
Dr Andy Badby
@andy_badby
Followers
528
Following
1K
Media
118
Statuses
466
Sports Scientist | PhD, MSc, BSc (Hons) | Consultant to 20+ Pro Teams in England | Private S&C in East MCR | Previously @FAWales, @EFL, @TheVanaramaNL
Manchester, England
Joined May 2021
⚽️ Back to pre-season testing this week?. 📊 If so, use these CMJ mRSI benchmarks for pro and youth soccer players to gauge player performance!. 🔜 Taken from the largest normative data sample ever produced in ⚽️ More info coming soon via publication!. #SportsScience #ForcePlates
3
17
93
🚨⬇️ Check out this extended view of our reliability statistics, ranked from best to worst CV%! . #SportsScience #ForcePlates #Monitoring #Football
🚨⬇️ Choose the best metrics and meaningful % change values for your fatigue monitoring system this season! . We tested 60+ CMJ & CMRJ metrics in elite youth ⚽️ players — in-season, under REAL-WORLD conditions. ✅ Only 15 CMJ & 5 CMRJ metrics passed (CV ≤10%, ICC ≥0.75) .🚀
0
4
15
RT @crewealexfc: We're pleased to announce that Stan Dancey has signed his first professional contract 🙌🔴. Congratulations, Stan! 👏. @Dayin….
0
8
0
RT @crewealexfc: The Football Club can confirm that Luca Moore has signed his first professional contract 🙌🔴. Congratulations, Luca! 👏. @Da….
0
6
0
RT @Tatopek1: 🆕"The CMJ test is a feasible & reliable SSC test which can be utilized for monitoring acute changes in NMF in youth ⚽️ player….
0
22
0
RT @GMHollins: 📜Really useful paper ⬇️. When technology can provide 400+ metrics, it's so important to be able to filter & know which ones….
0
1
0
RT @sciofmultispeed: 🚨 The 3 Phases of Ground Contact in Horizontal Deceleration 🏃♂️💥. Understanding how the body absorbs force during dec….
0
34
0
RT @crewealexfc: The Football Club is delighted to announce that Jordan Hodkin has signed his first professional contract ✍️🔴. Congratulati….
0
7
0
RT @crewealexfc: We are delighted to announce that Olly Armstrong has signed his first professional contract with the Football Club ✍️🔴. Co….
0
8
0
Over 24,800 views in the past 4 weeks! 📊. Thank you to everyone who read, shared, or engaged with our recent study! 📖 . A key driver of reach: this series of quote re-posts breaking down each discussion topic ⬇️ . These alone made up 65% of views on X, highlighting the value of
✅ Conclusion: We haven’t earned the right to monitor fatigue. 😵💫 Force plate data is everywhere - but definitions, calculations, and phase terms vary wildly. 🗣️ Without standardisation, we’re not tracking fatigue; we’re tracking noise. ⬇️ To move forward, research must:. 1️⃣
0
0
4
✅ Conclusion: We haven’t earned the right to monitor fatigue. 😵💫 Force plate data is everywhere - but definitions, calculations, and phase terms vary wildly. 🗣️ Without standardisation, we’re not tracking fatigue; we’re tracking noise. ⬇️ To move forward, research must:. 1️⃣
🚫 We can’t keep comparing metrics we haven’t even defined. ⬇️ In force plate testing for fatigue monitoring, our review found widespread issues: . – Many studies didn’t report how metrics were calculated.– JH was calculated 5 different ways.– “Peak force” meant two entirely
0
0
7
🚫 We can’t keep comparing metrics we haven’t even defined. ⬇️ In force plate testing for fatigue monitoring, our review found widespread issues: . – Many studies didn’t report how metrics were calculated.– JH was calculated 5 different ways.– “Peak force” meant two entirely
⚠️ If you only monitor jump height, you’re guessing . 🤔 Jump height is the most commonly reported metric, but that doesn’t mean it’s the most useful . 📊 Force plate systems give us so much more - yet most practitioners still focus only on outcome metrics (like jump height or
0
1
6
⚠️ If you only monitor jump height, you’re guessing . 🤔 Jump height is the most commonly reported metric, but that doesn’t mean it’s the most useful . 📊 Force plate systems give us so much more - yet most practitioners still focus only on outcome metrics (like jump height or
Want to know which tests people are using for fatigue monitoring? ⬇️ . 1️⃣ Dynamic testing dominates 🤾 . 33 of 35 studies used dynamic assessments.Only 2 studies used isometric assessments. 2️⃣ Vertical jump tests lead the way 🚀 . All dynamic assessments were vertically oriented,
0
1
6
Want to know which tests people are using for fatigue monitoring? ⬇️ . 1️⃣ Dynamic testing dominates 🤾 . 33 of 35 studies used dynamic assessments.Only 2 studies used isometric assessments. 2️⃣ Vertical jump tests lead the way 🚀 . All dynamic assessments were vertically oriented,
In our review of 30 studies using force plates to monitor fatigue: . ⏰ Most testing was done pre/post activity - rarely beyond 24h . 🩺 Only 2 studies used internal load data. 🥼 Lab-based protocols dominated, but real-world relevance was often missing. But, ⬇️ . ❌ Fatigue
0
0
3
In our review of 30 studies using force plates to monitor fatigue: . ⏰ Most testing was done pre/post activity - rarely beyond 24h . 🩺 Only 2 studies used internal load data. 🥼 Lab-based protocols dominated, but real-world relevance was often missing. But, ⬇️ . ❌ Fatigue
Force plate use in fatigue monitoring is growing rapidly - but hardware choices vary wildly. In our scoping review of 30 studies:. 😥 18 different models used . 📶 Sampling rates ranged from 200 Hz to 5000 Hz . 🚯 Some didn’t meet testing standards (≥1000 Hz) . Validated,
0
1
5
Force plate use in fatigue monitoring is growing rapidly - but hardware choices vary wildly. In our scoping review of 30 studies:. 😥 18 different models used . 📶 Sampling rates ranged from 200 Hz to 5000 Hz . 🚯 Some didn’t meet testing standards (≥1000 Hz) . Validated,
Force plates can detect neuromuscular fatigue with precision - but only if we use them properly . In our scoping review of 30 studies: ⬇️ . 0️⃣ Only 6 reported zeroing the force plate . ⚖️ Only 6 reported athlete weighing protocols . ⁉️ Just 3 detailed the testing surface used
0
0
6
Force plates can detect neuromuscular fatigue with precision - but only if we use them properly . In our scoping review of 30 studies: ⬇️ . 0️⃣ Only 6 reported zeroing the force plate . ⚖️ Only 6 reported athlete weighing protocols . ⁉️ Just 3 detailed the testing surface used
In our scoping review of force plate fatigue monitoring: ⬇️ . Avg. sample size? Just 14.5 👎 .80% of studies included males (N = 256); only 3 studies included females 🤔 .More studies reported unspecified sex (N = 32) than female participants 🤯 . This matters as force plate test.
0
1
8