
Jordana Cepelewicz
@jordanacep
Followers
2K
Following
38
Media
3
Statuses
74
science and math journalist @quantamagazine
New York, NY
Joined August 2015
Long after the Mandelbrot set went out of vogue, four mathematicians remained devoted to understanding it. It was a privilege to report their story -- a story about exploration and the power of technology to shape the most abstract realms of human thought.
11
65
223
The mathematics of 20th-century prodigy Ramanujan was mysterious, otherworldly. I wrote about his life and work for @QuantaMagazine, and about the mathematicians who have continued to find new meaning in his formulas more than 100 years after his death:
quantamagazine.org
Born poor in colonial India and dead at 32, Ramanujan had fantastical, out-of-nowhere visions that continue to shape the field today.
3
14
26
RT @nattyover: We’ve spent months putting together an immersive special issue of Quanta Magazine that explores the ultimate scientific ques….
quantamagazine.org
This special issue of Quanta Magazine explores the ultimate scientific quest: the search for the fundamental nature of reality.
0
81
0
RT @QuantaMagazine: The Riemann hypothesis is the most important unsolved problem in math. But mathematicians have no idea how to prove it.….
0
65
0
RT @QuantaMagazine: American swimmers keep setting new records on their way to the Paris Olympics, in part because they’re using math to an….
0
89
0
RT @QuantaMagazine: Three and a half years ago, artificial intelligence transformed the study of proteins. Prominent scientists in the fiel….
quantamagazine.org
Three years ago, Google’s AlphaFold pulled off the biggest artificial intelligence breakthrough in science to date, accelerating molecular research and kindling deep questions about why we do science.
0
29
0
RT @QuantaMagazine: 150 years ago, the formal definition of irrational numbers marked what was arguably the beginning of modern mathematics….
quantamagazine.org
Useful mathematical concepts, like the number line, can linger for millennia before they are rigorously defined.
0
48
0
As with any creative endeavor, the world of mathematics can be a lonely one -- full of disappointment, rejection and uncertainty. I spoke with mathematician Danny Calegari about these experiences, and why they're important. My latest for @QuantaMagazine:
quantamagazine.org
The topologist Danny Calegari discusses the inevitability of disappointment in math, and how to learn from it.
1
9
28
RT @QuantaMagazine: After spending two years trying to prove a longstanding conjecture about how curvature defines shape, three researchers….
quantamagazine.org
Mathematicians have disproved a major conjecture about the relationship between curvature and shape.
0
32
0
RT @QuantaMagazine: Mathematicians have the tools to explore worlds of 2, 3 and 5+ dimensions. But the fourth dimension remains mysterious….
0
104
0
RT @QuantaMagazine: Michel Talagrand has been awarded the Abel Prize, one of the highest honors in mathematics, for applying tools from hig….
0
368
0
Many mathematicians seem to have this poetic sensibility. Reminds me a little of June Huh, who I profiled in 2022:
quantamagazine.org
June Huh wasn’t interested in mathematics until a chance encounter during his sixth year of college. Now his profound insights connecting combinatorics and geometry have led to math’s highest honor.
1
1
8
I really enjoyed speaking with Claire Voisin about the artistic and poetic nature of mathematics. In her words: "You could compare a mathematical theorem to a poem." My latest for @QuantaMagazine:
quantamagazine.org
The recipient of the 2024 Crafoord Prize in Mathematics discusses math as art, math as language, and math as abstract thought.
1
11
59
While working on that story, I encountered other incredible phenomena that can emerge in even simpler settings, including a mysterious object called an ENTROPY BAGEL. (Yes, think "Everything Everywhere All at Once.") Learn more about it here:
quantamagazine.org
Simple rules in simple settings continue to puzzle mathematicians, even as they devise intricate tools to analyze them.
2
2
15
Last month, I wrote for @QuantaMagazine about the incredible complexity that arises from very simple rules -- and the mathematicians who have dedicated themselves to untangling that complexity:
quantamagazine.org
For decades, a small group of mathematicians has patiently unraveled the mystery of what was once math’s most popular picture. Their story shows how technology transforms even the most abstract...
2
28
124
RT @QuantaMagazine: We’re used to one idea of a computer, but machines that perform computations can exist in a wide variety of practical o….
quantamagazine.org
Two mathematicians have shown that origami can, in principle, be used to perform any possible computation.
0
74
0
Modular forms are some of math's most beautiful and mysterious functions. When graphed, they're mesmerizing: an infinite cascade of flower petals, depicted in all the colors of the rainbow. But what exactly are they? I attempt to explain:
quantamagazine.org
Modular forms are one of the most beautiful and mysterious objects in mathematics. What are they?
0
32
102
It turns out this question is surprisingly deep. (A common theme in math!) It's relevant to our understanding of the Fourier transform, solutions to the wave equation, and open problems in number theory. My latest for @QuantaMagazine:
quantamagazine.org
On its surface, the Kakeya conjecture is a simple statement about rotating needles. But it underlies a wealth of mathematics.
0
0
6
Earlier this year, I wrote about work on a (deceptively) simple-sounding geometry problem: If you rotate a needle so that it points in every direction, what's the smallest area you can cover?
quantamagazine.org
A new proof marks major progress toward solving the Kakeya conjecture, a deceptively simple question that underpins a tower of conjectures.
1
0
6
RT @QuantaMagazine: What is a mathematical proof? What we tend to think of as an eternal, immutable truth, is perhaps better understood as….
quantamagazine.org
Number theorist Andrew Granville on what mathematics really is — and why objectivity is never quite within reach.
0
120
0