Blokiments
@blokiments
Followers
3K
Following
384
Media
685
Statuses
2K
Crypto analytics | rug-pull and scam protection. Join our FREE community ๐ https://t.co/Exeg487Tzy
Joined December 2021
We are ALL-IN-ONE platform tracking the most valuable on-chain/off-chain insights for traders, institutions and liquidity providers bringing multichain alpha in real time. Our Value proposition are: โ๏ธMultichain support (SOL, ETH, BSC, BASE, Tron,...) ๐ Find tokens with 60+
10
2
29
9/ Twitter Sentiment We monitor the most common Twitter posts related to a token and check for low post volume and low post views. In addition, we track the number of posts that mention the token as a scam. Combining this data helps evaluate whether a token is being artificially
0
0
1
8/ Promotions by Bad KOLs To help prevent future scams, we monitor a wide range of X accounts that have been repeatedly associated with suspicious activity. When these accounts begin promoting new tokens, we flag those tokens accordingly. By leveraging our internal scammer
1
0
1
7/ Credible scam reports Mentions from vetted, reputable Twitter/X accounts identifying the token as a scam. A high number of such mentions strongly indicates that the token is likely a scam.
1
0
1
6/ Scam Telegram Groups We monitor many Telegram scam channels and track the tokens mentioned in them. These groups include pump channels and communities that routinely promote scam tokens. If a token is promoted in any of these channels, it will be flagged here. A promotion in
1
0
1
5/ First Block Sniped Supply This metric shows the percentage of the total supply sniped in the first block. This is particularly useful for detecting certain scam patterns where the deployer snipes 50% or more of the supply in the very first block and then moves the tokens to
1
0
1
4/ Current Early Traders Supply This metric shows the current combined supply held by the first few hundred traders. Some scammers do not acquire a large portion of the supply immediately after launch, instead waiting to avoid sniping detection. With this approach, we identify
1
0
1
3/ Current Snipers Supply This metric shows the current combined supply held by all sniper wallets (wallets that bought the token within the first three minutes after launch). A large share of the supply held by snipers usually indicates a high probability of a significant dump
1
0
1
2/ Abnormal Sniping Activity This check looks for unorganic sniping activity within the first few hundred trades. It identifies unnatural patterns that commonly indicate market manipulation. While less severe than the Coordinated Sniping Activity metric, it is still considered a
1
0
1
1/ Coordinated Sniping Activity This check looks for patterns where multiple connected wallets snipe large amounts of a token. For example, if 50 wallets funded from the same source collectively snipe 60% of the total supply, it is a major red flag. Based on historical data
1
0
1
NEW UPDATE The Security Checks module analyzes different aspects of a token to identify potential scam patterns. It examines on-chain behavior, social intelligence, and early-trade forensics to detect higher-order risks that individual signals often miss.
1
0
3
@HTX_Global Some wallets: 4kptSRLaNh3Z9ADkCJAAFG8RryytjzhRk9zjdUPgKse6 BnyuQ1N1qzXyjSrus1imJau8aGXQmXsTx32dwhu5upMJ 5jFm5hZUNkUs7jZie4Uh3WKjjDc91Rw9XVAsmEmMghxx 5n8oGX5avpMj4YJ5URxs4boZdKTDY1qN9sCiBTyCtuwY 2MbozrLDq9DerU5pe8phrb7zrdpx93WPpAu4FAoiAvMG
0
0
0
6/ We now know that the main reason for the pump was hundreds of connected wallets funded with tens of millions of dollars. In the next part, we will look deeper to see if we can identify who is behind this manipulation, how much profit was made, and how the market was affected.
0
0
2
5/ The most interesting finding is the 100+ wallets funded from @HTX_Global. These wallets were created on or after November 22, which exactly coincides with the start of the pump. They were funded with over $57 million in stablecoins, which were then used to buy $PIPPIN. This
2
0
1
4/ These wallets control a large portion of the $PIPPIN supply, meaning the price action is heavily manipulated and artificially driven by this entity rather than resulting from organic market demand. In the screenshot below, you can see several examples of wallets funded from
1
0
0
3/ We analyzed the top 200 holders by examining their funding transactions (time, amount, and source), the number of transfers and swaps, and the total buy and sell volumes for the $PIPPIN token. Using this data, we were able to identify clear patterns. Over 150 wallets among
1
0
1
2/ We started the $PIPPIN analysis by running the token through our token analyzer. This showed that the token is currently listed on over 18 centralized exchanges (CEXs). However, the analyzer also identified critical issues. Most of the top holders are either new wallets or
1
0
0
1/ The $PIPPIN token launched on November 9, 2024, so it is over one year old. The token already experienced a pump in January 2025, but then quickly fell below a $22 million market cap and remained at that level until November 22 of this year. The question is: what happened on
1
0
0
$PIPPIN MANIPULATION - DEEP DIVE PART 1 CA: Dfh5DzRgSvvCFDoYc2ciTkMrbDfRKybA4SoFbPmApump Over the past few weeks, the $PIPPIN token has experienced an extraordinary rally. Its market capitalization surged from around $20 million to over $500 million, representing an almost 30x
1
3
7
6/ Suspicious Mints Sometimes scam deployers mint tokens to multiple wallets after launch to hide the supply they later plan to sell. While minting can be a legitimate action for some projects, we detect suspicious minting patterns that are commonly used by scammers. If this
0
0
0
5/ Rugpulls by DEV This shows the number of classic rug pulls, where liquidity was removed from the pool, associated with tokens previously created by the deployer wallet. If this number is greater than zero, it indicates a high risk.
1
0
0