This is a tough decision. We are stopping the development of Despite onboarding ±1000 artists, we couldn’t establish a sustainable business model. Thank you to all artists and collectors for your faith and support, especially @ozbren_xyz, @Moxarra,

It's time to say goodbye with Hope by @XCOPY. We remain passionate collectors of Web3 art, our side project, @RightClickShare, has been moved to a new domain: If you're still using an profile link anywhere, we recommend removing

Scary AF.

Following our summer announcement about ending development, we’re considering selling the company with its brand assets: @rightclick (X and Telegram), ENS rightclick.eth, and an EU trademark. DMs are open.

RT @rightclick: Phygital artworks represent an exciting intersection of traditional and digital art forms, offering new ways to engage with….

Do you have phygitals in your collection?.

As the space continues to evolve, staying informed and adaptable will be key for artists, collectors, and sellers alike. The balance between the physical and digital sides in art is delicate but achievable.

On Artsy, the physical piece is listed with a price of $6,300, while the NFT exists as a separate entity. This dual representation underscores the complexities of managing and selling phygital artworks, emphasizing the importance of transparency and clear ownership records.

Our last example for today is "Matchbox" by @BHAREBOY. This mixed media on canvas comes with an NFT "that includes provenance, facsimile of the artist's signature, certificate of authenticity and a description of work".

3. Exclusivity: If exclusivity is promised, it must be adhered to strictly. Selling a physical artwork and its NFT as exclusive originals to different buyers without clear disclosure can damage an artist's reputation.

2. Agreements: Detailed contracts outlining the rights of the buyer for both the physical and digital pieces can prevent misunderstandings and disputes.

1. Transparency: Artists and sellers should be upfront about the nature of the artwork, clearly distinguishing between the physical and digital versions and their respective ownership rights.

To harness the full potential of phygital art, ethical sales practices must be established. Here are some key considerations:.

This approach solidifies the artwork's provenance through blockchain technology, ensuring a transparent and verifiable history of ownership, while also providing collectors with a new way of engagement and the joy of purchase and ownership.

@michaelkutsche 's "Melancholia Bay" is an excellent example. Each edition in this series comes with a @museframe display, a limited print tagged with @TransientLabs' T.R.A.C.E., and a signed certificate.

Phygital artworks have the potential to simplify transactions and enhance trust. They bridge the physical and digital art worlds, when done correctly and with respect to all parties involved.

By ensuring that both the physical and digital versions are connected, this approach maintains provenance and ownership transparency, minimizing ethical concerns around duplication.

An illustrative case is "Alphabet #1" by @P1AbyPIA. This phygital artwork, auctioned on MakersPlace, comes with a T.R.A.C.E. secure chip physically linked to the sculpture and a blockchain certificate of authenticity.

This duplication issue highlights the need for clear agreements and transparent communication between artists, buyers, and sellers to ensure that expectations are met and trust is maintained.

1. Exclusive Ownership: if a physical piece is sold, its NFT should either not exist or be transferred to the same buyer. 2. Shared Ownership: different versions cater to different markets and experiences, allowing them to be sold separately without ethical concerns.