These checks catch most real issues early. Refacto helps teams surface and prioritize these signals automatically, so reviews stay focused and fast. Try it for free! (8/8) https://t.co/9pfbyRbL75

Side effects: What else changes because of this? (7/8)

Retry logic: Are they handled gracefully without exhausting resources? (6/8)

Error handling: Does it provide enough context for debugging? (5/8)

Null or undefined handling: What happens at the edges? (4/8)

API changes: Could this break callers? (3/8)

Tests: Do they cover the change and still make sense? (2/8)

When reviewing a PR, some things deserve attention before everything else 👇🏻 (1/8)

Today's reminder: Explain the "why" in your PR description.

Fewer repetitive steps. More control where it matters. Set it up once. Let your repositories inherit the rest. Try Refacto for free! (5/5) https://t.co/9pfbyRbL75

The setup happens once at the org level. Adjustments happen only where they actually make sense. (4/5)

After that, teams can adjust the settings on a per-repo basis. Internal tools repo doesn’t need PR summaries? Turn them off. 📴 Customer-facing API repo can keep everything enabled. 🔛 Config repo doesn’t need sequence diagrams? Disable them. 📴 (3/5)

Refacto lets teams enable auto-reviews, PR summaries, and sequence diagrams once at the organization level. From that point on, every repository starts with those features already in place. (2/5)

Setting up the same review features repo after repo is busywork that adds zero value. (1/5)

Teams automated testing. They automated deployment. But most teams still review code like it's 2015.

The most expensive line of code is probably the one that works perfectly but nobody dares to change. 😅

Every iteration gets proper scrutiny. No review fatigue. No guessing if your fix introduced new issues. Your PR evolves, and so does the review. That's how it should work. Try it for free! (4/4) https://t.co/9pfbyRbL75

When the users commit new changes, they can invoke Refacto incremental review by dropping ‘/refacto-bot’ in the comment box. Refacto triggers another review, this time scoped to just that commit, and provides fresh feedback. (3/4)

Refacto solves this. It runs an auto-review on the PR, analyzes the code, and provides inline suggestions and comments. 👇🏻 (2/4)

First commit: detailed review. Second commit: "LGTM 👍" You've seen this pattern. You've probably done it too. (1/4)