but also clearly demonstrate why it matters to the supported organization in terms that are more universally understood and not otherwise drowning in technical jargon that has little value in executive forums. #crq @wef https://t.co/YIdZkcVvgv

Risk quantification is neither magical nor aspirational. When bound to well-established financial principles, it can provide data-driven and defensible metrics to actually rationalize not only investments

WEF/Accenture's cybersecurity outlook is a worthy read and their "intro" to the economics of cybersecurity certainly resonate with us and our customers.

Yet being able to articulate cyber risk in financial terms is essential for organizations to allocate resources effectively and build resilience."

"One of the critical barriers to adequate investment in cybersecurity is the inability to effectively quantify cyber risk due to the constantly evolving threat landscape as well as the complexity of estimating the potential impact of cyber incidents.

Join our CTO, Chris Puderbaugh, on Jonathan Green's "Cybersecurity in an AI World" podcast on Feb 3rd. More info here: https://t.co/dlbrnrlb53

Organizations face pressure to justify cybersecurity investments and demonstrate tangible risk reduction. CRQ has emerged as a critical methodology for transforming security from a cost center into a strategic business enabler. More from Pellonium's CEO: https://t.co/eoPphPBeAO

After all, threat actors aren’t tailoring their attacks to fit the visibility provided by a single technology.

While CNAPP, ASPM, and DSPM provide valuable insights, these domain-specific technologies will eventually need to be interconnected to offer a holistic view of security across the entire enterprise stack in relation to real-world threat scenarios.

However, from a security stack perspective, we still have many point solutions but lack an integrated fabric that ties them together to form a comprehensive enterprise security posture.

Over the past decade, we’ve seen several hype cycles, with the latest wave introducing new security technologies powered by AI.

Interesting list put together by CheckPoint, especially their insights on Cloud Security Platforms. Technology development generally follows cycles of expansion and convergence, and security is no exception. https://t.co/OUoAyuPbSm

Shifting this focus is crucial to staying relevant and effective in the ever-evolving cybersecurity landscape. #cyberrisk #pelloniumriskintelligence #compliance

CISOs and their teams must grasp the operational advantages of their work and align their execution accordingly. Many security programs prioritize regulatory compliance over addressing cyber risk, which is what truly impacts businesses.

It could help CISOs focus on what truly matters, aligning efforts with business needs without being excessively compliant. But where should the line be drawn?

This idea of splitting out the regulatory burden in security programs is intriguing. It mirrors trends seen in other highly regulated sectors like financial services. https://t.co/GdzTf0gOv7

These are the kinds of valuable, post-visibility questions security leaders can start asking once they have a firm understanding of their risk environment and how the enterprise stack performs within it.

However, there’s often bureaucratic friction (IT has their tools, and security has theirs), as well as ease-of-use challenges that push organizations toward investing in security technologies. But is this enough to justify the overlap we’re seeing? Probably not.

Long overdue, but it’s encouraging to see tool consolidation and prioritization gaining momentum. One of the advantages of starting a security career in IT is realizing that many security controls can be implemented within core infrastructure.

“60% of CISOs said their top priority for 2025 will be to consolidate and optimize existing tools for that arena” https://t.co/sAzSKUgbAa