•
@brobromeow
Followers
353
Following
3K
Media
2K
Statuses
23K
A fundamentalist. Epistemology. Live on and keep striving Most of the time, I will have different opinion from you. Choose to be rude to unreasonable peep.
Joined March 2017
sepanjang kat twitter beberapa bulan ni, ada la few topik menarik yang dibincangkan. but since majoriti dah block aku (hahahaha), aku rasa bahagian aku dah selesai kot. kalau ada yang nak disekolahkan lagi, boleh bagitau. lepas ni, account ni akan jadi akaun personal balik~
3
1
6
How come jalankan company, whole rugi, and still keep the jawatan Anyone want to be a new ceo?
Resign @Parcel1Post, pack your stuff and go back to your country! Let the locals take over your role. Don’t ruin a local organisation! Step down!
0
2
0
Saman 10 juta, ok je ni
someone’s about to be an instant millionaire
0
0
0
Sebarkan, macam sebar fitnah. Fishy fishy Satu kerja nak kena audit diri sendiri semata mata taknak kena saman seterusnya
Jun 2022 OKS kumpul sumbangan awam untuk bayar jaminan (bail) mahkamah - sasaran RM8k - RM15k. Tak pasti berapa terkumpul dan OKS janji jika ada baki, duit akan diberikan kpd peguam Jul 2022 Mahkamah tetapkan RM3500 sbg jaminan
0
0
4
Jun 2022 OKS kumpul sumbangan awam untuk bayar jaminan (bail) mahkamah - sasaran RM8k - RM15k. Tak pasti berapa terkumpul dan OKS janji jika ada baki, duit akan diberikan kpd peguam Jul 2022 Mahkamah tetapkan RM3500 sbg jaminan
@aina7x @DarrelLee259272 2022 dia dah kutip duit, 3 tahun lepas tu takkan tk ckup lagi RM8k. Spam QR dia dgn 0.01 sen letak remark Scammer, confirm BNM flagged dan freeze acc dia.
1
79
73
Not a fine until the court rules so. The court proceeding does not end yet, as of today. You seek funds bcs you considered PG and wrote to AGC to retract or reduce the charge. A way of saying: you admit to the said offence and expect others to pay (suffer) for it.
My apologies for my earlier poster, which unintentionally invited mixed reactions. I wish to clarify that I was recently charged under Section 233 (1) (a) of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 and I need to pay some amount of fine. This is what I have so far
4
135
195
Artist nude takpa, defend. Wanita Islam pakai tudung, depa kata kita arabisasi, bukan budaya orang melayu. When are we gassing the libtards?
3
16
70
“Will always stand in support of the right to talk about sex, sexuality and reproductive rights.” - lejen
3
8
22
KUALA LUMPUR, 19 Nov – Gangguan Cloudflare dedah risiko tumpuan infrastruktur: bila DNS/CDN pusat gagal, jutaan laman tersangkut. Jalan keluar ialah kepelbagaian, sandaran nyata dan ujian failover. 📌 Sumber: Berita Harian Artikel penuh https://t.co/5v5Fad1XEY
1
3
3
Miskin = sendiri punya saman 8k pun mintak crowdfund orang lain sampai 10k
1
25
39
Gila la. Mahkamah dah bukti dia salah sebab tunjuk gambar tak senonoh sewaktu berdebat online. Tertuduh pergi crowdfund untuk bayar saman, dan putar cerita bahawa dia dianiaya sebab nak berkempen untuk kesedaran tentang hak wanita. Lain macam tahap putar belit.
I’m seeing a fundraiser circulating to pay an RM8,000 fine, claiming it’s for "defending a pad brand." I looked up the case, and this narrative is missing the most critical fact.
2
124
219
Hehe, berkait
@itsathenaa__ @RRAAMalaysia @grok Is selectively omit/twist/distort a fact that would change a perception for crowd funding considered as a fraud? And what is the penal code for crowdfunding fraud in malaysia? #tanyajea
0
0
1
Macam misleading je? Bkn ke kena dakwa sebab memuat naik gambar lucah (vagina tanpa sensor) bukan sebab bela jenama pad tu?
4
88
143
The claim of 'defending a pad brand' is a joke. The brand itself pulled the design. Her fine was for posting 6 obscene images to harass a lawyer. That's not 'defending' anything, it's targeted harassment. Donating just helps her deflect accountability
2
116
326
This isn't a case of being silenced for "talking about women's bodies." It's about being held accountable for a specific post deemed obscene and harassing. The fundraiser conveniently omits this fact. Don't be misled by the reframing. #Section233
1
65
233
The charge wasn't for "defending" the campaign. It was under Section 233(1)(a) CMA for posting "obscene/pornographic pictures" (a collage of 6 vulvas) at another person (a lawyer) with the "intent to hurt the feelings of others."
4
66
261
I’m seeing a fundraiser circulating to pay an RM8,000 fine, claiming it’s for "defending a pad brand." I looked up the case, and this narrative is missing the most critical fact.
20
699
907
Feminist gotta choose Either sending unsolicited image is wrong, or justified if it is just for "expression" (read : winning online argument). Somehow, for this case, depa anggap dia tak bersalah. Moga tun syed tak upload gambar for "expression", depa kata halalll
3
12
21