Alex Everhart
@aoeverhart
Followers
654
Following
8K
Media
132
Statuses
2K
Instructor at @WUSTLmed, health economist studying development and adoption of health technology. By way of: @HarvardMIT_CRS, @UMN_HPM, and @EconStOlaf
St. Louis, MO
Joined May 2012
New paper out in BMJ. Short summary on the good website: .
Important new study from @aoeverhart & colleagues in @bmj_latest quantifying delays in medical device adverse event reporting to @US_FDA . >400K safety events reported ***6 months*** after they occurred! .
0
0
2
Did anyone have a grant reviewed and scored by AHRQ in May? Kind of convinced the meeting didn't happen, but maybe I can't tell the difference between no meeting vs not discussed on eRA Commons.
0
0
0
RT @PowerA: We're teaming up with @officialpacman for a giveaway to celebrate 45 years of PAC-MAN! . Enter now for your chance to win! http….
0
510
0
Happening in one hour, webinar on foundation funding hosted by the AcademyHealth Health Economics Interest Group! Join us for a panel discussion featuring leaders from the Commonwealth Fund, Arnold Ventures, and the Donaghue Foundation. Register here:
0
0
0
RT @Jabaluck: RE: reforming NIH funding, my view is -- keep total $ the same or increase it, but:.a) Do fast review (<1 month) based on 2 p….
0
14
0
RT @Jabaluck: The best study I know estimates that each dollar of NIH spending generates $1.40-$2.80 in value counting *only the private re….
0
507
0
RT @stuartbuck1: What NIH purports to do here is illegal. In annual appropriations bills for the past several years, Congress has specifica….
0
203
0
There's no good time to announce slashing the NIH budget, but announcing it on a Friday afternoon to go into effect on Monday when all early career award proposals are due on Wednesday seems extra cruel (to me, specifically).
Drastic NIH cuts are existential threat to U.S. research . By @hmkyale
0
0
4
RT @matthewherper: Drastic NIH cuts are existential threat to U.S. research . By @hmkyale
statnews.com
The drastic reduction in indirect costs is not a path to innovation or cost savings — it’s a threat to U.S.’s position as global leader in medical research.
0
16
0
RT @brittanytrang: NEW @statnews:. Members of NIH study sections confirmed that some study sections have resumed reviewing grants this week….
statnews.com
National Institutes of Health holds first grant review meetings since first days of the Trump administration
0
6
0
2017 -> 2024. ☹️
With new @US_FDA leadership on the horizon, thought I would resurface our work on medical devices. What if our ability to monitor the safety of devices already existed in available data, but we missed the warning signs? Our example here @JAMA_current :
0
0
2
I can have a little hour of doomscrolling on Monday morning. As a treat.
0
0
2
RT @angie_rasmussen: On Data Purge Eve, many people stayed up late to save the CDC website. @charles_gaba downloaded the whole thing. 👑. A….
acasignups.net
UPDATE: I've converted the entire CDC.Gov website archive index into a new page with an alphabetical drop-down menu for easier navigation here: CDC Website As horrific as it is that the Trump/Musk
0
6K
0
RT @AssumeNormality: 🚨Re-upping this since the website for HRSA's Area Health Resources Files is now down . The data in this Mendeley Repo….
0
9
0
RT @matthewherper: It's one thing to take down pages talking about diversity in science. It's another thing entirely to take down research….
0
40
0
Getting an acceptance on a Friday: 😃. "You have 48 hours to reformat your manuscript to comply with our style requirements": ☹️.
1
0
9
RT @JakeMGrumbach: Great paper. Rare good news from the diff in diff industry, wholesome content ❤️.
0
1
0
RT @friosavila: 🔍 Did you know you can handle continuous and multivalue treatments in DiD? At #OSC2025, learn how JWDID expands your toolki….
0
8
0
RT @CraigPalosky: Confused about Medicare Parts A, B, C and D?. @KFF's virtual Health Policy 101 textbook explains it all: .
kff.org
This Health Policy 101 chapter explores Medicare, a federal health insurance program covering more than 66 million people, established in 1965 for people age 65 or older and later expanded to cover...
0
11
0