Apparently pointing out that disparaging others for not getting vaccinated is a shaming topic and weak-minded...yet they made sure to block me. @Manin1797

The ad hom continues.

This is the standard response, saying that any dissent to the COVID narrative is "coping." Yet, wouldn't a "cope" be to create many studies to assert something as elementary as mask wearing? Science is front facing, and just is. You don't need piles of studies to show that if

Wait a minute...@Tanklytics blocked me? Remember, the best way to deal with people who dissent is to insult them, and if that doesn't work, you block them.

It is accurately a parody of what others who are into the ridiculous restrictions of Covid view others who do not adhere to these restrictions. They sadly view people as vectors of disease, and something to be shunned and protected from.

If I could ask @gr3ydot for any symptoms not synonyous with the cold or flu, could he mention any that are actually novel. • Loss of taste or smell is a common symptom.

Apparently, all sources of disease before 2020 were also due to "Covid."@lettersfromTim

One of the continuing motives for my account is to stamp out fear and panic narratives meant to manipulate people to attend to some "call to action" that will land us back into some version of 2020.

!kaybaura then blocks any further response. And her final response is ad hominem. If my stance is my identity, wouldn't it be easy to simply eradicate it, as that would be a very simple way to live? All roads would lead to that identity.

Sometimes they simply comment and pre-block. @s4ssybussy

I didn't know about your illness. But I know that before 2020, there were all sorts of devastatingly painful illnesses that were not linked at all to "Covid." The notion here also is that "We" can do something about your illness. And of course this came with an immediate block.

And more ad hominem and block.

Last Friday was a celebration of almost 250 years of having "no kings." I look forward to even greater celebrations over this year until 2026..of having no kings, all of which, if there was a king in the white house, no doubt would have prohibited them.

And @Mutti561 resorts to ad hominem and appeal to experts logical fallacies.

While responding to ad hominem attacks is like swinging at balls outside the strike zone, I will call them like "balls." I even enjoyed the way some batters would catch the balls outside of the strike zone and toss them back to the pitcher.

Responding to ad hominem attacks is like swinging at balls way outside the strike zone.

And the answer is more ad hominem.

And yet, maskks do not work.

I guess disagreeing with someone has its issues. They report your account as somehow inauthentic.

It is a sarcastic name that I adopted with many of my interactions with those who believe masks work, and that people are filthy vectors of infection.