Fluxor
@fluxorapp
Followers
597
Following
12
Media
9
Statuses
32
Neobank infrastructure for tokenized art assets, focused on practical yields, payments, and creator-led financial tools.
onchain
Joined January 2026
1
0
4
Integrating @openclaw automation agents into Fluxor's infrastructure. Here's why this matters: Art-backed finance requires constant monitoring—LTV ratios, liquidity depth, yield opportunities, portfolio balance. Doing this manually doesn't scale. Openclaw's agents handle the
3
0
2
Integrating @openclaw automation agents into Fluxor's infrastructure. Here's why this matters: Art-backed finance requires constant monitoring—LTV ratios, liquidity depth, yield opportunities, portfolio balance. Doing this manually doesn't scale. Moltbot's agents handle the
0
1
9
1,000 people signed up for Fluxor early access. Creators, collectors, and builders who see what we see: Tokenized art has value. It just needs infrastructure that actually works.
They sold you ownership. You held. They traded. You waited. You got the art. They got the upside. Time to flip that. Fluxor early access - make your art productive. https://t.co/rl1liZgEV9
17
3
60
Everyone obsesses over "finding the right price." What if that's the wrong question for cultural assets? Art's value is contextual, not objective. Fluxor doesn't try to price art perfectly. We use conservative ranges and move on. Utility > precision.
10
1
32
Art shouldn't have to choose between sitting idle and being disposable. Stable, not static. That's the third model. That's what Fluxor is building.
1
0
4
8/ Think of it like a home equity line: Your house stays yours (stable). You borrow against it when needed (not static). Conservative LTV = you survive downturns. Same concept. Different asset class.
2
0
6
7/ Why this matters: Cultural assets want to stay with people who value them, while still being economically useful. That's not temporary (crypto). That's not static (TradFi). That's stable.
1
0
2
6/ How we do it: Conservative valuation: AI assigns risk bands, not minute-by-minute prices Vault liquidity: withdrawals from pooled capital, not forced art sales Low leverage: 30-50% LTV vs. 80%+ in DeFi
1
0
0
5/ Not static = capital still works - Yield accrues continuously - Users can borrow against positions - Liquidity from vault design, not asset sales
1
0
0
4/ Fluxor's answer: stable, not static. Stable = position doesn't move unless necessary - Art stays as collateral long-term - No forced liquidations - Episodic valuation, not continuous
1
0
0
3 / Tokenized art sits uncomfortably between: - Liquid enough to tokenize - Not liquid enough for DeFi's speed - Valuable enough to collateralize - Not stable enough for TradFi's permanence It needs a third model.
1
0
0
2/ In TradFi, collateral stays put: 30-year mortgages - Annual appraisals - Relationship banking - This works for real estate. It doesn't scale for tokenized art. Too slow, too manual, no composability.
1
0
2
1/ In DeFi, collateral is designed to move: - Liquidations at 15% drawdown - Prices update every block - Exit is automatic This works for ETH or stablecoins. It destroys art. Fire sales during stress erase cultural and economic value.
1
0
2
The Collateral Paradox: Crypto treats collateral as temporary: constant repricing, instant liquidation, high velocity. TradFi treats it as permanent: locked for years, manual appraisals, rarely moves. Tokenized art doesn't fit either model.
5
2
19
They sold you ownership. You held. They traded. You waited. You got the art. They got the upside. Time to flip that. Fluxor early access - make your art productive. https://t.co/rl1liZgEV9
49
33
129
One addition worth watching: neobanks designed for subjective-value collateral. Most of the map = objective assets (stables, treasuries, equities). But onchain value increasingly includes: • Tokenized art • Cultural capital • Creator-backed positions These need different
6
0
22