For those of you following the progress on WCAG 3, the next update is here! This article includes the details and insights from the co-chairs of the group: https://t.co/Qlxzl38ogY Remember: WCAG 3 drafts do not replace WCAG 2. More info:

Why doesn’t AI work for producing accessible code? Because accessibility isn't about averages.

For any accessibility curmudgeons (and non-curmudgeons), have I missed anything obvious from this list of improvements browsers could include? https://t.co/UiYL39LkMT

Over the years, there always seem to be two questions after an accessibility talk: “How do I persuade my boss?” And “What’s the best tool to use?” There might be a new one: “does AI negate the need for accessibility work?"

WCAG 2.2 is now published as a Web Standard (“W3C Recommendation”)! For an introduction to WCAG, see WCAG 2 Overview https://t.co/TV2opRMbly There are a few updates in #WCAG 2 FAQ https://t.co/6Aj7PJzFZw And new "In briefs" in What's New in WCAG 2.2 https://t.co/FElZ26EnPP

Listening to @themonkeycage and wondering if the point of life is to evolve sufficiently to prevent the heat death of the universe. As you do.

Open position! #W3C #WAI is seeking an Accessibility Specialist to work on digital accessibility standards and supporting materials. This is a unique opportunity to contribute to the vision of an accessible digital future. See: https://t.co/FvtHhjo18n #a11y #wcag #hiring #job

I wonder: If @UKLabour announced that they would rescind the licenses in the next parliament, would anyone take up these licenses?

It's important to measure compared to the alternatives. The study said "One hour of ... videoconferencing can emit between 150 and 1,000 grams of carbon dioxide... a car produces about 8,887 grams from burning one gallon of gasoline." So a magnitude better than office meetings?

I'm generally inclined to believe what the Bank of England says over the Government, but this is an important thread on inflation. I don't know if it's all correct, but it is an explanation of why the BoE's policy isn't working.

Phew, done! My favourite line was: "It's much easier to know if accessibility has been incorporated by looking at the creation process, than looking at the final output." Video available Friday...

Context: Working with a product team, so I can make assumptions that they know the use / importance of the different areas of the interface.

Prioritising accessibility issues has so many factors. The simplest approach I've been able to boil it down to is: Assume that whatever feature the issue is associated with does not work for 10% of users. Prioritise based on the importance of the feature.

Hmm, just had a very realistic (but automated) sales call for life insurance. I hesitated too long and it misunderstood and jumped into the next section. Now I'm wondering if it was recorded snippets or ML-generated...

Possibly the best p0wn I've seen, and with a disability angle.

Arg, reading (another provider's) audit and over 50% of the issues are under the wrong SC, 20% are misunderstanding the expected behaviour of screenreaders, and 15% are just wrong. <facepalm gif>

Rishi Sunak in genius mode… explaining why having full access to UK home market and EU Single Market is so prized by investors. Could even explain why UK’s massive internal investment dropped when Brexit pulled England, Scotland and Wales out of exactly that enviable position.

"A new maturity to the UK government we haven't seen before"

Hmm, my (known) financial services provider has sent me "secure" email that asks you to open an HTML attachment that then takes you a registration page... how is that good practice?

https://t.co/ULr3rkV06d (2/2)