5. Twitto quando ho tempo. Potrebbe quindi volerci molto tempo per rispondere alla tua critica. Abbi pazienza. Oppure, rileggi il tuo tweet e controlla se ricade nei casi al punto 2. 10/10.

o DM me. Altrimenti, verrai ignorato anche se la critica è fondata. 4. le minacce alla mia salute (sì, le ho ricevute), gli insulti, le accuse e tutto il resto non mi spaventano. Parlano del livello dell’interlocutore. Non ti bloccherò, semplicemente ti ignorerò. 9/.

Cancella i tuoi tweet offensivi, riafferma la critica in modo garbato e cercherò di rispondere. 3. Amo la responsabilità. Accetto le conseguenze di quello che dico. Se sei un account anonimo, pseudonimo e vuoi avviare una discussione con me, firma il tuo tweet con il tuo nome 8/.

2. le critiche vanno bene; tuttavia, non tollero insulti, aggressività, accuse di essere guidato da un'agenda politica. Gli account che si impegnano in queste pratiche verranno ignorati anche se trovo che la critica sia fondata. 7/.

ITA. Con mia sorpresa, le persone hanno interagito molto con un mio thread. Apprezzo il dibattito ma vorrei stabilire alcune regole: 1. questo è il mio account personale, diverso da @LabScorrano dove discutiamo di mitocondriologia. Non confondeteli per favore 6/.

5. I tweet when I have time. It might take a long time to answer to your critique. Be patient, or check if your tweet falls into the #2 category. 5/.

4. health threats (yes, I received them), insults, accusations, and all the others do not scare me. They speak about the level of the discussant. I won’t block you, but simply ignore you. 4/.

and I will try to address it. 3. I love accountability. If I say something, I accept consequences. If you are an anonymous account and you want to discuss with me, sign your tweet with your name, or DM me. Otherwise, you will be ignored even it the critique is grounded. 3/.

2. critiques are OK; however, I will not tolerate insults, aggressivity, implications that I am driven by a political agenda. Accounts engaging in these practices will be ignored even if I find the critique grounded. Cancel your insulting tweets, restate the critique fairly 2/.

EN, ITA follows. To my surprise, people interacted a lot with one of my threads. I appreciate debate but I would like to set some basic rules: 1. this is my personal account, different from my lab's @LabScorrano where we discuss mito science. Please don't confuse them. 1/.

communication, so they are not an "individual choice". This is even more true for school children who have no choice. @fcecconi64 @SaraGandini3 @antonellaviol17 @https://academic.oup.com/jid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/infdis/jiac195/6582941#.Yn0Rbs2UYhE.twitter.

lending support to this practice, I beg you to return to science: unmask Italy. Issue a firm statement that masks are like homeopathy: no efficacy in real life, irrespective how much you believe in it. At a difference from homeopathy, they interfere with interpersonal 5/6

might instead have long term mental health consequences not taken into account. Doing so without any risk-benefit assesment, as done in Italy, and against <12yo ECDC recommendations, is medically and scientifically wrong. As a colleague of media prominent Italian professors 4/5.

because they are a treatment with no benefit. Forcing population to wear them has no effect, except propagation of a mental status of alarm. Forcing schoolers to wear them 8 h/day like in Italy, the only country in EU to do so until the end of the school year 3/.

Beneath the mask, some difference for fit-tested N95, albeit non significant. Graphs are illuminating. This result is in line with all prior knowledge: N95 must be fit-tested for some protection, and surgical masks provide 0 protection. Using them in community is wrong, 2/.

A recent study measured the efficacy of masks (surgical, N95-FFP2 and fit tested N95) in reducing load of a model virus aerosolized in a room. The results are pretty clear: inside nostrils no difference whatsoever between wearing no mask or any type masks, even fit tested N95 1/.

I had immediatly written to my Rector @UniPadova requesting that this nonsense is amended. I doubt that they will do so, but I wish to be remembered as someone who stood for scientific evidence in dark times of superstition. A scientist, in one word.

completed the picture. Italy decided to sacrifice easily their young ones, to school unions and elderly or hypocondriac politicians. To complete this, even my University, where masks are no longer required, had the guts to prolong the requirement only in the classrooms!

by the mith of illiberal regimes they love all the support they shall never have given. A system that does not reward individual merit in Academia, but proximity to politics, that fuels public money to mediocre and in permanent COI editors who underpaid journalists 5/.

Because I dedicated my professional life to discovering new treatments for patients and I know how hard it is to go from discovery to proof of principle, to therapy, I feel violated as a scientist. Mediocre and politicized advisors offered politicians molded 4/.