributors for their insightful analysis and commendable academic engagement.

To read the blog, visit the link:

In this article, Anusha Agarwal, Associate Editor and Preeshaa Mishra, Assistant Editor at RSRR, examine how exceptions like per incuriam and sub silentio allow High Courts to depart from Supreme Court rulings and analyses comparative insights from the USA and South Africa.

However, this binding principle also raises challenges around judicial flexibility and the scope for courts to depart from precedent in certain exceptional circumstances.

Diverge and Conquer: Why Judicial Divergence is Healthy for the Indian Judicial Framework || Editor's Column The doctrine of stare decisis plays a crucial role in maintaining consistency, predictability, and stability within the Indian judicial system.

For more information, visit the link here:

We further encourage interdisciplinary perspectives that bridge theory and practice to reimagine the role of law in modern society. We invite abstracts for articles, case comments, legislative comments, and book reviews.

As the justice system adapts to new social and technological realities, we invite contributions that address structural reform, ethical standards, inclusivity, and innovation within the legal field.

This issue aims to capture scholarship that analyses law as both a profession and a principle, navigating its changing contours in practice, education, and governance.

At a time when law finds itself at the intersection of technology, reform, and accessibility, RSRR seeks to re-examine the evolving role of lawyers, courts, and institutions.

RSRR is delighted to invite abstract submissions for Volume 11 Issue 2 from students, academics, career researchers, legal practitioners, and judges, amongst others on the theme titled ‘Law in Practice and Principle: Reimagining the Legal Profession and the Justice System’.

Call for Abstracts || Volume 11 Issue 2