Alex Thorn
@intangiblecoins
Followers
56K
Following
103K
Media
4K
Statuses
18K
Head of Firmwide Research $GLXY @galaxyhq @glxyresearch đď¸https://t.co/C0Vf35sWm9 Former VC @Fidelity Loyal patron @pubkey_nyc disclaim https://t.co/wlEnSXUSy7
đşđ¸đŠđ
Joined August 2017
HISTORY IS LONGER THAN YOU THINK no global leader alive has governed under a hard money standard. not one will that always be true? i donât think so bitcoin disrupts â not by accident, but by design
8
26
139
here are my written remarks
0
0
2
in early december, i addressed the SECâs investor advisory committee regarding tokenization of equities i cooked on this opening statement if i may say so myself
5
1
31
This week on Galaxy Grid â a weekly video series from @glxyresearch. @intangiblecoins, @ninja_five_, @Uptodatenow, and @ZackPokorny_ unpack the stories shaping crypto â what happened, why it matters, and whatâs next. Episode 10 is live now ⤾ď¸
3
8
23
just landed MIA>LGA and took almost 3 full hours. how is this possible???
1
0
2
i went to miami for 18 hours - uberâs GPS way off (said 16 min wait but arrived in 4, then said âride endedâ 1mi from dest) - in south beach but no cell service on ATT?? - flight should be 2 hrs to NYC but is ~3 on delta? - all elevators broken is miami the bermuda triangle?
11
1
42
build digital money upon digital credit upon digital capital @saylor
4
0
22
just landed in miami for a quick 18 hours to record a very special episode of galaxy brains
7
2
87
Great post by @intangiblecoins. Full agree. The last six months of crypto coverage have fully and finally shattered the Gell-Mann Amnesia Effect for me at the NYT. Hard to read it now on anything. I feel it as a real loss.
i really want to believe that NYT is trustworthy but that has become nearly impossible the whole framing of this new crypto story (yet again) relies on the (false) premise that the prior adminâs attack on crypto totally normal it wasnât the attack was widely rebuked for years
4
11
106
Important post by @intangiblecoins. The NYT narrative is completely disconnected from reality.
i really want to believe that NYT is trustworthy but that has become nearly impossible the whole framing of this new crypto story (yet again) relies on the (false) premise that the prior adminâs attack on crypto totally normal it wasnât the attack was widely rebuked for years
1
4
31
I, unfortunately, agree with every word that @intangiblecoins just said about the @nytimes here. To say this article was biased or lacking context would be like saying water is damp. The dishonesty also makes it hard for crypto folks to bother with the NYT going forward.
i really want to believe that NYT is trustworthy but that has become nearly impossible the whole framing of this new crypto story (yet again) relies on the (false) premise that the prior adminâs attack on crypto totally normal it wasnât the attack was widely rebuked for years
16
19
159
I do appreciate the reporter's candor in the comments to the online version of the story: "there is no indication that president or the White House pressured the S.E.C. to go easy on specific crypto firms, and we did not find evidence that the firms had tried to influence the
i really want to believe that NYT is trustworthy but that has become nearly impossible the whole framing of this new crypto story (yet again) relies on the (false) premise that the prior adminâs attack on crypto totally normal it wasnât the attack was widely rebuked for years
36
75
479
I 100% agree with Alex here. But I also get more confident as the deranged hit pieces come in quicker succession... This group wouldn't be running a constant barrage of hit pieces if they weren't worried that market structure legislation was making real progress.
i really want to believe that NYT is trustworthy but that has become nearly impossible the whole framing of this new crypto story (yet again) relies on the (false) premise that the prior adminâs attack on crypto totally normal it wasnât the attack was widely rebuked for years
1
5
23
When I read this NYT article on the SEC's approach to crypto yesterday, I was outraged and submitted a comment on the article that has not been approved. I suspect it may not ever be approved. I happened to save the text since I was on my phone and paranoid about losing the
i really want to believe that NYT is trustworthy but that has become nearly impossible the whole framing of this new crypto story (yet again) relies on the (false) premise that the prior adminâs attack on crypto totally normal it wasnât the attack was widely rebuked for years
73
132
731
@AchimWar @thetrocro the NYT article spends a while explaining how cases were dropped, and some of those cases were against donors to the president. (it implies impropriety. let alone the fact that in the third image NYT expressly states that they have no evidence of the president intervening or any
4
4
34
an even more thorough explanation of why framing the SEC pivot as surprising or âirregularâ is totally misleading
@AchimWar @thetrocro the NYT article spends a while explaining how cases were dropped, and some of those cases were against donors to the president. (it implies impropriety. let alone the fact that in the third image NYT expressly states that they have no evidence of the president intervening or any
1
3
58
i really want to believe that NYT is trustworthy but that has become nearly impossible the whole framing of this new crypto story (yet again) relies on the (false) premise that the prior adminâs attack on crypto totally normal it wasnât the attack was widely rebuked for years
67
113
673