marclbusch Profile Banner
Marc L. Busch Profile
Marc L. Busch

@marclbusch

Followers
2K
Following
119
Media
375
Statuses
1K

Karl F. Landegger Professor of Intl. Business Diplomacy @Georgetown. Regulator contributor @TheHill.

Washington, DC
Joined June 2018
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@marclbusch
Marc L. Busch
1 day
My thanks to @GeorgetownLaw Appellate Litigation Clinic for helping me bring this amicus brief to fruition. It argues that Section 122, not IEEPA, is the right statute if Trump wants to use of tariffs to address"persistent" US goods trade deficits https://t.co/Gstc0SvVvE
0
0
0
@marclbusch
Marc L. Busch
2 days
In @TheHillOpinion, Erica Hashimoto (@GeorgetownLaw) and I argue that even if IEEPA permits tariffs (it doesn't), Section 122 prevails as the specific statute targeting specific problem with specific limits. That’s black-letter law https://t.co/aLh2ZRciG4
Tweet card summary image
thehill.com
If the Trump administration wants to use tariffs to fight “persistent” goods trade imbalances, the right statute is Section 122 of the Trade Act, not the International Emergency Economic …
0
2
3
@marclbusch
Marc L. Busch
5 days
Talking tariffs in @Georgetown's storied Gaston Hall for Parents Weekend. What a thrill
0
0
1
@marclbusch
Marc L. Busch
15 days
Speaking with @POLITICOEurope about China's latest move on rare earths. It's not all stick. There's a possible carrot: "multilateral and bilateral export control dialogue mechanisms." https://t.co/lW8fn1HLrg
Tweet card summary image
politico.com
Beijing’s rare earth crackdown lays bare the fusion of economic rivalry and national security risk.
0
0
0
@marclbusch
Marc L. Busch
16 days
My column in @TheHillOpinion, this week on the guardrail that isn't: Congress's vote on the "national emergency" underlying Trump's IEEPA tariffs https://t.co/bz9r2OW3Z6
Tweet card summary image
thehill.com
Congress’s inability and unwillingness to do its job does not expand presidential power.  
0
0
0
@marclbusch
Marc L. Busch
1 month
My column in @TheHillOpinion on why US shouldn't pursue trade deal with India unless Delhi gets serious about protecting IP https://t.co/fCLp62ETSs
Tweet card summary image
thehill.com
The message should be simple: No IP, no partnership. 
3
0
1
@marclbusch
Marc L. Busch
1 month
Court of Appeals ruling on IEEPA tariffs drew a dissent. Trump admin sees it as "roadmap" for prevailing at the Supreme Court. In my @TheHillOpinion I argue this is wrong. The dissent is a dead end. https://t.co/tcd4liQ6F3
Tweet card summary image
thehill.com
Navarro’s “roadmap” is a dead end. 
2
1
3
@marclbusch
Marc L. Busch
2 months
In this @TheHillOpinion piece, @J_A_Hillman and I write that Court of Appeals for Federal Circuit and eventually Supreme Court will review Trump's IEEPA tariffs through different legal lenses, but both are likely to rule against them https://t.co/50hWyCGSbd
Tweet card summary image
thehill.com
The Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court look at a case like this through different lenses. 
0
2
6
@marclbusch
Marc L. Busch
2 months
Before Court of Appeals, DOJ argued Trump used IEEPA largely because Section 122 is about balance of payments, not trade deficit. In this @CFR_org piece, Dan Trefler and I argue this makes no sense: 90% of balance of payments IS the trade deficit https://t.co/80Sw6slcVm
Tweet card summary image
cfr.org
Marc L. Busch is the Karl F. Landegger professor of international business diplomacy at the Walsh School of Foreign Service, Georgetown University. Daniel Trefler is the Douglas and Ruth Grant Canada...
1
2
3
@marclbusch
Marc L. Busch
2 months
If you'd like to see the fruits of a young and talented movie maker, check out "Acid Noir" by my son, @RealZachBusch https://t.co/HhVPXTMtuH
0
0
2
@marclbusch
Marc L. Busch
2 months
What a thrill to be a guest on the @QuinnTaber show to talk about Trump's tariffs, international trade and even cosmopolitinism https://t.co/ArafkbMp9F
0
0
1
@marclbusch
Marc L. Busch
2 months
US-EU trade "framework" expands previous lobster deal. Seafood caucus in Congress flexing its muscle under threat of 13 tariff lines on EU's final retaliation list.
0
0
0