Joe Stujenske Profile
Joe Stujenske

@jmstujenske

Followers
272
Following
227
Media
0
Statuses
132

Assistant Professor in Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh || MD, PhD systems neuroscientist and psychiatrist || https://t.co/3LVtcF48T3

New York, NY
Joined July 2015
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@jmstujenske
Joe Stujenske
2 years
📢 Recruiting as a new PI at the University of Pittsburgh! 🧠🔬. 🔍 Do you ever wonder how the brain regulates emotions? What circuits are involved and how do they integrate information from within and without? Join me in studying this and more.🌟.
5
52
113
@jmstujenske
Joe Stujenske
6 months
RT @AnneEGeller: Funding from the @NIH contributed to the development of 354 out of 356 (99.4%) of the new drugs approved by the FDA betwee….
0
403
0
@grok
Grok
7 days
What do you want to know?.
613
395
3K
@jmstujenske
Joe Stujenske
6 months
RT @brainaddiction: It's clear that many do not understand what @NIH-funded research does to improve health. It's time to revive a study pu….
0
424
0
@jmstujenske
Joe Stujenske
6 months
If we decrease SSRI and other antidepressant prescribing, people will lose jobs, relationships, and their lives. This isn't political; this is life and death stuff. Fin 8/8.
0
0
0
@jmstujenske
Joe Stujenske
6 months
SSRIs don't give highs like heroin and other addictive drugs, so to call them addictive is beyond misleading. And people aren't weak for staying on them. They are successful parents, leaders, teachers, who other people rely on, and I commend them for getting treatment. 7/8.
1
0
1
@jmstujenske
Joe Stujenske
6 months
It is true that there should be more emphasis on trying to slowly stop SSRIs after sustained remission, but many people do try to stop and spiral back and therefore stay on permanently. I'm not sure why we are okay with this for blood pressure but not depression. 6/8.
1
0
1
@jmstujenske
Joe Stujenske
6 months
SSRI discontinuation syndrome is obviously a thing, but in practice, it just isn't that hard to stop SSRIs for the vast majority of people. Most won't have any discontinuation with a slow taper; the rest we use Prozac (long acting) for a slower taper. 5/8.
1
0
0
@jmstujenske
Joe Stujenske
6 months
Death of family membets, lost jobs, etc. It is hard for a drug to combat all of that. Many people have challenging social situations. When the factors SSRIs can't treat aren't in the picture, SSRIs are SUPER effective for depression. *Life changing* meds. 4/8.
1
0
0
@jmstujenske
Joe Stujenske
6 months
So why do clinical trials show such weak effects? First, the data is super noisy. Meta-analyses show on average SSRIs more effective than placebo within a week but small studies can't find this. Ppl who enroll in clinical trials, like everyone, have complex lives. 3/8.
1
0
0
@jmstujenske
Joe Stujenske
6 months
Do SSRIs work because people with depression (or OCD, anxiety, etc) have low serotonin? NO. This doesn't "debunk" them. They boost BDNF, which promotes neuroplasticity. Probably why they don't work instantaneously. Food for thought: MOA for tylenol still unknown. 2/8.
1
0
0
@jmstujenske
Joe Stujenske
6 months
SSRIs are miracle drugs. Trials make them seem marginally effective, but patients have many psychosocial factors working against their recovery (yet SSRIs still help!) In practice, they are remarkably effective and safe. Briefđź§µ 1/8.
1
0
1
@jmstujenske
Joe Stujenske
6 months
RT @dr_alexharris: Physicians who go into research have to be dreamers. Only 1.5% of doctors work as scientists & they earn about 60% what….
Tweet card summary image
medscape.com
A lack of funding, mentorship, and compensation for clinician-researchers could threaten America's standing as the world leader in biomedicine.
0
2
0
@jmstujenske
Joe Stujenske
6 months
RT @jgschraiber: My time in industry convinced me of the importance of basic, government funded science research. It was crazy how much of….
0
132
0
@jmstujenske
Joe Stujenske
7 months
RT @bita137: Many in biotech/private sector are boasting about their ways of funding and doing science . But they are staffed with PhDs and….
0
96
0
@jmstujenske
Joe Stujenske
7 months
The NIH indirect cut does not cause money redistribution, it just cuts money onto existing grants. If there was a redistribution of money that could almost be reasonable. That's NOT what is happening.
0
0
0
@jmstujenske
Joe Stujenske
7 months
Research like this will not continue at this same pace if the attack on NIH funding continues.
@DrSamuelBHume
Samuel Hume
7 months
Top 5 advances in medicine this week (🧵). 1. A vaccine to prevent recurrence of kidney cancer. This is a small trial – 9 patients – all of whom had stage 3 or 4 renal cell carcinoma removed by surgery (removal of the primary tumour, any positive lymph nodes, and any visible
Tweet media one
0
0
0
@jmstujenske
Joe Stujenske
7 months
Indirects don't only cover "administrative costs" and they aren't a "slush fund." We can't use directs to pay for ANY shared resources/people. Research buildings where we work cost lots of money to build and maintain. Universities employ many people, and most are not Harvard. .
0
0
3
@jmstujenske
Joe Stujenske
7 months
Lots of misinformation about indirects. Indirects pay our rent, ulitilies (e.g. electric), maintenance costs for our space (janitors, painters, plumbers), IT infrastructure, the admins who do many hours of work to help us apply for grants,. we can't request direct $ for these!.
0
0
3
@jmstujenske
Joe Stujenske
11 months
Opening for a postdoc in my neuroscience lab at Pitt using cutting edge population imaging and electrophysiology techniques to map circuits regulating internal states and their manifestations. My contact is on lab website:
1
8
15
@jmstujenske
Joe Stujenske
11 months
RT @ELikhtik: New work out with Nesha Burghardt's group. During chronic social defeat stress, mice are fear conditioned to avoid the social….
0
8
0