Important legal cases, 1754: . "He admitted that a sturgeon and a whale were royal fish, but they were governed by widely different principles of law. If a sturgeon had been washed on the shore, then the King or his grantee could claim it and grant it to whomsoever they.

The Le Lain brothers are very underrated. Three brothers, 1600s, Paris, high-quality interesting scenes with nice execution.

A.D. 2100. MARRIAGE IN HIGH LIFE. On the instant, at St Battery, by special licence of the Metropolitan Model: the Nuptial Rites of the ChatGPT Communion were solemnised by the Rev. Father Chat-GPT; the vows, according to the open source manner of Gemini Use, were received at.

Here's a nice one-shot from Claude:. "I think we're watching something unprecedented: the first generation to have the option of never being alone with their thoughts or conflicts. The implications feel enormous.".

A brand is not an identity. Reliance on marketing as a proxy for quality is buying a mirage of undifferentiated replicas. Abandon thoughtless consumerism. Buy works that inspire the soul. And for heavens sake, have an opinion on something other than XYZ apple product.

I'm fairly certain it is actually on Hanover Square based on her subsequent diary entries, but at a loss as to where.

Can any London history buffs help me with a small mystery? . In 1875 my x2 great-aunt wrote in her diary that she arrived in London via Palace Car and stayed at a private boarding house "nicely situated at the corner of Hanover Square and Lambeth [??].". Ideas on the address?.

To protect yourself, if you read this article and find much you agree with, make sure to not use AI! . You may already be at risk from the mindvirus due to syncophantic complicity with this narrative!

LLMs sort of broke the verification economy: generating a quantum physics "proof" costs nothing, verifying it costs a PhD. We've ended up with a ton of chatholes. aka regions where plausibility exceeds verifiability. The WSJ documented LLMs amplifying delusional episodes. But.

Well I’ll be damned, it’s a real thing. Learn something new every day.

Somewhat unexpected terminology from Gemini 2.5 Pro in a dense mathematical review 😂😂

GPT-5 Pro (python+search with blocklist): 42% on Humanity's Last Exam. GPT-5 Pro (no tools): 30.7%. Deep Think is 34.8%.

Fascinating work!.

Once upon a time, I, Zhuangzi, dreamt I was a butterfly, fluttering hither and thither, to all intents and purposes a butterfly. I was conscious only of my happiness as a butterfly, unaware that I was Zhuangzi. Soon I awoke, and there I was, veritably myself again. Now I do not.

A huge proportion of startups reach out to us with LLM generated business descriptions @CharacterVC now. No problem on the surface, but it's made writing less of a signal (stellar and less-stellar teams both use it). New proxy for execution is found in execution primarily? 😅.

The prompt was:. Please create a full academic paper that answers the following question:. What are the total number of dinosaur species that existed?. Develop a comprehensive statistical, or otherwise mathematical model that you will utilize in the paper in your estimation of.

B:. The Invisible Mesozoic: Estimating Total Dinosaur Species Richness Through a Size-Dependent Taphonomic Model. Abstract. Quantifying the total species richness of extinct clades is fundamental to understanding macroevolutionary dynamics. For the Dinosauria (excluding Aves),.

A:. Estimating the Historical Species Richness of Dinosauria:.A Bayesian Multi-Method Approach. Abstract. How many dinosaur species ever existed? Because the fossil record is profoundly incomplete, the answer is not recorded directly in stone. Here I integrate four.

Model comparison: Deep Think versus o3. Take a look at the papers below, which was written by o3 and which was written by Deep Think?. Topic: What are the total number of dinosaur species that existed?.