Tannr 🦾🤖
@intent_dev
Followers
2K
Following
1K
Media
90
Statuses
4K
Founder & CTO @khalani_network | dad | philosophy MA-PhD - mind & consciousness | powered by heavy weights & brain peptides | not-a-physicalist
In a DB
Joined April 2018
Verification-Centric Chains, Common Knowledge Machines, and Intents Verification-centric blockchains outsource the computation/generation of transactions to off-chain agents ("solvers"). But a verification-centric chain is only as good as its verifier (the VM). You can judge a
2
10
54
This is definitely satire. Either this, or there is a growing subset of the population who have somehow come to believe that even the deepest of relationships held together by genuine personal intimacy is nothing more than an economic exchange. This view can only be held by a
Managing his stress. Interpreting his moods. Holding his hand through feelings he won’t share with anyone else. All of it unpaid, unacknowledged, and often unreciprocated. Is it any wonder women are fed up?
0
0
3
Such a good debate. After David speaks: wow that was pretty compelling. Not sure how Brian will be able respond to that After Brian speaks: okay that was a pretty compelling response. Not sure how David will be able to respond to that Whiplash of the best kind
Here @davidpapineau and Brian Cutter debate physicalism, dualism, and much more besides. Buckle up for some juicy philosophy🔥 https://t.co/dX5HAXD1Sb
1
0
1
18
118
2K
A short and sweet reply to @Benthamsbulldog 's critique of Continental Philosophy. It took thirty minutes to write. Look how easy it is to nicely disagree with someone. https://t.co/LIMFSy7aX6
0
0
4
extreme pressure and urgency feels great. no pressure and total freedom feels great. everything in between kinda sucks
10
22
279
Greatest*. He single handedly incited all sides of an obsolete debate to passionately re-engage. People who allegedly met him in person in an academic context shit on him online in disagreement. Some agreed with him fiercely and others stepped in to keep his detractors some
This kid may be one of the great shit posters of our time
0
0
0
It’s a tragedy that Judith Butler is representative of so-called “continental” philosophy. Do better.
0
0
1
Honestly.. to all of you getting butthurt about an *undergrad* writing an article about continental philosophy…. I expected more. Genuinely. Where tf is that intellectual fortitude that studying philosophy is supposed to develop? If you insult the kid in lieu of anything
@2oovy Write a critique or stfu. Also you failed immediately at what you said you were going to try to do. I don’t even agree with his critique, but I’m empathetic to it. Importantly, the pathetic online bullying of someone who has the balls to put his thoughts out there has gone far
0
1
4
Again, it's better to be charitable to your opponent when debating them. Then, when you're right, it's a lot more defensible.
@PaulNedelisky And here ya go. I even asked Grok to evaluate this little disagreement, and even pushed back against Grok in your favor when I felt Grok's analysis was being overly critical of your argument. The link to the entire conversation:
0
0
2
Someone write a "response article" already. Preferably someone who knows how to properly advance an argument. So many bad takes coming out of the woodwork (or "would-work" lmao) that are significantly worse than the original article.
@PaulNedelisky Right, and to my primary point, the part that comes after "if it weren't perfectly clear ... that would have no bearing on his critique": an instance of him being unclear does not mean he is wrong in critiquing another as unclear. In fact, I would love to hear what you think
0
0
1
Diving into “The Existence of God” 2nd edition, by Swinburne. I’ve heard the Bayesian machine is cranked up to 10 in this one. Looking forward. After @Philip_Goff’s “Why?”, I feel it’s time to embrace the inductive arguments more readily
0
0
1
This is a big one! Happy Monday
Khalani x @Collab_Land_ 🤝 Soon, communities will be able to bridge, swap, or stake directly inside Discord - powered by Khalani’s intent layer. Onchain questing, made seamless. ⚡️ 🔗 https://t.co/he0Qbf1A16
0
0
3
1) analytic philosophy can help you confidently demarcate the *boundary* between articulable and inarticulable 2) not all philosophers choose to reject the reality of the inarticulable 3) strict demarcation is a tool of thought, not the rule of thought 4) what a philosopher does
academic.oup.com
Abstract. Paradox drives a good deal of philosophy in every tradition. In the Indian and Western traditions, there is a tendency among many (but not all) p
0
0
2
I'm not saying LLMs are not conscious... But I *am* saying that the data we regard as evidence of consciousness is equally applicable to a calculator, a word processor, or a computer terminal. I am also saying consciousness itself does not entail normative properties. A
1
2
3
Threw a party in königsburg and of course this is what I find at the end of the night 😭
4
55
906
Where is the mute button for “anything coming out of the SF tech scene”? The performative BS is really striking. Rudimentary math at parties is neither a flex nor an embarrassment. Sharing it as if it is a flex is embarrassing, though. Coding while you’re supposed to be dining
1
0
7
Does the absence of memory imply the absence of consciousness? How do you know you "lose" consciousness during deep, non-REM sleep or anaesthesia?
0
0
1
hmm, brains have thoughts? Where are they?
🚨 Confirmed: Schizophrenia’s “voices” are the brain mishearing its own thoughts. For decades, neuroscientists have theorized that the "voices" heard by individuals with schizophrenia stem from the brain mistaking its own inner dialogue for external sounds. A groundbreaking
0
0
0