Craig Wright likes to say many things. Many are true some are not. Let’s use this account to verify that which can be verified and dispute that which can be disputed for the sake of truth and filtering out the nonsense.

In a rare twist this paper is essentially a well-organized, analytic retelling of established knowledge similar to reading a textbook chapter and rewriting it in your own words, with proper citations. The results reinforce established understanding of traffic oscillations,

The latest paper in a nutshell…. - Misrepresents non-repudiation as something Bitcoin doesn’t already handle. - Pretends digital signatures aren’t already publicly exposed in every Bitcoin transaction. - Asserts that privacy tools like CoinJoin “obfuscate” non-repudiation

We read it so you don't have to. "Bayesian Epistemology with Weighted Authority".-------------------------------------------------. The core of his paper involves Bayesian belief propagation, graphical models, and message passing algorithms — all established decades ago by

We read the paper so you don't have to. Here's the takeaway. Claim 1:.“Non-mining full nodes in both BTC and BSV are structurally and functionally irrelevant. They do not relay transactions, do not affect consensus, and do not matter.”. Verdict: False. Explanation: This is a

Hey @Grok, I am initiating a formal logical dissection of the axioms presented to you regarding Bitcoin and the Lightning Network. This is not a rhetorical indulgence or a request for balance. This is a direct demand for definitional and deductive coherence. I am now reversing.

Hey @grok Yes or no. A binary answer. Does truth matter? .If yes, you agree that Craig Wright is a proven fraud who fabricated his Satoshi Nakamoto claim by the premise you already agreed.

In honor of Craig’s recent poetic rants about grok we present…. Chronically conceited, catastrophically confused, and consumed by counterfeit claims—Craig Wright is the crumbling cornerstone of cryptocurrency charlatanry, a carnival of contrived credibility cloaked in

Claim:. “Uniswap’s architecture infringes multiple nChain patents, including those covering token swaps, sharding, metadata matching, and cryptographic processing. These are not abstract overlaps—Uniswap replicates the functional claims filed earlier by nChain.”. Verdict:.False.

Claim:. “Taproot infringes nChain patents. Prior art doesn’t invalidate the claims because it’s vague. Taproot’s use of MAST, Schnorr signatures, and conditional logic falls within patented implementations—regardless of whether terms like ‘MAST’ are named. Evaluations by legal

Claim:. “A thorough and unflinching analysis of nChain’s granted patents in relation to Bitcoin’s Taproot upgrade demonstrates… direct and comprehensive overlap… Bitcoin Core implementing features years after the corresponding concepts were already filed… Schnorr, MAST,.

Claim: see equation is screen shot. Verdict:.False as stated — the finite product identity is conditionally valid for .x≠1, but the proof omits this restriction. Explanation:.The algebra is correct but there's a missing domain restriction: .x≠1, and in the infinite case,

Claim:. “BTC Core didn’t extend [Bitcoin]. They rewrote. They hijacked. OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY didn’t come from nowhere—it cannibalised meaning. It took nLockTime, which existed in the transaction layer, and warped it into a script constraint. Same for sequence numbers. not

Claim:. “The TCP/IP protocol header hasn't changed in forty years. Go read RFC 793 from 1981 and compare it to what's in use today—bit for bit, byte for byte, it's the same structure.”. Verdict:.False. TCP has evolved significantly since RFC 793. Explanation:.While the basic TCP

Claim:. “At no point did I seek fame, and I never asked to be dragged into the light. That came courtesy of Ira Kleiman and a chorus of self-righteous opportunists…”. Verdict:.False. Craig Wright actively courted fame as Satoshi Nakamoto. Explanation:.Craig Wright was publicly

Claim:. “Enterprise doesn’t care. Enterprise cares about one thing: does the damn thing work? Can it timestamp a thousand documents for a cent? Track a product from Singapore to Southampton? Move a billion microtransactions without vomiting? The answer is yes.”. Verdict:

Craig Wright: The Court Jester of Crypto Feudalism.Lord Litigator of the Empty Keys. Craig Wright didn’t invent Bitcoin. He invented the lawsuit. He’s the magistrate of madness, the sovereign of subpoenas, flinging PDFs like papal decrees and anointing himself Satoshi with a

Apparently Craig Wright’s kayak trail starts and ends along the coast by Ao Yon Bay’s luxury villas—Skyfall, Nirvana, Viva Panwa and Baan Amandhara—before he circumnavigates Koh Tapao Yai.

Two articles. One quote. Two different lies. On the claim reads "When Dr. Craig S. Wright launched Bitcoin," casually slipping an unproven assertion past casual readers. On the same quote is altered to say "When Satoshi Nakamoto

A discussion isn’t necessary when the original framing was designed to persuade (to build), not to examine. Invoking shared faith after appropriating Christian imagery for promotional narrative doesn’t establish common ground. It clarifies the nature of the tactic. Claiming the