@occultiscool
logical magician
2 years
@echetus She sounds like a 3rd grader giving a presentation lmao
2
0
261

Replies

@echetus
Stakeholder Consultant
2 years
Also enjoying Wikimedia's largesse was Borealis Philanthropy. Borealis is yet another grant giving organisation: They're even more political, and fully committed to driving America's cultural revolution.
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
14
186
3K
@echetus
Stakeholder Consultant
2 years
Wikimedia gave $250,000 to Borealis's Racial Equity in Journalism Fund. That money was then cascaded down to a dozens of ideologically aligned news outlets across the US.
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
4
158
3K
@echetus
Stakeholder Consultant
2 years
Thus, the money you give to keep Wikipedia online is diverted to bankroll the inescapable American culture war.
15
514
5K
@echetus
Stakeholder Consultant
2 years
Back in 2017, a Wikipedian called Guy Macon wrote a strident article entitled "Wikipedia has a Cancer". He predicted Wikimedia's runaway spending would bankrupt Wikipedia, resulting in its takeover by Facebook or Google. Since then, Wikimedia's budget has almost doubled.
Tweet media one
4
222
4K
@echetus
Stakeholder Consultant
2 years
What Macon misunderstood is that orgs like Wikimedia are not cancers. They are parasites that cannot survive outside their host. Almost nobody would donate to Wikimedia so it could spend money on these causes - without Wikipedia, Wikimedia would starve.
4
214
4K
@echetus
Stakeholder Consultant
2 years
In the west, an advanced industry of NGOs, charities, and foundations has evolved which funds so much of the weirdness in our daily lives. A caste of activist-professionals have emerged, which inevitably capture any non-profit with spare cash.
10
446
4K
@echetus
Stakeholder Consultant
2 years
This is what is sometimes called The Blob: a powerful but inconspicuous force that has given us the dysfunction of the 21st century.
13
131
3K
@echetus
Stakeholder Consultant
2 years
Wikipedia is an amazing and important website. But it doesn't need your money. It has enough to stay online, improve and grown. What it needs more donations for is to fund one side in the United States' culture war.
45
470
5K
@echetus
Stakeholder Consultant
2 years
A sad footnote to this: In 2021 SeRCH ran their own funding programme, "Hot Science Summer". In deciding who to fund, the key criteria was use of the Intersectional Scientific method. Everything else - a scientific background, data - was optional. What could possibly go wrong?
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
5
106
2K
@echetus
Stakeholder Consultant
2 years
One of the projects was into spatial learning in the California Two-Spot Octopus, for which the researcher got 12 hatchling octopuses. Unfortunately, the lab experiment went horribly wrong, killing the poor creatures before the research could be concluded.
84
156
2K
@BSIC_XX
Buddah Stalin ⚰️
2 years
@occultiscool @echetus Oh thank god someone else said it first 💀
0
0
13