kevintpayne Profile Banner
Kevin Payne Profile
Kevin Payne

@kevintpayne

Followers
25K
Following
19K
Media
3K
Statuses
24K

AI & GTM Engineer | RevOps | Building AI-Powered GTM Systems

👋🏾 View Newsletter ➜
Joined April 2009
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@kevintpayne
Kevin Payne
12 hours
Most GTM engineers are building revenue stacks that will break at scale. Here's the framework I use to evaluate AI-powered systems before they become "systems hell"
Tweet media one
1
0
1
@kevintpayne
Kevin Payne
12 hours
The goal isn't perfection. It's flexibility → the ability to respond when leadership asks for new capabilities. Use FRIC to audit your current stack:. → Score each dimension 1-5.→ Identify your biggest red flags.→ Fix the highest-impact issues first.
0
0
1
@kevintpayne
Kevin Payne
12 hours
COUPLING: How tightly connected are your tools?. The worst mistake: HubSpot ↔ Salesforce bidirectional sync. When one system changes, it impacts everything else. Like dominoes falling. Better: Data flows one direction → warehouse → back to tools via reverse ETL.
1
0
1
@kevintpayne
Kevin Payne
12 hours
INTEROPERABILITY: How well do your tools actually connect?. Don't just look at the integrations page. Ask:. → What data format comes out?.→ Does it fit our specific needs?.→ Can we see a working demo?. Many "integrations" are just marketing tiles.
1
0
1
@kevintpayne
Kevin Payne
12 hours
REDUNDANCY: Do you have backup ways to accomplish critical tasks?. ❌ Bad: One integration breaks → entire workflow stops. ❌ Also bad: 5 tools doing the exact same thing with no strategy. ✅ Good: Strategic backup systems with clear primary/secondary paths.
1
0
1
@kevintpayne
Kevin Payne
12 hours
FOCUS: How well do specific tools do specific jobs?. ❌ Bad: 7 different places to create audiences (Segment, HubSpot, Salesforce, warehouse, Clearbit, etc.). ✅ Good: One clear path for audience creation with documented workflows.Confusion kills velocity.
1
0
1
@kevintpayne
Kevin Payne
12 hours
The FRIC Framework evaluates every revenue stack on 4 dimensions:. F - Focus.R - Redundancy.I - Interoperability.C - Coupling. Think of this as your stack's "health score.". Green = good. Red = systems hell waiting to happen.
1
0
1
@kevintpayne
Kevin Payne
12 hours
After a decade building RevOps for startups and managing $250K+ ad budgets, I've seen the same mistakes repeatedly:. → Tools connected in every direction.→ Data moving back and forth between systems.→ No one can debug when something breaks. There's a better way.
1
0
1
@kevintpayne
Kevin Payne
3 days
Perfectionism kills more startups than competition ever will. Most founders build features nobody wants. The 48-Hour MVP Formula: . → Hours 1-8: Problem validation .→ Hours 9-16: Identify core feature.→ Hours 17-48: Build and launch . Validate demand fast, improve later.
0
0
1
@kevintpayne
Kevin Payne
3 days
Your first startup will probably fail. So will your second. That's why you should build a portfolio:. → Multiple small bets.→ AI-powered automation.→ Fractional staff.→ Content systems. Build a portfolio of digital real estate. Not a single mansion.
0
0
2
@kevintpayne
Kevin Payne
3 days
System 5: Value-Based Monetization. Pricing errors:. ❌ Undercharging due to lack of confidence.❌ Using manipulative tactics to maximize extraction.The solution: Price at 10% of the value you create. If you save users 5 hours weekly at $50/hour value = $1,000 monthly value.
0
0
0
@kevintpayne
Kevin Payne
3 days
System 4: User Journey Optimization. The math that matters:. → 10K monthly visits.→ 1,500 start trials (15% conversion).→ 300 become active (20% conversion).→ 150 become paying customers (50% conversion). At $19/month = $2,850 MRR. Small improvements create exponential growth.
1
0
1
@kevintpayne
Kevin Payne
3 days
System 3: The 48-Hour MVP Formula. Perfectionism kills more businesses than competition ever will. The breakdown:. → Hours 1-8: Problem validation through conversations.→ Hours 9-16: Identify core feature (ONE problem).→ Hours 17-48: Build and launch.
1
0
1
@kevintpayne
Kevin Payne
3 days
System 2: Community-First Growth Engine. Here's what 99% of founders get backwards: They build first, then pray someone cares. Systematic founders flip the script:. ✓ Build audience first.✓ Validate demand second.✓ Create solution third.
1
0
1
@kevintpayne
Kevin Payne
3 days
→ Quadrant 1 (Sweet Spot): Your goldmine.→ Quadrant 2 (Learning Zone): Skill opportunity.→ Quadrant 3 (Passion Project): Hobby.→ Quadrant 4 (Avoid Zone): Waste.
1
0
1
@kevintpayne
Kevin Payne
3 days
After my corporate layoff, I discovered something powerful:. The most profitable business you can build solves problems you've already conquered in your own life. System 1: The Authentic Opportunity Matrix. Map your expertise systematically:.
2
0
1
@kevintpayne
Kevin Payne
3 days
While everyone's pitching VCs, smart founders are building micro SaaS businesses with 80-90% profit margins. Here's the 6-system framework that's changing everything:
Tweet media one
1
1
3
@kevintpayne
Kevin Payne
5 days
Biblical principle that changed my approach:. "A man's heart plans his way, but the Lord directs his steps." - Proverbs 16:9. I plan the content. God directs the connections. When you focus on serving others, the right people find you.
0
0
1
@kevintpayne
Kevin Payne
5 days
The 2-hour/week secret:. I don't create more content. I create better systems. One piece of content becomes:. → 1 Substack Newsletter.→ 1 Medium Article.→ 1 Long Form Post.→ 3 Short Form Posts.→ Endless Reddit & Quora answers. Systems multiply your impact.
1
0
1
@kevintpayne
Kevin Payne
5 days
My Creator OS framework works because it prioritizes depth over width:. Posts lead to followers.Threads lead to email subscribers.Newsletters lead to customers.Systems lead to freedom. Each piece moves people up the trust ladder.
1
0
1