After a day working with Codex, I don't think OpenAI has any place in my life anymore. I am going to sleep on it, but probably cancelling that subscription in the morning.

Autonomy doesn’t remove humans. It forces us to decide when they matter.

“Move fast” and “autonomous AI” should probably not be in the same sentence.

Be honest: are you building AI for capability or for control?

The most impressive AI systems are often the scariest ones to operate.

Edge cases aren’t rare. They are just patient.

When your AI makes commercial claims, you’re legally on the hook. The model isn’t.

What’s your definition of “human-in-the-loop”? Approval? Escalation? Or just the panic button?

They banned Claude and ChatGPT at my day job. Something about concerns they may be stealing their customer's information and reselling it. I wonder what would make them think they wouldn't honor a contract?

Autonomy without boundaries isn’t innovation. It’s misplaced optimism.

Every AI system needs a panic button. Otherwise the internet becomes the alarm system.

Logs aren’t bureaucracy. They’re memory.

AI that can’t be audited shouldn’t be deployed. Full stop.

Would you let your AI talk to your biggest customer unsupervised?

When autonomy increases, governance has to increase with it. Physics doesn’t bend for startups or enterprises.

Autonomous agents are like interns. Great with guardrails. Chaos without them.

Most AI risk starts as “we’ll monitor it later.”

Replacing human labor is easy, but replacing accountability isn’t.

If your AI made a bad decision today, how long would it take you to find out?

The first irreversible AI mistake is usually small. That’s why it slips through.