my fav volcano is now covered in snow i love you

long-form thought, craft, real-world motion

i don't care about gold for speculation, but i love it for what it is: a reliable conductor in chips and spacecraft, a biocompatible metal in dentistry, a catalyst in chemistry, a radiant reflector in optics, and a timeless element of ritual, art, and beauty

I love books so much it hurts

depending on perspective, it's both a gift and a curse that we see everything through our relationship with ourselves. awareness is the pivot

mass liquidations and widespread uptober anticipations aren't contradictions; the latter is precise fuel for the former

as a lover of language and expression, there's so much i want to say. but how does anything ever rival the silence shared in motion with someone who already understands? silence isn't empty

it's so fun how all the value on blockchain accounts doesn't actually belong to any human but only to their respective private keys, i.e. cryptographic proofs

5am rn, let's shine

the beauty of 4am

oops i forgot i was in kyoto and osaka again before tokyo. well well

2025 city progression (288 days), chronologically: kyoto -> kagoshima -> fukuoka -> osaka -> berlin -> dubai -> fukuoka -> kagoshima -> hakodate -> aomori -> tokyo -> taipei -> hong kong -> shenzhen

why settle for black or white when life is the sea beyond; endless shades, always in motion

your body and mind should be your ferrari. not bought but forged

waking up naturally high is underrated

hearing monad makes me think of philosophy and Leibniz in particular

i got informed that i'm eligible for tokens of something called monad. i'm generally not into holding any vc exit tokens so i ignored the project till now. do you have 1 compelling line on how this is different. should i not swap on market open? ty ily

liminal meeting place rn

i like timeless beauty like math, silence, trees, moonlight

so elegant how mathematics is never down

let r=sensible regulation, c=criminal utility, k=regulatory capture. claim: ¬r∧c∧k explain failure. but c→¬r and k→¬r. the error assumes r was possible. yet if c∨k, then ¬◇r. therefore: can't claim 'too optimistic about r' while asserting c,k