gloria Profile
gloria

@glozow

Followers
17K
Following
6K
Media
116
Statuses
2K

working on @bitcoincoreorg at @chaincodelabs 6B002C6EA3F91B1B0DF0C9BC8F617F1200A6D25C

Joined May 2019
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@glozow
gloria
2 days
RT @bitcoinoptech: Improve TxOrphanage denial of service bounds is a PR by @glozow that changes TxOrphanage eviction logic to guarantee eac….
0
2
0
@glozow
gloria
15 days
RT @bitcoincoreorg: Bitcoin Core v28.2 was released!.It is available from: Release notes:
0
73
0
@glozow
gloria
24 days
RT @dergoegge: Fuzzamoto just found its first bug on a Bitcoin Core PR🐛
Tweet media one
0
29
0
@glozow
gloria
27 days
Hosting a meeting today to Save The (Transaction) Orphans from churn and make 1p1c package relay more reliable! Please join us if you're into nerdy shit like:.- Defining a memory and CPU usage score to identify our DoSiest peers.- Attempting to ensure each peer has some.
4
5
45
@glozow
gloria
27 days
RT @theinstagibbs: 🫡 also looks like truc/P2A/ephemeral dust is being supported by a number of mining pools .
0
1
0
@glozow
gloria
27 days
RT @ChaincodeLabs: Nominations are open for the 2025 Bitcoin Research Prize!. Submit papers that made an impact on Bitcoin or Lightning pub….
0
27
0
@glozow
gloria
1 month
Reminiscing about the "Brink has too many maintainers" days. The memes now are more creative though.
7
2
44
@glozow
gloria
1 month
RT @coincenter: Update on the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act: . A joint statement with @btcpolicyorg @blockchainassn @coincenter @cryp….
0
23
0
@glozow
gloria
1 month
A comment on whether this process was “rushed”. As someone who has both authored and merged mempool policy changes for the last 4 years, I’d say this is par for the course. - The original PR was discussed around 2 years ago (of course, echoing arguments that were made 10 years.
8
0
76
@glozow
gloria
1 month
Link to the merge post: . @achow101 also reviewed this PR as a 5h livestream 2 years ago, I also wrote a summary for why #28408 should not be merged. It is similar: If you are interested in the PR review.
1
3
67
@glozow
gloria
1 month
I posted a full writeup for the #32406 merge decision on the PR. These changes go into effect in v30, which is scheduled for release in October. The PR changes the defalt value of -datacarriersize. You will still be able to use -datacarrier and -datacarriersize options in v30,.
111
72
440
@glozow
gloria
1 month
There have been a number demands that Bitcoin Core use transaction relay policy to prevent certain kinds of transactions from being mined based on use case. This idea has been controversial for various reasons, including:.- Bitcoin Core is a completely voluntary piece of software.
@bitcoincoreorg
Bitcoin Core Project
1 month
A statement on Bitcoin Core development and transaction relay policy -
83
36
244
@glozow
gloria
1 month
RT @bitcoincoreorg: A statement on Bitcoin Core development and transaction relay policy -
0
173
0
@glozow
gloria
1 month
RT @ChaincodeLabs: Is Bitcoin ready for the quantum era?. Read our report at:. @ClaraShik & @ozdeadman explore the….
0
85
0
@glozow
gloria
2 months
In case it wasn't already clear, this suggestion is the only PR that is open at the moment. #32406 changes the default -datacarriersize and leaves the config option intact.
@callebtc
calle
2 months
A good compromise between both camps could be to change the OP_RETURN defaults as originally intended and leave users the option to adjust their node's parameters. That way, users who don't agree can opt out and still use Core. And we all march stronger into the future.
39
12
125
@glozow
gloria
2 months
Generally, it is resource intensive and unreasonable to demand a full refutation each time Luke makes an accusation against Core, and I'm not going to make this a regular thing. Instead, I request that everybody ask *him* to provide evidence when he makes claims.
9
9
119
@glozow
gloria
2 months
People are asking about "Luke being hacked/removed from the Transifex" so here is the full IRC log from that day. Here is a summary (please do your own reading + let me know if you think this is misrepresentative and I'm happy to edit it):.1. Translators.
@glozow
gloria
2 months
Bitcoin Core's supported features, including translations, come from the community. Please contribute translations and review - we frequently see scams, ads, and garbage stuffed into translation strings. Unfortunately, that often means removing translation updates wholesale. Devs.
14
28
184
@glozow
gloria
2 months
Update for recent events: one of the PRs is now *closed* and not merged.
8
7
89
@glozow
gloria
2 months
Bitcoin Core has not merged any of the PRs changing OP_RETURN limits. Observe that the PRs are still open. PRs that change userspace or change policy defaults require release notes. It was apparent OP_RETURN limit changes would.
33
50
288