ahmadjavid Profile Banner
Javid Ahmad Profile
Javid Ahmad

@ahmadjavid

Followers
18K
Following
2K
Media
56
Statuses
2K

Views are my own.

Washington, DC
Joined April 2011
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@ahmadjavid
Javid Ahmad
1 year
Introducing our comprehensive repository of the 'who’s who' in the #Taliban government: the first consolidated open-source tracker, developed over two years by @MiddleEastInst, profiling nearly 1,200 Taliban leaders across the board. #MEITalibanTracker https://t.co/DaqbUN2bMp
Tweet card summary image
talibantracker.mei.edu
1
53
107
@ahmadjavid
Javid Ahmad
9 days
On this #ThanksgivingDay, the most basic and overdue gesture for Afghans whom the United States has so generously resettled and supported is to show appreciation and thank America and the American people for their unmatched generosity and hospitality.
0
2
4
@ahmadjavid
Javid Ahmad
13 days
Afghans need to return to a space where they can confront uncomfortable ideas, debate them openly, and grow through that discomfort. With any luck, I hope this book will challenge its readers and contribute to an objective debate about Afghanistan’s future.
@N_Nadery
Nader Nadery
13 days
He was 15 years old. His turban was too large for his small frame. And he was my torturer. In 1998, I was a student activist in a Taliban prison cell. In 2020, I sat across the table from the Taliban leadership as a negotiator for the Republic. This is the story of the distance
0
3
8
@ahmadjavid
Javid Ahmad
24 days
Join us at this @MiddleEastInst discussion today at 11 am (Washington time) on the growingly dangerous tensions between Pakistan and the Taliban, U.S. interests, and what lies ahead. https://t.co/XJc2nBPYQX
mei.edu
Last month, Pakistani fighter jets carried out airstrikes against Kabul and other Afghan cities, and soldiers from both sides engaged in fierce cross-border clashes over several weeks. The armed...
0
0
4
@ForeignPolicy
Foreign Policy
2 months
The Trump administration could exploit the Taliban’s internal fissures through a right mix of incentives, back-channel diplomacy, and pressure from regional actors, argues @ahmadjavid.
Tweet card summary image
foreignpolicy.com
Internal fissures mean that the Taliban’s rejection of the issue is far from settled.
1
4
10
@ColinPClarke
Colin P. Clarke, Ph.D.
2 months
How Trump Could Get Bagram Back - Internal fissures mean that the Taliban’s rejection of the issue is far from settled.
Tweet card summary image
foreignpolicy.com
Internal fissures mean that the Taliban’s rejection of the issue is far from settled.
2
2
4
@ahmadjavid
Javid Ahmad
2 months
0
0
1
@crtitusiii
Clifford Titus
4 months
Luke 11: 42-48 KJV 42 But woe unto you, Pharisees! for ye tithe mint and rue and all manner of herbs, and pass over judgment and the love of God: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone. 43 Woe unto you, Pharisees! for ye love the uppermost seats in the
25
124
773
@ahmadjavid
Javid Ahmad
2 months
Securing partial or full access to Bagram would mean striking a pragmatic bargain and exploring creative basing options. Here are some potential pathways, via @ForeignPolicy.
1
1
2
@ForeignPolicy
Foreign Policy
2 months
While the Taliban quickly rejected Trump’s demand to repossess Bagram Airfield, the issue is far from settled, writes @ahmadjavid.
Tweet card summary image
foreignpolicy.com
Internal fissures mean that the Taliban’s rejection of the issue is far from settled.
5
2
8
@ForeignPolicy
Foreign Policy
2 months
Trump, who has repeatedly raised the issue of control of Bagram Airfield since the U.S. withdrawal, now appears to be ramping up his push. “We want it back and we want it back soon,” he warned.
Tweet card summary image
foreignpolicy.com
Internal fissures mean that the Taliban’s rejection of the issue is far from settled.
2
5
10
@ahmadjavid
Javid Ahmad
2 months
At least four viable pathways exist for President @realDonaldTrump to re-establish presence in Bagram. Here’s what each would require. My take in @ForeignPolicy. https://t.co/Tc0JTNVyXp
Tweet card summary image
foreignpolicy.com
Internal fissures mean that the Taliban’s rejection of the issue is far from settled.
0
3
3
@JasonHCampbell
Jason H. Campbell
10 months
Excellent (& timely) piece by @ahmadjavid. #Afghanistan remains key geopolitical/security concern for U.S. interests. Renewed, if limited, engagement w/#Taliban warrants close consideration. The U.S. Can No Longer Ignore the Threat Arising in Afghanistan
Tweet card summary image
nytimes.com
Engaging directly with the Taliban may be the only way to protect Americans from the jihadist threat that stirs once again in Afghanistan.
3
4
12
@ahmadjavid
Javid Ahmad
9 months
This extensive Taliban leadership repository—the first of its kind—has been updated as of March 2025. #MEITalibanTracker @MiddleEastInst
@ahmadjavid
Javid Ahmad
1 year
Introducing our comprehensive repository of the 'who’s who' in the #Taliban government: the first consolidated open-source tracker, developed over two years by @MiddleEastInst, profiling nearly 1,200 Taliban leaders across the board. #MEITalibanTracker https://t.co/DaqbUN2bMp
0
0
2
@TPASarah
Sarah Adams
1 year
For those needing help following the #terrorist #Taliban senior leadership names from our episode #116 on the @ShawnRyanShow, this is a great tool: https://t.co/caD59kxVW8
Tweet card summary image
talibantracker.mei.edu
21
59
293
@nytopinion
New York Times Opinion
10 months
“The Trump administration faces a stark choice: Let Afghanistan spiral further into jihadism and China’s orbit or engage pragmatically with the Taliban,” writes Javid Ahmad. https://t.co/XpqbSvFCTl
Tweet card summary image
nytimes.com
Engaging directly with the Taliban may be the only way to protect Americans from the jihadist threat that stirs once again in Afghanistan.
3
3
4
@MiddleEastInst
Middle East Institute
10 months
"Engaging with the Taliban would be a bitter pill for America to swallow, but as Secretary of State Marco Rubio recently pointed out, US foreign policy is often about choosing the 'least bad' option," MEI's Javid Ahmad writes in the @nytimes.
Tweet card summary image
nytimes.com
Engaging directly with the Taliban may be the only way to protect Americans from the jihadist threat that stirs once again in Afghanistan.
0
3
1
@AFIntlBrk
افغانستان اینترنشنال
10 months
درخواست از ترامپ برای تعامل با طالبان نیویارک تایمز در مطلبی گفته است که باز پس‌ گیری تجهیزات نظامی بدون تماس با طالبان ممکن نیست. این رویکرد می‌تواند نفوذ آمریکا در افغانستان را تقویت کند. عارف یعقوبی گزارش می‌دهد:
5
3
79
@ElliottSchoolGW
The Elliott School
10 months
For The New York Times, Javid Ahmad. professorial lecturer in international affairs, authored the article “The U.S. Can No Longer Ignore the Threat Arising in Afghanistan.’’ Read it here ⬇️ https://t.co/OUF6Wbnlc3
Tweet card summary image
nytimes.com
Engaging directly with the Taliban may be the only way to protect Americans from the jihadist threat that stirs once again in Afghanistan.
0
1
1