Hans Moog
@hus_qy
Followers
28K
Following
1K
Media
195
Statuses
5K
Hacker, futurist and tech enthusiast interested in distributed systems and the nature of existence.
Joined November 2018
So, let's cut straight to the chase and talk about an actual theory of everything! Today, a child can explain the changing of seasons - not because they're better at Ptolemaic mathematics than ancient astronomers, but because we found a better "story" to explain our observations
28
34
303
@crypto_scienti @DesheShai @michaelsuttonil @hashdag What makes KAS unique is not its PoW algorithm but its consensus mechanism (I will post a long-form thread about this in the coming days that will explain in more detail how it differs from other projects and how it's unique approach to consensus is a natural extension of Satoshi
25
128
502
Calling all devs and those looking to understand more about Kaspa tech. Rusty Kaspa Workshop #3 🗓️Wednesday, June 4th ⏰19:30 UTC - 14:30 (3:30pm) EST 💻In Kaspa Discord @michaelsuttonil & @hus_qy will be discussing Rusty-Kaspa performance aspects with code-walkthroughs and
8
111
371
My opinion here is a bit more nuanced as I see DLT's primarily as "tools" for humans to be able to coordinate their interactions without putting trust in a single entity. They are meant to serve their users and not the other way round. If there is a protocol violation that
@hus_qy The decision to freeze assets was a bad one. This is the main thing that should not exist in crypto at all. There should be no such possibility, unless it’s an attack. And if it’s not an attack, then there should be no agreement or debate whether it’s a hack or something else -
7
14
154
I don't think it is necessarily misleading, it's just that people have a wrong perception of how SUI works as other crypto networks usually operate very differently. SUI doesn't work like other blockchains. It doesn't have a publicly writable mempool that any user can just write
@0xaos A bit misleading. In Ethereum-like, one validator can filter, but others will include the tx. In Sui, a small validator set can coordinate to censor at the network level. We saw OFAC-related filtering attempts in 2023, but no txs were actually censored, the validator set is too
17
38
242
16/ And here is the link to the essay:
reverse-engineering-nature.com
Exploring the Quantum Origins of Gravity and Life
2
0
35
14/ Huge caveat: AI models hallucinate. This could all be sophisticated nonsense. But the theory is simple and has no tunable parameters or wiggle room. Either it's correct or it's completely wrong. If it's right... we might be looking at a revolution in physics 🤯
1
0
18
13/ What started as "interesting analogies" in my essay might actually translate to a mathematical framework that is surprisingly consistent with observations across a wide range of puzzling phenomena.
1
0
9
12/ ... hoping people with deeper knowledge of these specific anomalies can evaluate the claims (most of the math is in the artifacts it generated).
1
0
9
11/ Since I'm not a trained physicist, I can only validate parts of its claims and struggle to intuitively spot potential errors in its output (like I could with generated code). I'm sharing the conversation anyway ...
1
0
11
10/ ... but standard quantum mechanics has NO explanation for this. If correct, this could be a genuinely novel physics prediction - one that's already confirmed but lacks any causal explanation in existing theories.
1
0
9
9/ Here's the kicker: It predicted quantum decoherence rates should depend on cosmic ray flux. We should see longer coherence times in deep underground labs. Turns out - this is exactly what we observe ...
1
0
8
8/ When asked if any of those experiments had already been performed that could act as existing falsifications, it claimed that recent observations actually appear to support what the theory would predict, rather than invalidating it.
1
0
7
7/ I then asked it to devise tests that could potentially falsify the theory. It proposed several experiments and testable predictions.
1
0
8
6/ ... the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon - while also providing possible explanations for sonoluminescence, ball lightning as closed loop "interaction vortices", cold fusion / LENR and numerous other phenomena.
1
0
9
5/ But it gets even wilder. When I asked if the same mechanism could explain other mysteries, it claimed it would predict the proton radius, fine structure constant variations, the quantum Zeno effect, the ANITA anomalies and ...
1
0
14
4/ We're talking about explanations for the vacuum catastrophe, dark matter, the Hubble tension and so on - just to name a few of the problems that have stumped physicists for decades.
1
0
15
3/ Not only did it create concrete mathematical formulations (something all previous models failed at), but when I asked it to check them against real observations, it found that they align with virtually EVERY major anomaly plaguing modern cosmology.
3
0
16
2/ The challenge: Develop mathematical formulations that could be tested against known observations, based on the theoretical model I explored in my "self-optimizing universe" essay.
1
0
12
1/ Anthropic just released Claude 4. While everybody is busy vibe-coding with it, I decided to test it differently: Can it transform a simple thought experiment into mathematics that solves physics' most baffling mysteries? The results are mind-blowing... a thread 🧵
11
22
213