Wow. I've only just seen the harassment
@Soc_of_Authors
is getting for the carefully worded announcement of the ADCI prize. Everyone equating self-ID with lying needs to have a big word with themselves. They're attacking a prize devised by disabled writers for disabled writers.
There’s criticism of the “self identify as disabled” line used here but, what’s the alternative do you think? A register for disabled? A benefits slip as proof? It isn’t to let non-disabled people fake it, it’s to enable disabled people who worry their disability “doesn’t count.”
They also need to educate themselves about living with disability (including the CI people replying diagnosis is fact & not self ID - bless you sweet summer children if you think that's how the world works). The whole point is the prize is not a PIP tribunal.
#DisLit
And lets face it, we all know why 99% of them have leapt on the words 'self-identify' and it sure as hell is not because they care about disability justice. 👀
@pollyrowena
@Soc_of_Authors
I wonder if this response is linked to transphobia and the way self-ID has been wrongfully discredited in that context. People don't realise how often we all have to self-ID in various situations
@penny_author
@Soc_of_Authors
I'm so sorry Penny - thinking of you & sending love & solidarity. You musn't let this dampen the great achievement of bringing this prize into being x
@pollyrowena
@Soc_of_Authors
I’ve just made the mistake of looking at the replies - upsetting and rage-inducing. Isn’t it even in the Equalities Act that proof is a non-equal burden?
@pollyrowena
@Soc_of_Authors
Imagine hating a 2-word expression so much that you'd attack the organizers of a book prize created by disabled people to give all those suffering from chronic illness or disability a chance to turn their experience into an opportunity...