What an event! btc++ held our lightning++ edition in Berlin, Germany 🇩🇪 was such a thrilling experience. We had amazing speakers and bitcoin dev leaders showcasing their work. Thank you to everyone! Calle @callebtc of @CashuBTC Allen Farrington @allenf32 of FLUX Alex
11
16
93
Replies
Thank you to our Satoshi Level Sponsors @HRF @NYDIG Thank you to our Finney Level Sponsors @bitvmx @fulmolightning FLUX @base58btc @blocks @blockstr Thank you to our Wuille Level Sposnors @FulgurVentures @cakewallet @ElectrumWallet @spiralbtc @BitwiseInvest Thank you to our
0
13
24
Don’t risk Your personal account— Secure Your Capital Today with Breakout
114
159
1K
0
0
8
0
0
5
@btcplusplus @callebtc @CashuBTC @allenf32 huge thanks to @niftynei & team for hosting an amazing lightning++ in berlin 🇩🇪⚡️ you have a tremendous talent for bringing deeply technical events together that are enjoyable and foster great collaboration to solve some of bitcoin’s most technical challenges ✊
0
0
4
@btcplusplus @callebtc @CashuBTC @allenf32 Vielen Dank an alle für eine fantastische Veranstaltung! Bis bald!
0
0
3
@btcplusplus @callebtc @CashuBTC @allenf32 It sounds like an incredible event! The lightning++ edition in Berlin must have offered invaluable insights from leading experts. Engaging with trailblazers like Calle and Allen fosters innovation in the Bitcoin community. Exciting times ahead for all involved!
0
0
0
Sorry Max but this is flat out factually incorrect on point 2 - if the whole block was made up of OP RETURN, it'd be max 1MB, instead of the theoretical 4MB max size block. Not an increase. Another example of how misleading the narratives have been on this spam/filter question.
Two obvious failures of Op Return: 1. Adding ‘utility’ to Bitcoin diminishes its standing as a more perfect form of money. (I’ve written lots on this topic). 2. Increasing Blocksize increases centralization, again, diminishing its role as a more perfect form of money. (Read,
9
0
37
I regret to inform you that bitcoin has not yet solved the scaling problem in an ideologically coherent way (some will say scaling is solved, essentially, by custodians -- trusted third parties -- though they won't use that term. But that, in the limit, defeats the point of
28
4
74
