The numbers paint a stark picture. After peaking at 69% in 2004, the homeownership rate fell every year until 2016, when it was 64.3%. The rate rebounded in Trump’s presidency, hitting 66% in 2020, but that trend may be short-lived (📊 via @stlouisfed )

This process is painful, but it’s not all bad. Slowly but surely, most Americans’ single biggest asset — their home — is becoming more liquid. Call it the liquefaction of the U.S. housing market

Single-family homes have historically been an extremely illiquid asset: 🏡 Appraisals have to be made on an individual basis 🏡 Mispriced homes sit on the market for months waiting for a potential buyer — only for that buyer’s financing to fall through

Liquid assets, like publicly traded stocks, earn a liquidity premium. The more liquid an asset, the higher that premium goes. On the flip side, stocks can see their prices collapse when investors get spooked and withdraw their cash from the market

Houses have typically traded with very little liquidity premium. That meant a relatively low purchase price compared to what it would cost to rent — the equivalent of the dividend from housing investment — and stable prices over time

These two factors made houses a good investment for moderate-income families who often lacked the cash and the risk tolerance for market investments. As investments went, single-family homes were cheap and slowly grew in value in both good times and bad

In the early 21st century, automated appraisals and mortgage underwriting began to change that. Combined with the repackaging of subprime loans into CDOs, they created a far more liquid market for housing. Housing prices soared — and became more sensitive

When investors pulled out of CDOs, buyer financing dried up and the whole housing market crashed. It may have seemed at the time like a failed experiment. But financialization had changed the housing market forever

Houses are now more prone to be priced high relative to rents, and to see their prices fluctuate with the market. The very features that made home buying an affordable and stable investment are coming to an end

But the illiquidity that made houses a safe investment also made America less dynamic. Homeowners in coastal areas are reluctant to agree to change. The result is less development and sky-high rents for any residents not lucky enough to own their own home

As more institutional investors enter the housing market, the incentives begin to shift. Large investors can expand or redevelop their properties themselves, because they benefit from a greater number of overall tenants, even if rents themselves dip

A nation of renters could lead to a world where decisions are driven by personal preferences and life-cycle demands: 🌆Young workers might prefer the excitement of a city 🏠A couple starting a family could reunite with their parents in a small town

The U.S. is not quite there yet, and not just because too many people are chasing too few apartments. To see the U.S. as a nation of renters requires a revision of the American dream of homeownership

@bopinion dumb

@bopinion It is in fact something to fear: a nation of serfs and lords. Sounds pretty dystopian.

@bopinion It’s pretty sinister to think that Americans shouldn’t be worried about owning their own home over renting from their “Land LORD.” @Timcast

@bopinion Wow, what a propaganda piece. Attract me with the complaint about American home ownership becoming out of reach only to try and sell me on a future of mass slavery

@bopinion This is the most striking peice demonstrating the very real "Bloomberg Corporate Elitist Mentality" to the point where it almost offends me. I can't even being to discribe how narrow minded this is. "Let's treat houses that people live in as some Wall Street financial gimmick."

@bopinion Let them eat cake!

@bopinion @threadreaderapp compile