SA’s legal team for its case to the International Court of Justice against Israel: John Dugard SC, Max du Plessis SC, Tembeka Ngcukaitobi SC
Adila Hassim SC
Juniors: Sarah Pudifin-Jones, Lerato Zikalala, Tshidiso Ramogale
External: Vaughan Lowe KC
Blinne Ní Ghrálaigh KC
“I was also informed by Mr Ndou that Adv Mkhwebane had instructed him not to make any findings in the report against any politician. We were accordingly forced to remove any adverse finding [against] Mr Ace Magashule … and Mr Mosebenzi Zwane” - Tebogo Kekana, PP Snr investigator
Good morning from the Hague. I’m on my way to court now. There are planned gatherings / protests outside the court as well as supporters of South Africa and Palestine.
Just for interest’s sake, Judge Selby Baqwa - one of the judges who handed down today’s judgment setting aside the Public Protector’s “rogue unit” report - was SA’s first public protector.
JUST IN: Suspended PP Mkhwebane has lost her application for leave to appeal in the WCHC - about going back to work. She has been ordered to pay costs personally - jointly and severally with the 10th, 11th and 16th respondents. (I THINK those respondents are the UDM, ATM and PAC)
One of my first stories as a journalist (2008 I think) was about the amadiba crisis committee fighting to protect Xolobeni. This community has BEEN fighting, for years, against multinationals. Today it is taking on Shell in the Eastern Cape High Court. Such an important case.
The growing tendency to question the integrity of judges and senior counsel for representing people we don’t like or when they come to conclusions we don’t like is disturbing. Can we critique the decision and not the person please?
Just in: Former President Jacob Zuma has lost his appeal against the personal costs order against him by the Pretoria High Court when he challenged the State of Capture Report. And SCA has also given a punitive costs order for appeal - attorney and client scale.
Members of the SA team who will be in the Hague to note ICJ’s order on Friday (in the SA v Israel case):
John Dugard SC
Blinne Ni Ghrálaigh KC
Sarah Pudifin-Jones
Ambassador Madonsela
Minister Pandor
Nokukhanya Jele
DG Dangor
Cornelius Scholtz
Clayson Monyela
The Minister of Electricity has been ordered by the Pretoria High Court to take “all reasonable steps” to ensure that public hospitals, clinics schools and police stations have uninterrupted electricity by 31 January.
It doesn’t matter how many sock puppets come on here and shout about
@karynmaughan
being “in the dock”, and how many bots retweet it, it won’t take away from the fact that that the charge is spurious. Maybe it’s political theatre but in law it’s going nowhere.
My first encounter with Justice Mokgoro was in the first few weeks when I clerked at the ConCourt. We were, all the clerks, instructed to meet her in the library.
As I sit here anxiously waiting for the judgment, I’m thinking about these words from Justice Khampepe: “It is the lofty and lonely work of the judiciary, impervious to public commentary and political rhetoric, to uphold, protect and apply the law at any and all cost.”
Just in: The Constitutional Court has dismissed second rescission application by suspended PP Busisiwe Mkhwebane and ordered her to pay costs in her personal capacity.
Khampepe ADCJ: “No one is above the law ... If with impunity litigants are allowed to decide which orders they wish to obey and which they wish to ignore, then our constitution is not worth the paper on which it is written.”
Just in: the Constitutional Court has dismissed the public protector’s application to rescind its judgment on her CR17 report, saying “no case has been made out for rescission”.
Statement by Advocates For Transformation on commentary on whether Mahlape Sello SC should have accepted appointment to s89 panel. “Advocates are independent and cannot be associated with the causes of their clients.
It was perfectly legitimate for Sello SC to accept the brief”
Tjo, this judgment: “The clear inference I draw from the evidence is that once the Minister had declared a national state of disaster ... little or in fact no regard was given to the extent of the impact of individual regulations on the constitutional rights of people...”
So pleased about the truly kick-ass women on the Johannesburg Bar’s silk list: Carol Steinberg, Adila Hassim, Kate Hofmeyr, and Michelle Le Roux. And my law school bestie, Richard Moultrie, also recommended. Mazeltov guys, so well deserved!
Today, from 3pm to 5pm, the International Court of Justice will hear oral argument by South Africa for an urgent request for the indication of new provisional measures in its genocide case against Israel
State Capture report says after Fraser was appointed at SSA “budgetary allocations increased from about R42m in the 2016/17 financial year to about R303m in the 2017/18 financial year”. Approx 74% of which “was used for covert operations from his office”.
Just in: Sesi Baloyi SC to be appointed to the Judicial Service Commission as one of president’s nominees. President Ramaphosa has decided to replace Madonsela SC. He has, in line with Constitution, written to leaders of political parties in Parliament and asked for their views.
National Association of Democratic Lawyers (Nadel) statement on JG Zuma Foundation’s media statement - “statement is an affront to our constitutional order”
Yesterday I read the State Capture Commission’s heads of argument in its ConCourt application to compel former Pres JG Zuma to abide by summonses and come testify. One section of the heads lists “highlights” of the allegations Mr Zuma has been called on to answer to. Check them:
Judgment opens with Nelson Mandela’s words when he inaugurated the ConCourt: “We expect you to stand on guard not only against direct assault on the principles of the constitution, but against insidious corrosion.”
Just in: the Western Cape High Court has declared invalid the suspension of Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebani. However, in terms of s172 (2) of the Constitution a HC order on the constitutional validity of conduct of the President, has no force unless it is confirmed by the CC.
Theron J wants us to be very clear: "Mindful of the intense public interest in this case, let me be absolutely clear: both this judgment and the main judgment would impose a period of imprisonment on Mr Zuma because he is in contempt of this Court’s order."
Sub judice has got to be the most abused / wrongly used legal term in SA. MOST of the time, when someone says something is sub judice, it really isn’t.
Just in: Constitutional Court will hand down judgment tomorrow in application by Zondo Commission to order former President Zuma to appear at commission as per summons.
My favourite part of Fabricius J’s judgment (so far, still reading) is para 89 where he says there is no legal or moral equivalence between civilians disobeying lockdown rules and soldiers violating constitutional, international and statutory principles on excessive use of force.
Unterhalter J: listing all the cases he did pro bono reminds commissioner Malema that he acted pro bono for the EFF and the only compensation he asked for was a red beret, which he never got.
The
#Constitution
was first adopted by the Constitutional Assembly on 8 May 1996
Former Pres Mbeki delivered his ''I Am an African'' speech on this occasion
#28years
Speech Text:
Video:
Constitution:
JUST IN: Former President Jacob Zuma has filed an affidavit in the court battle between SARS and the Public Protector over his tax records - being heard in court tomorrow
My kid studying for Geography test: “Pretoria is the executive capital, Cape Town is the thingy, where Parliament is” Me: “Legislative.” Her: Yes. And Bloemfontein is the judicial capital. I remember because all I’ve heard since the day I was born is “Judical Service Commission”
Just in: Chief justice Zondo has just announced that practitioners and academics (and not only judges) can be appointed directly to the constitutional court. He has invited two practitioners and one academic to act before JSC’s April interviews.
Sometimes it’s good when the silks don’t make it to court. If Trengove SC or Ngcukaitobi SC had been here, I might not have seen their junior, Ndumiso Luthuli on his feet, killing it in court.
Now up Lowe KC on the provisional measures sought. Explaining why SA not seeking an order against Hamas: Hamas is not a state and cannot be a party to the Genocide Convention and SA cannot seek an order from this court against Hamas
Public Protector loses her appeal at the ConCourt. She must pay personal and punitive costs. ConCourt says she acted in faith, fell “egregiously short” of what was expected of her and was not honest.
Roets and AfriForum win in contempt of
#ApartheidFlag
case. Lamont J says there is no contempt of court because for contempt, there must be a court order instructing someone to do something. Mojapelo’s order was a declaratory order and intended to be so.
#ApartheidFlag
This year Mother’s Day involved being woken up at five because help was needed to prepare the special Mother’s Day breakfast that was being brought to me in bed and pretending this had never happened. And now I’ve just seen the state of the kitchen 🙈😓
Just taking a moment to thank
@WhyJudgesMatter
for its very important work in keeping records and archives of JSC interviews and other information about the judiciary- all available for free to the public. Such an important resource. Thank you.
A thread on Justice Jody Kollapen, the burdens of judicial office and the rule of law. Last night I had the privilege to attend an event in Laudium to honour Justice Kollapen, recently appointed to the Constitutional Court.
Chrispin Phiri on that article by Minister Lindiwe Sisulu: “Perhaps the author's attack on the Constitution and the judiciary is really an attack on power being held to account. And here, it might be worthwhile to do some introspection on motives.”
Just in: the High Court has dismissed Hlophe JPs application to review the JSC’s gross misconduct decision. (I’m still to read the judgment but here is the order)
Nugent JA unimpressed with Bain paying back R217 million to SARS yet not coming clean with the commisson. “Payment of money without prior disclosure of the truth, is not reparation but is marketing instead”.
Freedom Under Law spitting fire in court papers in DA v IEC case. Says the IEC acted lawfully in amending the election timetable and it’s not for the DA (or any party) to tell the IEC what is “reasonably necessary”. One by one, gives all the political parties hell.
Just in: the formal hand over of state capture report to president Ramaphosa will proceed as planned. The application to block it was struck from the roll because of self-created urgency. Also, a punitive costs order against Democracy In Action.
The PP won’t be opposing Ramaphosa’s urgent interim interdict in Bosasa case. This follows a letter from NDPP saying the PP may only “notify” the NDPP of her opinion. (Meanwhile PP had instructed her to investigate “prima facie money laundering”)
Genuine question: I'm reading through transcripts of the ICJ hearing, can anyone help with why Israel said SA relied on Hamas stats for number of killings of Palestinians (because the transcript referred to UN report)?
A historic moment: the National Assembly has passed a resolution, by 305 votes to 27, for the removal of Judge President Hlophe. The first impeachment of a judge in the history of South Africa since the dawn of democracy.
Lamola says if it wasn’t for a fiercely independent judiciary, our fiscus would have been looted to a total collapse. He thanks the judiciary for its role.
Just in: Judicial Conduct Appeal Committee has, by majority, upheld the JCCC decision that former CJ breached the judicial code with his comments about SA’s policy towards Israel and must apologise.
JUST IN: The Constitutional Court has dismissed an application for leave to appeal against the decision of the SCA on former President Jacob Zuma’s medical parole, saying it bears “no reasonable prospects of success”.
Just in: the Democratic Alliance has urgently applied to the Constitutional Court to declare the decision by the Electoral Court to reopen the candidate nomination process unconstitutional and invalid; and to set it aside
JUST IN: The ConCourt has dismissed the direct access application from the Khosa family over SANDF and police brutality saying there were “insufficient grounds raised for direct access”.
@mailandguardian
“1994 was no idle transition; it was the result of a conscious choice and commitment that we would henceforth live a new life and be governed in a new way...” - Former Justice Pius Langa
#FreedomMonth
#ocj_rsa
📷:
The General Council of the Bar’s statement on Walus judgment. The judgment “was a unanimous one. Gratuitous attacks on the judiciary, and singling out individual Justices for gratuitous attack, only serve to undermine the rule of law”.
In a unanimous judgment penned by Theron J - the ConCourt has decided that former president Jacob Zuma is disqualified from standing for parliament. It also rejected his claim that the IECs decision was tainted by bias. I’m still to read the judgment.
Just thinking, after Steven Budlender’s 🔥 address today, how big a contribution he has made to jurisprudence in areas of law close to my heart: freedom of expression and the rights of refugees and migrants, often on a pro bono basis. His departure from the Bar really is a loss.
A helpful thread on South Africa’s case before the ICJ - explaining the difference between the International Criminal Court process, and some jurisdictional and evidential hurdles SA may have to traverse. Also, the significance of the ICJ’s power to order “provisional measures”
JUST IN: Retired Judges Seriti and Musi have gone the HC to challenge the constitutionality of the JSC Act in so far as it allows the JSC and JCC to hold retired judges accountable for misconduct.
President Ramaphosa wants the ConCourt to hear Public Protector’s withdrawn appeal against the interim interdict granted by Potterill J. President says it is in the national interest for highest court to end “vituperative” public debate.
Very important judgment from the ConCourt today on the powers of the courts to interdict remedial action of the public protector. Here’s my write-up of the argument