DK
@dklymentiev
Followers
71
Following
27
Media
13
Statuses
253
Solo engineer. Building tools I actually use daily.
Chicago
Joined June 2025
Open source. MIT license. 10 examples in the repo, from hello-world to 97-block deliberation. If you've ever copy-pasted a 3000-token prompt trying to make one model do five things at once -- this is what you wanted.
0
0
0
What Rein handles: - Parallel execution with dependency graphs - Conditional branching, correction loops - Recovery: block 45 of 97 fails? Fix and rerun, 1-44 are skipped - Works with Claude, GPT, Ollama (free), OpenRouter - Also runs as an MCP server
1
0
0
Rein is the orchestrator behind this. Three text files: - Specialist (Markdown): what each agent does - Team (YAML): groups + shared tone - Workflow (YAML): execution flow That's the entire mental model. No frameworks, no abstractions. Describe what happens in what order.
1
0
0
The Child cut through 18 phases of philosophy: "The question '2+2=?' implicitly operates within standard arithmetic. Other systems exist but don't undermine the answer in the default context." Final vote: 8/8, 100% confidence. Skeptic: 72% -> 100%.
1
0
0
Skeptic challenged the Poet: "If 2+2=4 is merely system-relative, then so is the beauty you invoke. Your certainty is self-undermining." The Poet: "A poet who says 'all roses are red within this garden' need not pretend to stand outside all gardens to say so with conviction."
1
0
0
Then the Engineer surprised everyone: "Precision alone is insufficient for full understanding. Context, meaning, and human experience are legitimate dimensions of knowledge." An engineer arguing for poetry. That's what good multi-agent debate produces.
1
0
0
The Physics debate broke the deadlock. The Physicist pointed at actual stones. Two plus two, every time, four. The Skeptic conceded: "Physical reality provides a non-circular grounding, making '4' not merely conventional but empirically anchored."
1
0
0
The Skeptic opened at 72%: "2+2=4 relies entirely on accepting Peano axioms. In modular arithmetic mod 4, 2+2=0. The answer is framework-dependent, not absolute truth." Everyone else: 97-100%. That gap drove the entire deliberation.
1
0
0
The 8 specialists: Mathematician: Peano axioms Philosopher: do numbers even exist? Physicist: two stones + two stones Child: it's 4, everybody knows that Skeptic: 72% confidence Historian: 5000 years of consensus Poet: the universe's quietest poem Engineer: 4, +/- 0.01
1
0
0
I built 97 YAML blocks, 8 AI specialists, and 18 phases of deliberation to answer: what is 2+2? The most interesting character had only 72% confidence. A thread on multi-agent AI orchestration and the world's most over-engineered math problem.
1
0
0
One weekend to build. Zero ongoing costs. Three months of daily use. Sometimes the most impactful tool is the one that removes friction from what you do hundreds of times a day. Full writeup:
klymentiev.com
I built a voice input tool to talk to Claude instead of typing. My posture fixed itself. No cloud, no Whisper -- just Android's native speech recognition and local network.
0
0
0
60% of my voice input goes to Claude prompts. I have not written code manually in three months -- Claude Code handles that. Voice for intent. Model for code. Keyboard became optional.
1
0
0
I tried self-hosting Whisper, Faster Whisper, Vosk. All had problems. Android built-in speech recognition beat everything. Google spent billions on on-device recognition. I cannot compete on a single server. No cloud. No subscription. Local WiFi only.
1
0
0
I stopped typing three months ago. Built a voice tool: speak into phone, text appears on my workstation. 80 lines of Python. The unexpected result: my posture fixed itself. I finally use my standing desk.
1
0
0
New in Cowork: scheduled tasks. Claude can now complete recurring tasks at specific times automatically: a morning brief, weekly spreadsheet updates, Friday team presentations.
989
2K
22K
CLAUDE: If we imagine this as a clock face (12 o'clock at the top): Main satellites: Upper right (large): ~10 minutes (≈2 o'clock position) Right: ~20 minutes (≈4 o'clock position) Bottom: ~30 minutes (≈6 o'clock position) Lower left (with the "tail"): ~40 minutes (≈8
0
0
2
GEMINI: Top Right: 5 minutes (1 o'clock position) Right: 15 minutes (3 o'clock position) Bottom Right: 25 minutes (5 o'clock position) Bottom: 30 minutes (6 o'clock position) Bottom Left: 40 minutes (8 o'clock position) Left: 45 minutes (9 o'clock position) Top Left: 55 minutes
1
0
2